Pilot Trial on Awake Surgery for Low-Grade Arteriovenous Malformations in Speech Area and Systematic Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: One of the pressing constraints in the treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVM) is the potential development of new neurologic deficits, mainly when the AVM is in an eloquent area. The risk of ischemia when an en passage arterial supply is present is not negligible. In this regard, awake surgery holds promise in increasing the safety of low-grade AVM resection. METHODS: We conducted a pilot trial on 3 patients with low-grade AVMs affecting speech areas to evaluate the safety of awake craniotomy using Conscious Sedation. Each feeder was temporarily clipped before the section. Also, we performed a systematic review to analyze the existing data about the impact of awake surgery in eloquent AVM resection. RESULTS: None of the 3 patients presented with neurologic deficits after the procedure. Awake craniotomy was useful in 1 case, as it allowed the detection of speech arrest during the temporal clipping of 1 of the feeders. This vessel was identified as an en passage vessel, closer to the nidus. The second attempt revealed the feeder of the AVM, which was sectioned. Systematic review yielded 7 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Twenty-six of 33 patients included in these studies presented with AVM affecting speech area. Only 2 studies included the motor evoked potentials. Six studies used direct cortical and subcortical stimulation. In all studies the asleep-awake-asleep technique was used. CONCLUSIONS: Awake craniotomies are safe procedures and may be helpful in avoiding ischemic complications in low-grade AVMs, either affecting eloquent areas and/or when en passage feeders are present.

Does Endovascular Treatment with Curative Intention Have Benefits for Treating High-Grade Arteriovenous Malformation versus Radiosurgery? Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of high-grade arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains challenging. Microsurgery provides a rapid and complete occlusion compared with other options but is associated with undesirable morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the occlusion rates, incidence of unfavorable outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as a curative treatment for high-grade AVMs. METHODS: A retrospective series of 57 consecutive patients with high-grade AVM treated with embolization or SRS, with the aim of achieving complete occlusion, was analyzed. Demographic, clinical, and angioarchitectonic variables were collected. Both treatments were compared for the occlusion rate and procedure-related complications. In addition, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. RESULTS: Thirty patients (52.6%) were men and 27 (47.4%) were women (mean age, 39 years). AVMs were unruptured in 43 patients (75.4%), and ruptured in 14 patients (24.6%). The presence of deep venous drainage, nidus volume, perforated arterial supply, and eloquent localization was more frequent in the SRS group. Complications such as hemorrhage or worsening of previous seizures were more frequent in the embolization group. No significant differences were observed in the occlusion rates or in the time necessary to achieve occlusion between the groups. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for endovascular treatment versus SRS was $53.279. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques achieved similar occlusion rates, but SRS carried a lower risk of complications. Staged embolization may be associated with a greater risk of hemorrhage, whereas SRS was shown to have a better cost-effectiveness ratio. These results support SRS as a better treatment option for high-grade AVMs.

Primary bilateral fronto-temporoparietal decompressive craniectomy-An alternative treatment for severe traumatic brain injury: Case report and technical note.

Bilateral fronto-temporoparietal decompressive craniectomy provides bigger area of the decompression that decreases the brain tissue herniation; therefore, it leads to a decrease in the neuronal stretching effect that is probably related to functional outcomes.

Glioblastoma after AVM radiosurgery. Case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is considered to be a relatively safe procedure in cerebral arteriovenous malformation management. There are very few reported cases of SRS-associated/induced malignancies. METHODS: We show the case of a 21-year-old female who presented with a 21-mm(3) ruptured AVM in the right mesial frontocallosal region. Embolization and/or radiosurgery was proposed. She preferred radiosurgery. The AVM was treated with CyberKnife(®) SRS. RESULTS: She presented behavior changes 6 years after SRS. MRI showed a right subcortical frontal lesion with increased perfusion, more consistent with high-grade glioma. The lesion's center was within the irradiated region of the previous SRS, having received an estimated radiation dose of 4 Gy. Pathological examination noted a hypercellular tumor showing astrocytic tumor cells with moderate pleomorphism in a fibrillary background, endothelial proliferation, and tumor necrosis surrounded by perinecrotic pseudopalisades. Numerous mitotic figures were seen. The appearances were those of glioblastoma, WHO grade IV, with neuronal differentiation. SRS-associated/-induced GBM after treatment of a large AM is exceptional. SRS-associated/-induced malignancies are mostly GBMs and occur on average after a latency of 9.4 years, within very low-dose peripheral regions as well as the full-dose regions; 33.3 % of patients were under 20 years at the time of SRS, and in 66 % the lesion treated was a vascular pathology. CONCLUSION: Although it is unlikely that the risk of radiation-induced cancer will change the current standard of practice, patients must be warned of this potential possibility before treatment.