ABSTRACT
Hundreds of oral and injectable generic drugs have seen dramatic price increases during the 2010s. Several reasons for the astronomic price increases have been postulated, ranging from reduced competition, shortages in the manufacturing supply chain, very small markets, market consolidation, the Unapproved Drugs Initiative of 2006, and unanticipated manufacturing safety issues. In one survey, over 90% of hospital administrators reported that higher drug prices had a moderate or severe impact on their budgets. Whereas compounding pharmacies may present an effective solution to high drug prices, it is a potentially dangerous one, as the case of New England Compounding Center makes clear. The risks make a meticulous vetting process necessary.
Subject(s)
Drug Costs/trends , Drugs, Generic/economics , Commerce , Drug Industry , Economics, Pharmaceutical , Humans , Inflation, Economic , New EnglandSubject(s)
Drugs, Generic/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Drug Costs , Inflation, Economic , United StatesABSTRACT
Hundreds of oral and injectable generic drugs have seen dramatic price increases during the 2010s. Several reasons for the astronomic price increases have been postulated, ranging from reduced competition, shortages in the manufacturing supply chain, very small markets, market consolidation, the Unapproved Drugs Initiative of 2006, and unanticipated manufacturing safety issues. In one survey, over 90% of hospital administrators reported that higher drug prices had a moderate or severe impact on their budgets. Whereas compounding pharmacies may present an effective solution to high drug prices, it is a potentially dangerous one, as the case of New England Compounding Center makes clear. The risks make a meticulous vetting process necessary.
Subject(s)
Drug Compounding/economics , Drug Costs/trends , Drugs, Generic/economics , Inflation, Economic/trends , Cost Control , HumansABSTRACT
The low molecular weigh heparins (LMWHs) are primarily eliminated renally, and current literature indicates that there is a reduction in clearance and an increase in half-life of LMWHs in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with elevated anti-Xa levels and an increased risk of bleeding. It therefore becomes clinically prudent to evaluate dosing adjustments in CKD. The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), in its 2008 consensus statement, recommends 5 possible approaches to dosing LMWH in patients with severe CKD. In evaluating the individual compounds, enoxaparin, dalteparin, and tinzaparin, this article attempts to address the preferred dosing strategies.
