Sequential RAS mutations evaluation in cell-free DNA of patients with tissue RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the PERSEIDA (Cohort 2) study.

PURPOSE: RAS (KRAS/NRAS) mutational status on a tumor biopsy is mandatory to guide the best treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Determining the RAS mutational status by tumor-tissue biopsy is essential in guiding the optimal treatment decision for mCRC. RAS mutations are negative predictive factors for the use of EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis enables minimally invasive monitoring of tumor evolution. METHODS/PATIENTS: PERSEIDA was an observational, prospective study assessing cfDNA RAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations (using Idylla™) in first-line mCRC, RAS wild-type (baseline tumor-tissue biopsy) patients (cohort 2). Plasma samples were collected before first-line treatment, after 20 ± 2 weeks, and at disease progression. RESULTS: 117 patients were included (103 received panitumumab + chemotherapy as first-line treatment). At baseline, 7 (6.8%) patients had RAS mutations, 4 (3.9%) BRAF mutations and no EGFR mutations were detected (cfDNA, panitumumab + chemotherapy subpopulation [panitumumab + Ch]). The baseline RAS mutational status concordance between tissue and liquid biopsies was 94.0% (93.2%, panitumumab + Ch). At 20 weeks, only one patient in the study (included in the panitumumab + Ch) had an emerging cfDNA RAS mutation. No emerging BRAF or EGFR mutations were reported. At disease progression, 6 patients had emergent mutations not present at baseline (RAS conversion rate: 13.3% [6/45]; 15.0% [6/40], panitumumab + Ch). CONCLUSIONS: The concordance rate between liquid and solid biopsies at baseline was very high, as previously reported, while our results suggest a considerable emergence of RAS mutations during disease progression. Thus, the dynamics of the genomic landscape in ctDNA may provide relevant information for the management of mCRC patients.

Selection of neoadjuvant treatment based on the 21-GENE test results in luminal breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an optimal option in early breast cancer, but in ER-positive/HER2-negative (luminal) is still controversial, although a survival benefit has recently been observed when a histological response by Symmans' method type 0 or I is achieved. The 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® assay (Oncotype DX®) is a validated test to assess the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients but its role in the neoadjuvant setting is less established. We analyzed the results of the Oncotype DX® test in a cohort of 122 consecutive patients selected to receive NAC based on classical clinicopathological parameters and the correlation between the Oncotype DX® results and the pathological response assessed by Symmans' method. Median age was 56.5 (range 31-84) years. Initial tumor size was T1 (<20 mm) in 46 patients (37.7%), 57 (46.7%) had a T2 tumor (20-50 mm), and 19 (15.6%) had a tumor size more than 50 mm. 59 (48.4%) had axillary node involvement. The median expression estrogen and progesteron receptors by immunohistochemistry was 280 and 120 respectively and median Ki67 index was 28%. The Recurrence Score (RS) results were <11 in 21 patients (17.2%) patients, RS 11 to 25 in 58 (47.5%), and RS > 25 in 43 (35.2%). Considering the Oncotype DX test results, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 60 patients (49%), 11 (9%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and 51 (42%) no chemotherapy. Testing with the assay has therefore led to 42% fewer chemotherapy treatments. Among 60 patients receiving NAC, pathologic response was achieved for 5 patients (8.3%) with RCB-0 and 15 RCB-1 (25%). We did not find any pathological response RCB-0 and RCB-I in the 20 patients who received NAC and had a Recurrence Score result <21 for the premenopausal group, or a RS result <25 for the postmenopausal group. For patients with highest Recurrence Score results (RS > 21 or 25 according to menopausal status) it was 12% (5/40) RCB-0 and 40% (16/40) RCB-I. CONCLUSIONS: The Oncotype DX test could be a useful tool to select patients candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be avoided in 42% of patients. We found a correlation between Recurrence Score results and pathological response with 14% of RCB-0 and a total of 47% of significant pathological response type RCB-0 and RCB-I in patients with highest Recurrence Score results. Interestingly, patients with a Recurrence Score result inferior to 32 did not get any histological response type 0 and only 5% RCB-I.

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFOX plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and ≥3 circulating tumour cells: the randomised phase III VISNÚ-1 trial.

PURPOSE: 5-Fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus bevacizumab is more effective than doublets plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, but is not widely used because of concerns about toxicity and lack of predictive biomarkers. This study was designed to explore the role of circulating tumour cell (CTC) count as a biomarker to select patients for therapy with FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: VISNÚ-1 was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase III study in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, metastatic colorectal carcinoma and ≥3 CTC/7.5 mL blood. Patients received bevacizumab 5 mg/kg plus FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan 165 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 3200 mg/m2) or FOLFOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 then 2400 mg/m2) by intravenous administration every 2 weeks. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population comprised 349 patients (FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab, n=172; FOLFOX-bevacizumab, n=177). Median PFS was 12.4 months (95% CI 11.2 to 14.0) with FOLFOXIRI bevacizumab and 9.3 months (95% CI 8.5 to 10.7) with FOLFOX-bevacizumab (stratified HR, 0.64; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.82; p=0.0006). Grade≥3 adverse events were more common with FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab 85.3% vs 75.1% with FOLFOX-bevacizumab (p=0.0178). Treatment-related deaths occurred in 8 (4.7%) and 6 (3.4%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: First-line FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab significantly improved PFS compared with FOLFOX-bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and ≥3 CTCs at baseline, which indicate a poor prognosis. CTC count may be a useful non-invasive biomarker to assist with the selection of patients for intensive first-line therapy.

Virus del papiloma humano en cáncer de pulmón no microcítico. Impacto de mutaciones del EGFR o respuesta a erlotinib / Human Papillomavirus in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Impact of EGFR Mutations and the Response to Erlotinib

Se ha sugerido que el virus del papiloma humano (HPV) puede originar cáncer de pulmón no microcítico (NSCLC). La tasa de infección HPV es mayor en NSCLC de asiáticos, no fumadores, con adenocarcinoma o respuesta a inhibidores tirosín-cinasa del receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico (EGFR-TKI). Hemos explorado retrospectivamente la relación entre mutaciones EGFR o respuesta a EGFR-TKI e infección HPV en 40pacientes con NSCLC, considerando el impacto del sexo, de la edad, del subtipo histológico, del tabaquismo y del tipo de muestra. La tasa de infección HPV fue del 2,5%, y no influía ninguna variable analizada, aunque el escaso tamaño muestral no permite conclusiones definitivas. La tasa de infección HPV en NSCLC debería revisarse en pacientes con mutaciones EGFR o tendencia a presentarlas(AU)

It has been suggested that human papillomavirus (HPV) could participate in the development of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A higher HPV infection rate has been reported in the NSCLC samples from Asian non-smoker patients, with adenocarcinomas or responders to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). We explored a potential relationship between EGFR mutation, response to EGFR-TKI and HPV infection in Western NSCLC patients. We retrospectively analyzed 40 NSCLC samples and the impact of age, gender, histology, tobacco habit and sample type. HPV infection rate was 2.5% and it was not statistically modified by any analyzed variable, although the limited sample size did not provide definitive conclusions. The rate of HPV infection in NSCLC should be studied in patients with EGFR mutations or a tendency towards presenting them(AU)

Human papillomavirus in non-small-cell lung cancer: the impact of EGFR mutations and the response to erlotinib.

It has been suggested that human papillomavirus (HPV) could participate in the development of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A higher HPV infection rate has been reported in the NSCLC samples from Asian non-smoker patients, with adenocarcinomas or responders to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). We explored a potential relationship between EGFR mutation, response to EGFR-TKI and HPV infection in Western NSCLC patients. We retrospectively analyzed 40 NSCLC samples and the impact of age, gender, histology, tobacco habit and sample type. HPV infection rate was 2.5% and it was not statistically modified by any analyzed variable, although the limited sample size did not provide definitive conclusions. The rate of HPV infection in NSCLC should be studied in patients with EGFR mutations or a tendency towards presenting them.

Role of gamma-delta T-cells in cancer: another opening door to immunotherapy.

The gamma-delta (γδ) T-cells are a subset of T-lymphocytes characterized by the presence of a surface antigen recognition complex type 2. Those γδ T-cells represent 2-5 % of peripheral T-cells only, but they are common in organs and mucosae, acting as a first defense system in the entries to the organism. The γδ T-cells take part on immune response by direct cytolysis, development of memory phenotypes, and modulation of immune cells, and they have been implied in autoimmune disorders, immune deficiencies, infections, and tumor diseases. We reported the role of γδ T-cells in oncology, focusing in their potential applications for cancer treatment. Experimental designs and clinical trials in the treatment of solid malignancies are extensively reviewed.