Breast Cancer Index Is a Predictive Biomarker of Treatment Benefit and Outcome from Extended Tamoxifen Therapy: Final Analysis of the Trans-aTTom Study.

PURPOSE: The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) HOXB13/IL17BR (H/I) ratio predicts benefit from extended endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early-stage breast cancer. Here, we report the final analysis of the Trans-aTTom study examining BCI (H/I)'s predictive performance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: BCI results were available for 2,445 aTTom trial patients. The primary endpoint of recurrence-free interval (RFI) and secondary endpoints of disease-free interval (DFI) and disease-free survival (DFS) were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression and log-rank test. RESULTS: Final analysis of the overall study population (N = 2,445) did not show a significant improvement in RFI with extended tamoxifen [HR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-1.16; P = 0.401]. Both the overall study population and N0 group were underpowered due to the low event rate in the N0 group. In a pre-planned analysis of the N+ subset (N = 789), BCI (H/I)-High patients derived significant benefit from extended tamoxifen (9.7% absolute benefit: HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14-0.75; P = 0.016), whereas BCI (H/I)-Low patients did not (-1.2% absolute benefit; HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.76-1.64; P = 0.581). A significant treatment-to-biomarker interaction was demonstrated on the basis of RFI, DFI, and DFS (P = 0.037, 0.040, and 0.025, respectively). BCI (H/I)-High patients remained predictive of benefit from extended tamoxifen in the N+/HER2- subgroup (9.4% absolute benefit: HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.81; P = 0.047). A three-way interaction evaluating BCI (H/I), treatment, and HER2 status was not statistically significant (P = 0.849). CONCLUSIONS: Novel findings demonstrate that BCI (H/I) significantly predicts benefit from extended tamoxifen in HR+ N+ patients with HER2- disease. Moreover, BCI (H/I) demonstrates significant treatment to biomarker interaction across survival outcomes.

Analysis of the effect of various decalcification agents on the quantity and quality of nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) recovered from bone biopsies.

Molecular studies are part of standard care for cancer patients. Bone, a common and sometimes sole site of metastasis, requires decalcification for morphological examination. Many commonly used decalcification agents contain strong acids that degrade nucleic acids. The paradigm shift in oncology, with biomarker targeted therapy and gene expression profiling analysis, requires sufficient nucleic acid recovery from bone biopsy specimens. We systematically studied the effects of a spectrum of decalcification agents on the quantity and quality of RNA and DNA recovered from bone biopsies. Multiple bone biopsies of similar size and cellularity were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, randomized to various decalcification agents for 2 hours then processed, and embedded. Tissue lysates were obtained from unstained sections and nucleic acid isolated. DNA and RNA were quantified. Assessment of DNA and RNA integrity was accomplished by comparison of the average cycle threshold by polymerase chain reaction of selected housekeeping genes for each agent. Results were then analyzed by 2-sample t test. There was a significant decrease in both DNA and RNA yield and integrity with strong acids (hydrochloric, nitric) vs 14% EDTA and formic acid. DNA yield was (mean nanograms) 6.15 vs 68.68 (P<.001) and RNA was (mean nanograms) 121.53 vs 288.89 (P=.003), respectively. DNA integrity (mean cycle threshold) was 35.79 vs 30.16 (P<.001), and RNA was 33.03 vs 26.5 (P<.001), respectively. Decalcification of bone biopsies with EDTA or formic acid agents was associated with a significant improvement in recovered nucleic acid quantity and quality.