An assessment of the psychometric properties of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire - Sickle Cell Disease (CSQ-SCD) among adults in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported conflicting factor structures of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire - Sickle Cell Disease (CSQ-SCD). This study examined the psychometric properties of the CSQ-SCD among adults with SCD in the United States. METHODS: This study implemented a cross-sectional study design with web-based self-administered surveys. Individuals with SCD were recruited via an online panel. Psychometric properties, including factorial and construct validity, and internal consistency reliability, of the CSQ-SCD were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 196 adults with SCD completed the survey. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), using maximum likelihood estimation and the 13 subscale scores as factor indicators, supported a three-factor model for the CSQ-SCD compared to a two-factor model. Model fit statistics for the three-factor model were: Chi-square [df] = 227.084 [62]; CFI = 0.817; TLI = 0.770; RMSEA [90% CI] = 0.117 [0.101-0.133]; SRMR = 0.096. All standardized factor loadings (except for the subscales isolation, resting, taking fluids, and praying and hoping) were > 0.5 and statistically significant, indicating evidence of convergent validity. Correlations between all subscales (except praying and hoping) were lower than hypothesized; however, model testing revealed that the three latent factors, active coping, affective coping, and passive adherence coping were not perfectly correlated, suggesting discriminant validity. Internal consistency reliabilities for the active coping factor (α = 0.803) and affective coping factor (α = 0.787) were satisfactory, however, reliability was inadequate for the passive adherence coping factor (α = 0.531). Given this overall pattern of results, a follow-up exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was also conducted. The new factor structure extracted by EFA supported a three-factor structure (based on the results of a parallel analysis), wherein the subscale of praying and hoping loaded on the active coping factor. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the CSQ-SCD was found to have less than adequate psychometric validity in our sample of adults with SCD. These results provide clarification around the conflicting factor structure results reported in the literature and demonstrate a need for the future development of a SCD specific coping instrument.

Continuity of opioid prescribing among older adults on long-term opioids.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the continuity of opioid prescribing and prescriber characteristics among older adults with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) who are on long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) and to evaluate the association of continuity of opioid prescribing and prescriber characteristics with the risk of opioid-related adverse events. STUDY DESIGN: Nested case-control design. METHODS: This study employed a nested case-control design using a 5% random sample of the national Medicare administrative claims data for 2012-2016. Eligible individuals experiencing a composite outcome of opioid-related adverse events were defined as cases and matched to controls using incidence density sampling. Continuity of opioid prescribing (operationalized using the Continuity of Care Index) and prescriber specialty were assessed among all eligible individuals. Conditional logistic regression was conducted to assess the relationships of interest after accounting for known confounders. RESULTS: Individuals with low (odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.08-1.94) and medium (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.04-1.79) continuity of opioid prescribing were found to have greater odds of experiencing a composite outcome of opioid-related adverse events compared with individuals with high prescribing continuity. Fewer than 1 in 10 (9.2%) older adults starting a new LTOT episode received at least 1 prescription from a pain specialist. Receiving a prescription from a pain specialist was not significantly associated with the outcome in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We found that higher continuity of opioid prescribing, but not provider specialty, was significantly associated with fewer opioid-related adverse outcomes among older adults with CNCP.

Examining the context, logistics, and outcomes of food prescription programs: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Obesity and associated metabolic conditions are endemic. Finding new strategies to mitigate the impact on wellbeing and healthcare systems is critical. Food prescription programs (FPPs) have been promoted as one route to address this problem in a way that simultaneously addresses the socio-cultural context of obesity. Yet, little is known about the standard practices and logistics of using food prescription programs as an effective intervention. OBJECTIVES: To 1) identify the context in which food prescription programs are used; 2) identify implementation logistics of food prescription program; and 3) understand the scope of food prescription program outcomes. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted from October 2019 to May 2020 using Google Scholar, EBSCOhost, and AcademicOne Search to identify research articles focused on the implementation of prescription food programs in the US. Updates to articles were made in May of 2021 and May of 2022 to ensure the most up-to-date sample for analysis. There was no publication date restriction for article inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 213 articles were identified for abstract review via the search strategy, and 30 articles were included for analysis following article exclusion. Overall, there was little consistency among included articles regarding the target population, participant recruitment, delivery, and evaluation of the food prescription programs implemented. Most food prescription programs studied were associated with farmers markets, lasted less than 6 months, and utilized produce consumption and biometric data as primary outcomes measures. CONCLUSION: Significant gaps in the literature concerning the long-term effectiveness, impact on health behaviors, screening of eligible participants, and logistics for implementation were identified. Future research should focus on addressing these shortcomings in the current literature to improve the implementation, sustainability, and scaling of food prescription programs.

Do Formulation and Dose of Long-Term Opioid Therapy Contribute to Risk of Adverse Events among Older Adults?

BACKGROUND: Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is highly prevalent in older adults and long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) has been used to manage chronic pain. However, the safety of LTOT among older adults with CNCP is not well-established and there is a need to identify therapy-related risk factors of opioid-related adverse events among older adults. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between opioid dose and formulation and the risk of opioid-related adverse events among Medicare-eligible older adults on LTOT. DESIGN: Nested case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: Older Medicare beneficiaries (N=35,189) who received > 3 opioid prescriptions with a total days-supply of >45 days within a 90-day period for CNCP between 2012 and 2016. MAIN MEASURES: This study utilized Medicare 5% medical and prescription claims data. Outcome measures included opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD), opioid overdose, all-cause mortality, and a composite outcome, defined as the first occurrence of any of the previous three events. Key independent variables were opioid formulation and opioid dose (measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME)) prescribed during LTOT. KEY RESULTS: Seventy-four OIRD, 133 overdose, 982 all-cause mortality, and 1122 composite outcome events were observed during follow-up. In unadjusted analyses, the use of combination opioids (OR: 4.52 [95%CI: 1.51-13.47]) was significantly associated with OIRD compared to short-acting (SA) opioids. In adjusted analyses, opioid-related adverse events were significantly associated with the use of LA (overdose OR: 13.00 [95%CI: 1.30-130.16] and combination opioids (overdose OR: 6.27 [95%CI: 1.91-20.55]; mortality OR: 2.75 [95%CI: 1.87-4.04]; composite OR: 2.82 [95%CI: 2.01-3.96]) when compared to SA opioids. When compared to an average dose of less than 20 MME, outcomes were significantly associated with doses of 20-50 MME (mortality OR: 1.61 [95%CI: 1.24-2.10]; composite OR: 1.59 [95%CI: 1.26-2.01]) and >50 MME (mortality OR: 1.99 [95%CI: 1.28-3.10]; composite OR: 2.09 [95%CI: 1.43-3.04]). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults receiving medically prescribed opioids at higher doses and those using LA and combination of LA and SA opioids are at increased risks for opioid-related adverse events, highlighting the need for close patient supervision.

Patient Centered Studies Focused on Type 2 Diabetes Management, Education, and Family Support: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Although a large amount of research has been conducted in diabetes management, many of the articles do not focus on patient-centered questions and concerns. To address this shortcoming, patients and various other stakeholders from three northern Mississippi communities co-created research questions focused on Type 2 diabetes management. OBJECTIVE: To identify the diabetes management literature pertaining to each of the six patient-developed research questions from March 2010 to July 2020. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted via PubMed to identify research articles from March 2010 to July 2020 focused on patient-centered Type 2 diabetes studies relevant to the six research questions. RESULTS: A total of 1,414 studies were identified via the search strategy and 34 were included for qualitative analysis following article exclusion. For one of the research questions, there were no articles included. For the remaining research questions, the number of articles identified ranged from two to eleven. After analysis of the included articles, it was found that these questions either lacked extensive data or had not been implemented in the practice of diabetes management. CONCLUSION: Additional research is warranted for three of the five questions, as current evidence is either lacking or contradictory. In the remaining two questions, it seems that adequate current research exists to warrant transitioning to implementation focused studies wherein data may be generated to improve sustainability and scaling of current programming.

Does Transient Opioid Use Increase Risk of Short-Term Respiratory Exacerbation among Older Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?

The objective of this study was to examine the association between transient opioid use and acute respiratory exacerbations among older Medicare beneficiaries with COPD. This study was conducted using national Medicare 5% sample administrative claims data between 2012 and 2016 and employed a case-crossover design. The date of eligible COPD exacerbation events was defined as the index date and the presence of opioid prescriptions during a 7-day exposure window prior to index date was compared to a set of 10 control periods, each 7-days long. The association between opioid exposure and COPD exacerbation was estimated using a conditional logistic regression with robust sandwich estimators, after accounting for known time-varying confounders. Among 16,290 eligible COPD exacerbations included in the study sample, the average patient age was 77.08 years, and 64.2% of events occurred in women. Transient exposure to opioids was associated with a 76% increase in the odds of an acute COPD exacerbation (OR: 1.76, 95%CI: 1.67-1.84), and each 25 mg increase in morphine milligram equivalent dose was associated with a 18% increase in the odds of exacerbation (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.15-1.21). Effect estimates were consistent across subgroup analyses conducted among events identified in the emergency department versus hospital, and among individuals with a single exacerbation event versus those with multiple exacerbations. Transient exposure to opioids was associated with an increased short-term risk of respiratory exacerbation among older adults with COPD. Treatment decisions for breathlessness among individuals with COPD need to account for the benefit-risk profile of opioids.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2021.2013460 .

Patterns of Long-Term Prescription Opioid Use Among Older Adults in the United States: A Study of Medicare Administrative Claims Data.

BACKGROUND: Long-term opioid therapy was prescribed with increasing frequency over the past decade. However, factors surrounding long-term use of opioids in older adults remains poorly understood, probably because older people are not at the center stage of the national opioid crisis. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the annual utilization and trends in long-term opioid use among older adults in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Data from Medicare-enrolled older adults. METHODS: This study utilized a nationally representative sample of Medicare administrative claims data from the years 2012 to 2016 containing records of health care services for more than 2.3 million Medicare beneficiaries each year. Medicare beneficiaries who were 65 years of age or older and who were enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D, but not Part C, for at least 10 months in a year were included in the study. We measured annual utilization and trends in new long-term opioid use episodes over 4 years (2013-2016). We examined claims records for the demographic characteristics of the eligible individuals and for the presence of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), cancer, and other comorbidities. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2016, administrative claims of approximately 2.3 million elderly Medicare beneficiaries were analyzed in each year with a majority of them being women (~56%) and white (~82%) with a mean age of approximately 75 years. The proportion of all eligible beneficiaries with at least one new opioid prescription increased from 6.64% in 2013, peaked at 10.32% in 2015, and then decreased to 8.14% in 2016. The proportion of individuals with long-term opioid use among those with a new opioid prescription was 12.40% in 2013 and 10.20% in 2016. Among new long-term opioid users, the proportion of beneficiaries with a cancer diagnosis during the study years increased from 13.30% in 2013 to 15.67% in 2016, and the proportion with CNCP decreased from 30.25% in 2013 to 27.36% in 2016. Across all years, long-term opioid use was consistently high in the Southern states followed by the Midwest region. LIMITATIONS: This study used Medicare fee-for-service administrative claims data to capture prescription fill patterns, which do not allow for the capture of individuals enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans, cash prescriptions, or for the evaluation of appropriateness of prescribing, or the actual use of medication. This study only examined long-term use episodes among patients who were defined as opioid-naive. Finally, estimates captured for 2016 could only utilize data from 9 months of the year to capture 90-day long-term-use episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Using a national sample of elderly Medicare beneficiaries, we observed that from 2013 to 2016 the use of new prescription opioids increased from 2013 to 2014 and peaked in 2015. The use of new long-term prescription opioids peaked in 2014 and started to decrease from 2015 and 2016. Future research needs to evaluate the impact of the changes in new and long-term prescription opioid use on population health outcomes.

Association Between Work Absence and Health Services Utilization and Costs Among Employed Individuals With Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether work absence is associated with increased health services utilization and health care costs among employed individuals with arthritis. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study using pooled data from the 2011 to 2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Employed individuals with arthritis were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9) codes and Clinical Classification code. Generalized linear models were used to analyze utilization and costs outcomes. RESULTS: Individuals with arthritis who reported work absences had greater odds of having a hospitalization event (odds ratio [OR]: 9.198, P < 0.001), higher number of ambulatory care visits (ß = 0.549, P < 0.001), and had higher total health care costs (ß = 0.40, P < 0.001) and arthritis-related costs (ß = 0.035, P < 0.0002) compared with individuals without work absences. CONCLUSION: Among employed individuals with arthritis, self-reported work absence is associated with significantly higher health care utilization and health care costs.

Patient Centered Studies Focusing on Diabetes Self-Management: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes continues to be a significant burden to patients and health systems globally. Addressing this condition from an alternative perspective, patients and various other stakeholders from three northern Mississippi communities co-created patient-centered research questions focused on type 2 diabetes management. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review was to explore current literature focusing on nine patient- centered research questions to establish current knowledge and identify future research needs in the area of type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted to obtain an overview of research related to the study purpose. The PubMed database was searched from March 2013 to March 2018 to identify patient-centered studies focused on type 2 diabetes and relevant to one of the nine research questions. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies were identified and included. For five of the research questions, there was either no previous research literature or only "related" studies could be identified. These largely unexplored topics included how the understanding of guidelines by healthcare providers, specialty, and communication of medication side-effects impact patients' understanding and outcomes, the impact of improving patients' preparedness to communicate with providers, and whether younger patients require weight management programs that account for this populations' needs. CONCLUSION: This lack of previous literature presents a unique opportunity to partner with patients to conduct this study and help improve the management of type 2 diabetes.