Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Infect Public Health ; 5(4): 297-303, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23021652

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of educational activities on the rates and frequencies of percutaneous injuries (PIs) at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: PI surveillance is a routine activity in King Abdulaziz Medical City (a 900-bed teaching tertiary health care hospital) in Riyadh using the Exposure Prevention Information Network (EPINet) data collection tool. From 2001 through 2003, educational activities were conducted for health care workers (HCWs) to prevent PIs. The education included lectures on the risk of unsafe practices that may lead to PIs and how to avoid them. Data from before (1997-2000) and after (2004-2008) the intervention were imported from our surveillance system and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The total overall rate of PIs per 1000 HCWs was significantly lower in the post-intervention period than in the pre-intervention period (14 vs. 32.8/1000 HCWs, respectively). The rates of PIs among nurses and housekeepers showed a significant decrease (15 vs. 37.6/1000 HCWs and 10 vs. 34.5/1000 HCWs, respectively). The frequency of PIs in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care units (ICUs) showed a significant decrease (3.4% for both vs. 12.4% and 13.7%, respectively). PIs associated with devices, such as needles on IV lines, IV catheters, lancets and suture needles, showed a significant decrease. PIs occurring during device disassembly and from inappropriately discarded devices also decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: The educational program reduced some categories of PIs, including the overall rate, the rate among nurses and housekeepers, the frequency in the ED and ICUs and the frequency among needles on IV lines, IV catheters, lancets and suture needles. Other PI categories did not change significantly.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Continuing/statistics & numerical data , Infection Control/methods , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Needlestick Injuries/prevention & control , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Occupational Injuries/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Humans , Prevalence , Saudi Arabia , Tertiary Care Centers
2.
Semin Dial ; 24(4): 460-5, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21781172

ABSTRACT

Comparison of Saudi patients with chronic hemodialysis to an international benchmark was not performed before. We conducted a prospective surveillance study for all end-stage kidney disease patients served by the hemodialysis unit at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) in Riyadh, SA, between May 2008 and December 2009. US National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions were used for comparison. Among 227 patients with adverse events, 55% were women and their age was 60.2 ± 20.2 years. Events recorded included 339 all-cause hospitalizations, 302 outpatient start of intravenous antimicrobials, and 174 access-associated bacteremias. In comparison with NHSN, hospitalization rate per 100 patient-months was lower (8.6 vs. 10.7, p < 0.001), rates of both antimicrobial start (7.6 vs. 3.5, p < 0.001) and access-associated bacteremia (4.4 vs. 1.3, p < 0.001) were higher, and blood cultures were more likely to grow gram-negative rods (47.9% vs. 21.3%, p < 0.001). Similar to NHSN, permanent catheter was associated with highest, while arterio-venous fistula was associated with lowest event rates, irrespective of event type. KAMC had 2-4 times higher rates of access-associated bacteremia and antimicrobial start as well as a higher catheter prevalence (42% vs. 31%). The lower hospitalization may indicate good control of comorbidities at outpatient level or underutilization of inpatient services.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Saudi Arabia , United States , Young Adult
3.
Am J Infect Control ; 39(7): 560-5, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21636172

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite recent improvements in policies, practices, and device design, percutaneous injuries (PIs) from needles and sharp instruments continue to expose health care workers to the risk of bloodborne pathogens. METHODS: Prospective surveillance was instituted to study the epidemiologic characteristics of PIs at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (KAMC-R) from 2004 through 2008 and to benchmark these characteristics relative to those of a network of US hospitals participating in the Exposure Prevention Information Network (EPINet) research group (2004-2007). RESULTS: The mean PIs rate per 100 daily occupied beds in KAMC-R was significantly lower than that reported by teaching and nonteaching US EPINet hospitals. Similar to US EPINet hospitals, nurses at KAMC-R reported more PIs than physicians. Compared with US EPINet hospitals, nurses at KAMC-R experienced more PIs (52.8% vs 38.1%, respectively), whereas physicians experienced fewer PIs (18.4% vs 28.6%, respectively). The majority of PIs happened in patient wards (50.6%) in KAMC-R and operating rooms (34.1%) in US EPINet hospitals. Suturing, which was involved in only 10% of PIs at KAMC-R, was the most frequent PIs mechanism in US EPINet hospitals (23.3%). In both KAMC-R and US EPINet hospitals, disposable syringes were the most frequent devices involved, the left hand was the most common site of injury, and the source patient was largely identifiable. CONCLUSION: We have lower rates of PIs at KAMC-R relative to US EPINet hospitals. Whereas it is difficult to fully explain such differences, this could be due to variations in health care systems, underreporting, or the impact of the PIs prevention activities.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking/methods , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Skin/injuries , Blood-Borne Pathogens , Hospitals , Humans , Information Services , Occupational Health , Personnel, Hospital , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , United States
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 31(10): 1004-10, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20804374

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Certain emerging infections, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome and avian influenza, represent a great risk to healthcare workers (HCWs). There are few data about the epidemiology of H1N1 influenza among HCWs. METHODS: We conducted a prospective surveillance study for all HCWs at King Abdulaziz Medical City (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) who were confirmed positive for H1N1 influenza by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from June 1 through November 30, 2009. RESULTS: During 6 months of surveillance, 526 HCWs were confirmed positive for H1N1 influenza. The distribution of these cases showed 2 clear outbreaks: an initial outbreak (peak at early August) and a shorter second wave (peak at end of October). Among all PCR-confirmed cases, the attack rate was significantly higher in clinical HCWs than in nonclinical HCWs (6.0% vs 4.3%; P < .001) and in HCWs in emergency departments than in HCWs in other hospital locations (17.4% vs 5.0%, P < .001). The percentage of HCWs who received regular influenza vaccination was greater for clinical HCWs than for nonclinical HCWs (46.2% vs 24.6%; P < .001). The majority of HCWs with confirmed H1N1 influenza were young (mean age + or - standard deviation, 34.5 + or - 9.5 years), not Saudi (58.4%), female (55.1%), and nurses (36.1%). Approximately 4% of women who were less than 50 years old were pregnant. Reported exposures included contact with a case (41.0%), contact with a sick household member (23.8%), and recent travel history (13.3%). Respiratory symptoms (98.0%), including cough (90.1%), were the most frequently reported symptoms, followed by muscle aches (66.2%), fever (62.5%), headache (57.9%), diarrhea (16.5%), and vomiting (9.8%). None of these HCWs died, and all recovered fully without hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the vulnerability of HCWs, whether clinical or nonclinical, to emerging H1N1 influenza.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Health Personnel , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Population Surveillance/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Prospective Studies , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...