Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Opin Psychiatry ; 26(4): 355-61, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23695530

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mentally ill homeless persons are among the most neglected or marginalized patient groups. Their needs for mental healthcare are widely unmet. The current economic crisis probably accelerates the social decline and deterioration of physical and mental health in high-risk groups worldwide and increases the need for appropriate treatments, services, and prevention strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: Research on service provision for mentally disordered homeless people (from 2010 to 2012) covers the following issues: epidemiology of mental ill health among homeless persons, service delivery and healthcare utilization, specific treatments, specific high-risk groups among homeless persons, and subjective experience with mental health service provision. SUMMARY: The number of studies published on these issues between 2010 and 2012 may suggest an awareness for the need for adequate service provision of this marginalized clientele. Research evidence is still not sufficient. The majority of studies are from the United States. The methodological quality of the studies is still moderate, being descriptive in nature or applying qualitative approaches to small samples. Included are usually easy to access patients from inner-city regions. There is an encouraging trend to focus on younger age groups that supports the focus on primary or secondary prevention strategies for homelessness and mental disorders.


Subject(s)
Ill-Housed Persons , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/standards , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Humans , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Social Work/organization & administration
2.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 68(11): 1763-74, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18052570

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) have proven superior to first-generation antipsychotics regarding relapse prevention, mainly in multiple-episode patients. Practice guidelines recommend SGAs as first-line treatment particularly in first-episode patients, although evidence for this group is still limited. Accordingly, the hypothesis of whether 1-year relapse rate in first-episode schizophrenia under maintenance treatment with risperidone is lower compared to haloperidol in low dose was tested. METHOD: Between November 2000 and May 2004, 1372 patients had been screened for eligibility in the inpatient facilities of 13 German psychiatric university hospitals. 159 remitted patients were enrolled after treatment of an acute first episode of schizophrenia according to ICD-10 F20 criteria. In the randomized controlled trial, double-blind antipsychotic treatment with risperidone or haloperidol was maintained in a targeted dose of 2 to 4 mg/day for 1 year. 151 patients were eligible for analysis. For 127 patients, this was a continuation trial after 8 weeks of randomized, double-blind, acute treatment with the same drugs; 24 patients were additionally randomly assigned after open acute treatment. RESULTS: With both antipsychotics (risperidone, N = 77; haloperidol, N = 74), no relapse evolved. Additionally, according to 2 post hoc defined measures of "marked clinical deterioration," significant differences occurred neither in the 2 respective deterioration rates (risperidone = 9%/23%; haloperidol = 8%/22%) nor in time until deterioration. Both antipsychotics were equally effective regarding significant symptom reduction and improvement in quality of life. Extrapyramidal symptoms were slightly higher with haloperidol. The overall dropout rate of 68%, however, was not significantly different between the 2 drug groups. CONCLUSION: Against the background of an overall favorable outcome, the hypothesized difference between risperidone and low-dose haloperidol regarding relapse prevention could not be supported for this sample of patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Possible design-related reasons for this finding are discussed. With regard to the high dropout rate, special programs are needed to keep schizophrenia patients who are in their early acute and postacute illness course in effective and safe treatment. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00159081.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Biomedical Research , Cooperative Behavior , Haloperidol/therapeutic use , Risperidone/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenic Psychology , Acute Disease , Adult , Algorithms , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Germany , Haloperidol/administration & dosage , Haloperidol/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life/psychology , Risperidone/administration & dosage , Risperidone/adverse effects , Secondary Prevention , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...