Outcomes of Six Specific Types of Post-Hospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Programs.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate outcomes of intensive posthospital brain injury rehabilitation programs compared to supported living (SL) programs; explore variations in outcome by diagnostic category (traumatic brain injury, stroke, and other acquired brain injury [ABI]) and specific program type. SETTING: Data were obtained from Residential Neurobehavioral, Residential Neurorehabilitation, Home and Community Neurorehabilitation, Day Treatment, Outpatient Neurorehabilitation, and SL programs serving individuals with ABI. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2120 individuals with traumatic brain injury, stroke, or other ABI participated in this study. MAIN MEASURES: The main measures are sex, age, time since injury, and Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (4th edition; MPAI-4). DESIGN: Retrospective analyses of demographic variables and MPAI-4 Total, index, and subscale Rasch-derived T-scores on admission and discharge. RESULTS: Gains on MPAI-4  Total T-scores were significantly greater for the intensive rehabilitation (IR) group in comparison to stable functioning in the SL group (F = 236.69, P < .001, partial η2 = .101) while controlling for admission/time 1 scores; similar results were found for MPAI-4 indices and subscales. For the IR cohort, discharge scores differed by diagnostic category after controlling for admission scores for the Total MPAI-4 T-score (F = 22.65, P < .001, partial η2 = .025), as well as all indices and subscales. A statistically significant interaction between program type and diagnostic group on discharge MPAI-4 Total T-scores (F = 2.55, P = .018, partial η2 = .01) after controlling for admission scores indicated that differing outcomes across diagnoses also varied by program type. Varying significant main effects and interactions were apparent for MPAI-4 indices and subscales with generally small effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Significant gains on MPAI-4 variables across IR program types compared to no change over a comparable period of time for SL programs supports the effectiveness of posthospital brain injury rehabilitation. This finding in the presence of small effect sizes on outcome variables for program type and for significant interactions between program type and diagnostic category suggests that participants generally were appropriately matched to program type and benefited from interventions provided through specific program types.

Distinguishing Characteristics of Admissions to Various Types of Posthospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Programs.

OBJECTIVE: Describe and compare the demographic characteristics and disability profiles of individuals admitted to 6 types of posthospital brain injury rehabilitation (PHBIR) programs. SETTING: Data from Residential Neurobehavioral, Residential Neurorehabilitation, Home and Community Neurorehabilitation, Day Treatment, Outpatient Neurorehabilitation, and Supported Living programs serving individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI). PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand twenty-eight individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, or other ABI. MAIN MEASURES: Sex, age, time since injury, and Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory, 4th edition (MPAI-4). DESIGN: Retrospective analyses of demographic variables and MPAI-4 Total, Index, and subscale Rasch-derived T-scores on admission comparing diagnostic categories and program types within diagnostic categories. RESULTS: Participants with TBI were predominantly male, and those with stroke were generally older. Admissions to more intensive and supervised programs (residential neurobehavioral and residential neurorehabilitation) generally showed greater disability than admissions to home and community programs who were more disabled than participants in day treatment and outpatient programs. Residential neurobehavioral and supported living program participants generally were male and had TBI. Home and community admissions tended to be more delayed than residential neurorehabilitation admissions. The majority of those with other ABI were admitted to outpatient rather than more intensive programs. Additional analyses demonstrated significant differences in MPAI-4 profiles among the various program types. CONCLUSIONS: Admissions with TBI, stroke, and other ABI to PHBIR differ in demographic factors and disability profiles. When examined within each diagnostic category, demographic features and disability profiles also distinguish among admissions to the various program types. Results provide insights about decision-making in referral patterns to various types of PHBIR programs, although other factors not available for analysis (eg, participant/family preference, program, and funding availability) likely also contribute to admission patterns.

Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Posthospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Providers.

Rehabilitation after significant acquired brain injury (ABI) to address complex independent activities of daily living and return to family and community life is offered primarily after initial hospitalization in outpatient day treatment, group home, skilled nursing, and residential settings and in the home and community of the person served. The coronavirus 2019 pandemic threatened access to care and the health and safety of staff, persons served, and families in these settings. This article describes steps taken to contain this threat by 7 leading posthospital ABI rehabilitation organizations. Outpatient and day treatment facilities were temporarily suspended. In other settings, procedures for isolation, transportation, cleaning, exposure control, infection control, and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) were reinforced with staff. Visitation and community activities were restricted. Staff and others required to enter facilities were screened with symptom checklists and temperature checks. Individuals showing symptoms of infection were quarantined and tested, as possible. New admissions were carefully screened for infection and often initially quarantined. Telehealth played a major role in reducing direct interpersonal contact while continuing to provide services both to outpatients and within facilities. Salary, benefits, training, and managerial support were enhanced for staff. Despite early outbreaks, these procedures were generally effective, with preliminary initial infections rates of only 1.1% for persons served and 2.1% for staff. Reductions in admissions, services, and unanticipated expenses (eg, PPE, more frequent and thorough cleaning) had a major negative financial effect. Providers continue to be challenged to adapt rehabilitative approaches and to reopen services.

Hospital-Based Health Care After Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate trends of hospital-based health care utilization after admission to a level I trauma center after acute traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Large urban trauma hospital and a hospital council data registry consisting of 88 member institutions (>150 hospitals) covering 15,000 square miles. PARTICIPANTS: All patients (N=5291) admitted to a level I trauma center between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2014, who experienced an acute TBI based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Included the incidence and type of select hospital-based services received. Analyses were also categorized based on demographic and injury-related information. RESULTS: Of the 5291 patients with newly acquired TBI who were admitted, 512 died, leaving 4779 patients for inclusion in the final analysis. Additional health care utilization from January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2014, was recorded for 3158 patients (66%), totaling 12,307 encounters, with a median of 3 encounters (interquartile range, 1-5) and a maximum of 102 encounters. Most nonadmission urgent or procedural visits (96%) and inpatient encounters (93%) occurred in the first year. Of all the additional encounters, 9769 visits were nonadmission urgent or procedural visits (79%) with a median charge of $1955. The most common type of encounter was elective (46%), followed by medical emergency (29%). Of the remaining 2538 inpatient encounters (21%), the mean length of stay was 6 days with a median charge of $28,450. Medical emergency (39%) and elective admissions (33%) again were the most common encounter type. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis encompasses health care utilization across the range of TBI severity and numerous hospital systems, allowing for a more comprehensive and objective identification of reasons for readmission. This represents an initial step to developing a preventive intervention to manage secondary complications postinjury.

Brain-computer interface for individuals after spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of brain-computer interface (BCI) with patients on an inpatient spinal cord injury (SCI) unit. Research Method/Design: This study included 25 participants aged 18-64 who sustained traumatic or nontraumatic SCI and did not have severe cognitive or psychiatric impairment. Participants completed a variety of screening measures related to cognition, psychological disposition, pain, and technology experience/interest. The Emotiv electroencephalography system was used in conjunction with a cube rotation and manipulation game presented on a laptop computer. RESULTS: The majority of participants successfully completed the BCI game and reported enjoyment of the experience. Outside of a mild trend of lower performance among participants with a past or present head injury, there were no demographic variables, injury variables or screening measures significantly associated with BCI performance. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The BCI paradigm demonstrated feasibility and safety across participant age range, educational and vocational background, and level of injury. Despite the rapid integration of technology into rehabilitation health care settings, there are few evidence-based studies regarding the feasibility of technology with specific inpatient populations. Clinical implications and challenges of using this technology in a rehabilitation setting are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Virtual reality and brain computer interface in neurorehabilitation.

The potential benefit of technology to enhance recovery after central nervous system injuries is an area of increasing interest and exploration. The primary emphasis to date has been motor recovery/augmentation and communication. This paper introduces two original studies to demonstrate how advanced technology may be integrated into subacute rehabilitation. The first study addresses the feasibility of brain computer interface with patients on an inpatient spinal cord injury unit. The second study explores the validity of two virtual environments with acquired brain injury as part of an intensive outpatient neurorehabilitation program. These preliminary studies support the feasibility of advanced technologies in the subacute stage of neurorehabilitation. These modalities were well tolerated by participants and could be incorporated into patients' inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation regimens without schedule disruptions. This paper expands the limited literature base regarding the use of advanced technologies in the early stages of recovery for neurorehabilitation populations and speaks favorably to the potential integration of brain computer interface and virtual reality technologies as part of a multidisciplinary treatment program.

Functional recovery from neuroinvasive West Nile Virus: A tale of two courses.

OBJECTIVE: In 2012, the highest numbers of West Nile Virus (WNV) cases were reported by the Center for Disease Control since 2003. This outbreak included over half of the identified patients being classified with one of the more debilitating neuroinvasive subtypes of WNV. Despite improvements in diagnosis and treatment options in symptom management, longitudinal research on WNV neurocognitive and functional outcomes is limited by sample size, retrospective review, and/or reliance on self-report measures for cognitive status and level of independence. This study describes the cases of 2 patients diagnosed with WNV as they complete rehabilitation across the continuum of care. RESEARCH METHOD: Review of two cases that experience different rehabilitation outcomes 4-18 months post diagnosis. RESULTS: The cases presented here demonstrate the potentially differential courses of recovery and outcomes for physical (e.g., balance, ambulation, upper extremity function), cognitive (e.g., attention, executive functions, memory, language, visuospatial), and emotional functioning, as assessed via measures administered by the patient's physical therapists and neuropsychologists. These patients were evaluated as part of the standard clinical practice to monitor changes, track recovery, and provide recommendations across the continuum of care from admission to discharge from acute inpatient rehabilitation, during outpatient day neurorehabilitation, and while receiving outpatient neuropsychology services. CONCLUSIONS: These cases highlight the variability in rehabilitative course for individuals diagnosed with WNV. Consistent follow-up with patients is recommended to ensure management of remitting and chronic symptoms.