Does intrathecal morphine in the treatment of cancer pain induce the development of tolerance?

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study was designed to investigate whether chronic lumbar intrathecal administration of morphine leads to the development of opioid tolerance in patients suffering from intractable cancer pain. METHODS: Between 1978 and 1995, 159 patients with refractory cancer pain were treated with intrathecal morphine in our Multidisciplinary Pain Center. The treatment consisted of preservative-free morphine administered through an access port as a single bolus. In this series of patients (n = 159), the daily doses of intrathecal morphine were determined as a function of duration of follow-up. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 95 days (range, 5-909 d), the mean starting daily dose of intrathecal morphine was 2.69 mg (range, 1-7.5 mg), and the mean terminal dose was 7.82 mg (range, 1-80 mg). The results demonstrated that only a moderate increase in daily dose of intrathecal morphine was required during the course of treatment (a two- to threefold increase for a 3-mo period). Furthermore, the dose increment was similar for patients followed up for more or less than 60 days. This increase did not result in any central opioid-related side effects, and the pain was managed satisfactorily. CONCLUSION: The requirement for a moderate increase in intrathecal opioid doses reflects the development of tolerance but did not limit the patients' ability to obtain adequate analgesia during the course of their painful disease.

Effect of intraperitoneal insulin delivery on growth hormone binding protein, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, and IGF-binding protein-3 in IDDM.

Low plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I despite high circulating growth hormone (GH) in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) indicate a hepatic GH resistance. This state may be reflected by the reduction of the circulating GH binding protein (GHBP), corresponding to the extracellular domain of the GH receptor, and the reduction of insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-3, major IGF-I binding protein, upregulated by GH. We carried out two studies. In the first, plasma GHBP activity was compared in patients with IDDM on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or on conventional therapy and in healthy subjects. In the second study, the 18 patients on CSII at baseline were then treated by continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion with an implantable pump (CPII) and prospectively studied for GH-IGF-I axis. Although HbA1c was lower in patients on CSII than in those on conventional therapy, GHBP was similarly reduced in both when compared to control subjects (10.2 +/- 0.8 and 11.6 +/- 0.9% vs 21.0 +/- 1.3, p < 0.01). CPII for 12 months resulted in: a slight and transient improvement in HbA1c (Time (T)0: 7.6 +/- 0.2%, T3: 7.1 +/- 0.2%, T12: 7.5 +/- 0.2%, p < 0.02), improvement in GHBP (T0: 10.2 +/- 0.8%, T12: 15.5 +/- 1.5, p < 0.0001), near-normalization of IGF-I (T0: 89.4 +/- 8.8 ng/ml, T12: 146.9 +/- 15.6, p < 0.002) and normalization of IGFBP-3 (T0: 1974 +/- 121 ng/ml, T12: 3534 +/- 305, p < 0.0001). The hepatic GH resistance profile in IDDM does not seem to be related to glycaemic control, but partly to insufficient portal insulinization. Intraperitoneal insulin delivery, allowing primary portal venous absorption, may influence GH sensitivity, and improve hepatic IGF-I and IGFBP-3 generation.

Insulin therapy and GH-IGF-I axis disorders in diabetes: impact of glycaemic control and hepatic insulinization.

In Type 1 diabetes, high circulating growth hormone (GH) in conjunction with low plasma insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) is indicative of a hepatic GH-resistance profile since the liver is the main source of circulating IGF-I. The reduction in specific growth hormone binding protein (GHBP), corresponding to the extracellular domain of the GH receptor, provides an indirect indication of the hepatic density of GH receptors, as does the reduction in IGFBP-3, the major IGF binding protein, which is GH-dependent. Type 1 diabetes is also associated with high levels of IGFBP-1, a binding protein down-regulated by insulin. Although most of these abnormalities have been described in situations of poor glycaemic control, hyperglycaemia does not seem to be the predominant factor in their pathogenesis. Even intensified subcutaneous insulin therapy does not normalize GH, IGF-I, GHBP and IGFBP-3 plasma levels. Some indirect evidence suggests that portal insulinopenia plays a role in the hepatic GH-resistance profile of Type 1 diabetes, i.e. discrepancies between the abnormalities reported in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, and the inverse relationship between residual insulin secretion in Type 1 diabetes and some of these abnormalities. Intraperitoneal insulin therapy administered to Type 1 diabetic patients by implantable pumps (without modification of glycaemic control) can improve GHBP activity, practically normalize plasma IGF-I and normalize IGFBP-3. The improvement in GH-IGF-I axis disorders obtained with intraperitoneal insulin therapy (which allows primary portal insulin absorption) provides direct evidence of the central role of portal insulin in the regulation of this system.

Differential regulation of serum growth hormone (GH)-binding protein during continuous infusion versus daily injection of recombinant human GH in GH-deficient children.

Serum GH-binding protein (GHBP) was evaluated in 2 randomly divided groups of prepubertal children presenting with idiopathic GH deficiency and receiving recombinant human GH, either continuously by sc infusion (group 1) or as 1 daily sc injection (group 2). After the first 6 months, group 1 switched from continuous infusion to daily injections for the following 6 months. There was no significant difference in clinical data, GH values, or GHBP levels between the 2 groups before treatment. During the first 6 months, GHBP levels increased in all except 1 of the 8 children in group 1 from 8.6% to 16.9% after 3 months and 22.5% after 6 months. The increment factor ranged from 1.1-7.9, with wide individual variations. In group 2, the mean variation in GHBP was from 8.3-8.2% after 3 months and 10.7% after 6 months. Only 2 of the 10 children in this group showed a significant increase in GHBP levels. During the second period, group 1 maintained their GHBP levels, whereas the 2 children in group 2 tended to a continued increase in their GHBP levels. There was no correlation with the increase in growth velocity, as children in both groups grew equally well, but higher insulin-like growth factor-I levels were found in group 1, although the difference between the two groups was not significant. These data show that GH can increase GHBP levels and that there is a differential effect depending on the mode of GH administration, although the reason for and the role of such regulation remains to be explained.

CSF baclofen levels after intrathecal administration in severe spasticity.

The pharmacokinetic parameters in the CSF of baclofen given to 4 patients as an intrathecal bolus are reported. Considerable inter-individual variability in the parameters was observed. The elimination half-life ranged from 0.9 to 5 h and the clearance from 0.013 to 0.08 l.h-1. In order to optimize treatment, it is suggested that CSF baclofen levels be matched to changes in Hoffman's monosynaptic reflex (H reflex).

Chronic intrathecal baclofen administration for control of severe spasticity.

Baclofen, the most effective drug for treating spasticity, is a specific agonist of gamma-aminobutyric acid-B receptors, and is very abundant in the superficial layers of the spinal cord. Given orally, baclofen does not easily penetrate the blood-brain barrier, and is distributed equally to the brain and spinal cord. Direct intrathecal administration was given in order to change the distribution of the drug by preferentially perfusing the spinal cord. Eighteen patients presenting a severe spastic syndrome were treated with chronic intrathecal infusion of baclofen in the lumbar cerebrospinal fluid. After clinical preselection, 38 patients were implanted with a lumbar access port allowing long-term trials in order to determine the efficacy of baclofen therapy and the effective 12-hour dose. The 18 patients selected for chronic administration were implanted with a programmable pump. The pathology in these cases was: multiple sclerosis (6 cases), posttrauma spastic syndrome (eight cases), and (one case each) cerebral palsy, ischemic cerebral lesion, spinal ischemia, and transverse myelitis. The mean follow-up period was 18 months (range 4 to 43 months). The clinical results were evaluated according to muscular hypertony on Ashworth's scale (changed for occurrence of painful spasms) and functional improvement. Results were better for spastic syndrome secondary to traumatic medullary lesion than for demyelinating disease. Hypertonia was improved in all cases as confirmed by the registration of the Hoffman (H) reflex. Painful muscular spasms disappeared in 14 of the 16 affected patients. Significant functional improvement was noted in nine patients and was considerable in three. The risk of side effects secondary to overdose (such as excessive hypotonia or central depression) and the absence of a specific baclofen antagonist stresses the necessity for accurate determination of the efficient dose. After an initial titration period and adjustment of the therapeutic dose, the individual doses were from 21 to 500 micrograms/24 hrs (mean 160 micrograms/24 hrs). This new conservative method is very effective, perfectly reversible, and safe when administered in conditions favorable to its use.