Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
2.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 59(12): 1209-1221, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27824707

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Extended mesocolic lymph node dissection in colon cancer surgery seems to improve oncological outcome. A possible reason might be related to metastases in the central mesocolic lymph nodes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the pattern of mesocolic lymph node metastases, particularly in central lymph nodes, and the risk of skip, aberrant, and gastrocolic ligament metastases as the argument for performing extended lymph node dissection. DATA SOURCES: EMBASE and PubMed were searched using the terms colon or colorectal with sentinel node, lymph node mapping, or skip node; lymph node resection colon; and complete or total and mesocolic excision. STUDY SELECTION: Studies describing the risk of metastases in central, skip, aberrant, and gastrocolic ligament lymph node metastases from colon adenocarcinomas in 10 or more patients were included. No languages were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The risk of metastases in the central mesocolic lymph nodes was measured. RESULTS: A total of 2052 articles were screened, of which 277 underwent full-text review. The 47 studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were very heterogeneous, and meta-analyses were not considered appropriate. The risk of central mesocolic lymph node metastases for right-sided cancers varies between 1% and 22%. In sigmoid cancer, the risk is reported in ≤12% of the patients and is associated with advanced T stage. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective design and heterogeneity, in terms of definitions of lymph node location, tumor sites, stage, morphology, pathology assessment, and inclusion criteria (selection bias), of the included studies were limitations. Also, anatomic definitions were not uniform. CONCLUSIONS: The present literature cannot give a theoretical explanation of a better oncological outcome after extended lymph node dissection. Consensus for a standardization of anatomical definitions and surgical and pathological assessments is warranted for future mapping studies.


Subject(s)
Colectomy/methods , Colonic Neoplasms , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Lymph Nodes , Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnosis , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Mesocolon , Risk Assessment
3.
Eur Spine J ; 24 Suppl 7: 912-7, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26458933

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sacral chordoma is a rare low-to-intermediate grade malignant tumour. The mainstay of treatment is still surgery with en bloc and wide resection margins, which can grant the best chances of a long-term control or cure of this disease. The first aim of this paper is to collect data about survival, time to local recurrence and metastasis among patients affected by sacral chordoma and primarily treated with surgery. The second aim is to analyze the influence of level resection, tumor volume and surgical margins on local recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population was composed of 14 patients treated with sacral chordoma resection at the National Tumour Institute of Naples-Pascale (Italy) from January 2000 to June 2013. The median follow-up was 84 months (range 24-132 months). The follow-up was characterized by: standard radiographs, MRI, and a CT scan of the chest annually. Time to recurrence or metastasis was calculated from the date of resection to the date of diagnosis of first recurrence or metastasis. RESULTS: Out of all the patients, six died (42.86 %) during the follow-up; 6 (42.86 %) had local recurrence; 4 (28.57 %) had metastasis. At univariate analysis wide surgical margins (R0) were associated with increased survival up to a local recurrence (OR = 0.0286; 95 % CI = 0.0014-0.5739; P = 0.026); the level of resection (OR = 3.33; 95 % CI = 0.3619-30.7025; P = 0.592) and tumour volume (P = 1) did not show a statistically significant correlation. DISCUSSION: Based on our experience, we hope all patients to be treated by surgery, the only good standard treatment of this disease. The resection should result in margins as wide as possible. For these reasons, it is essential for this disease to be treated in highly specialized centres because only a complete surgery can offer a chance to care for these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Solid survival at long-term follow-up can be achieved by a surgical resection performed with wide margins.


Subject(s)
Chordoma/surgery , Sacrum/surgery , Spinal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Chordoma/mortality , Chordoma/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Neoplasms/mortality , Spinal Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...