Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Proc Biol Sci ; 283(1824)2016 Feb 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26865301

ABSTRACT

During the Pleistocene, Australia and New Guinea supported a rich assemblage of large vertebrates. Why these animals disappeared has been debated for more than a century and remains controversial. Previous synthetic reviews of this problem have typically focused heavily on particular types of evidence, such as the dating of extinction and human arrival, and have frequently ignored uncertainties and biases that can lead to misinterpretation of this evidence. Here, we review diverse evidence bearing on this issue and conclude that, although many knowledge gaps remain, multiple independent lines of evidence point to direct human impact as the most likely cause of extinction.


Subject(s)
Birds/physiology , Extinction, Biological , Mammals/physiology , Reptiles/physiology , Animals , Australia , Humans , New Guinea , Paleontology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL