ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We directly compared CTC detection rates and prognostic significance, using three different methods in patients with breast cancer (BC). METHODS: Early (n=200) and metastatic (n=164) patients were evaluated before initiating adjuvant or first-line chemotherapy, using the CellSearchTM System, an RT-qPCR for CK-19 mRNA detection and by double immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy using A45-B/B3 and CD45 antibodies. RESULTS: Using the CellSearchTM System, 37% and 16.5% of early BC patients were CTC-positive (at ≥1 and ≥2 CTCs/23 ml of blood), 18.0% by RT-qPCR and 16.9% by IF; no agreement was observed between methods. By the CellSearchTM 34.8% and 53.7% (at≥ 5 and ≥ 2 CTCs/7.5 ml) of metastatic patients were CTC-positive, 37.8% by RT-qPCR and 28.5% by IF. A significant agreement existed only between the CellSearchTM and RT-qPCR. In 60.8% of cases, differential EpCAM and CK-19 expression on CTCs by IF could explain the discrepancies between the CellSearchTM and RT-qPCR. CTC-positivity by either method was associated with decreased overall survival in metastatic patients. CONCLUSION: A significant concordance was observed between the CellSearchTM and RT-qPCR in metastatic but not in early BC. Discordant results could be explained in part by CTC heterogeneity. CTC detection by all methods evaluated had prognostic relevance in metastatic patients.
