Predicting Limited Survival Following Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Penile Cancer: Should We Revisit the Goals of Care?

OBJECTIVE: Patients with advanced penile squamous cell cancer have a poor prognosis and can benefit from early palliative care consultation. We built a model to identify those patients most likely to benefit. METHODS: Patients with penile squamous cell cancer undergoing inguinal lymph node dissection were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and a multi-institutional international dataset (INT). A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model for overall survival (OS) was developed using the NCDB and applied to the INT dataset. Parameters were used to make receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. ROC-related criteria were optimized to identify a predictive probability cut point and dichotomize patients from INT into risk groups for limited OS of <6 and <12 months. RESULTS: NCDB had 860 deaths; 105 (5%) at 6 months and 296 (15%) at 12 months. INT had 257 deaths; 56 (8%) at 6 months and 124 (18%) at 12 months. Limited OS was associated with older age, greater T and N stage, and fewer lymph nodes removed. Optimized ROC criteria using the OS <6 months curve best dichotomized INT patients into high-risk group with median OS of 24 months (95% CI 18-34) and low-risk group with median OS of 174 months (95% CI 120-NE). CONCLUSION: We developed a simple model that could be used as a screening tool for early palliative care referral.

Bilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection vs. unilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection and dynamic sentinel node biopsy in clinical N1 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the role of unilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection (ILND) plus contralateral dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) vs. bilateral ILND in clinical N1 (cN1) penile squamous cell carcinoma (peSCC) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within our institutional database (1980-2020, included), we identified 61 consecutive cT1-4 cN1 cM0 patients with histological confirmed peSCC who underwent either unilateral ILND plus DSNB (26) or bilateral ILND (35). RESULTS: Median age was 54 years (Interquartile range [IQR]: 48-60 years). Median follow-up was 68 months (IQR 21-105 months). Most patients had pT1 (23 %) or pT2 (54.1%), as well as G2 (47.5%) or G3 (23%) tumors, while lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was present in 67.1% of cases. Considering a cN1 and a cN0 groin, overall 57 out of 61 patients (93.5%) had nodal disease in the cN1 groin. Conversely, only 14 out of 61 patients (22.9%) had nodal disease in the cN0 groin. 5-year IR-free survival was 91% (Confidence interval [CI] 80%-100%) for bilateral ILND group and 88% (CI 73%-100%) for the ipsilateral ILND plus DSNB group (P-value 0.8). Conversely, 5-year CSS was 76% (CI 62%-92%) for bilateral ILND group and 78% (CI 63%-97%) for the ipsilateral ILND plus contralateral DSNB group (P-value 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cN1 peSCC the risk of occult contralateral nodal disease is comparable to cN0 high risk peSCC and the gold standard, namely bilateral ILND, may be replaced by unilateral ILND and contralateral DSNB without affecting positive node detection, IRRs and CSS.

Long term outcome of complex surgical resection and reconstruction for rare thoracic cancers.

BACKGROUND: Complex surgical resection and reconstruction for rare thoracic cancers (RTCs) represent a major challenge, given their very low frequency, extreme variability of presentation, multi-modality treatment options and inadequate outcome prediction. We analysed the experience of a tertiary referral centre on a consecutive series of patients with thoracic germ cell tumours, thymomas and sarcomas, with the aim of reporting the long-term outcome by cancer type and complexity of surgical procedures. METHODS: From Jan 2003 to Dec 2018, 768 surgical procedures were performed with curative intent on 644 RTC patients. Study endpoints were: post-operative hospital stay (Pod), 30-day and 90-day mortality, 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS). Median follow-up of alive patients was 7.2 years. RESULTS: Median Pod was 7 days, with a 1.2% 30-day and 2.9% 90-day mortality. OS was 90.8% at one year, 74.2% at five years and 62.8% at 10 years. Ten-year OS was 73.0% in low, 65.3% in intermediate, and 55.6% in high complexity score (Log-rank tests p<0.0001); 66.6% in patients with one or two reconstructions and 46.4% in patients with three or more reconstructions (p<0.0001); 46.0% with vascular and 50.0% with chest wall reconstruction; 71.8% in germ cell tumours, 64.6% in thymoma and 51.3% in sarcoma (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Complex surgical resection and reconstruction was associated with acceptable 90-day mortality and good 10-year survival in all RTC types. A predictive score based on surgical complexity and cancer type can help the clinical decision making.

Retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (RPLND) as upfront management in stage II germ-cell tumours: Evaluation of safety and efficacy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with stage II germ-cell tumours (GCT) usually undergo radiotherapy (seminoma only) or chemotherapy. Both strategies display a recognised risk of long-term side effects. We evaluated retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as exclusive treatment in stage II GCT. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2019 included, 66 selected stage II GCT patients underwent primary open (O-) or laparoscopic (L-)RPLND. Type of procedure and extent of dissection, operative time, node rescue, hospital stay, complications (according to Clavien-Dindo), administration of chemotherapy, relapse and site of relapse were evaluated. RESULTS: Five patients had pure testicular seminoma. Nineteen (28.8%) had raised markers prior to RPLND; 48 (72.7%), 16 (24.2%) and two (3.0%) were stage IIA, IIB and IIC, respectively. O-RPLND and unilateral L-RPLND were 36 and 30 respectively. Six stage II A patients (12.5%) had negative nodes. Four patients underwent immediate adjuvant chemotherapy. One patient was lost at follow-up. After a median follow-up of 29 months, 48 (77.4%) of the 62 patients undergoing RPLND alone remained recurrence-free; one patient had an in-field recurrence following a bilateral dissection. According to procedure, number of rescued nodes (O-RPLND: 25. IQR 21-31; L-RPLND: 20, IQR 15-26; p: 0.001), hospital stay (L-RPLND: 3 days, IQR 3-4; O-RPLND: 6 days, IQR 5-8; p: .001) and grade ≥2 complications (L-RPLND 7%, O-RPLND 22%; p: 0.1) were the only significant differences. CONCLUSION: Primary RPLND is safe in stage II GCT, including seminoma, and may warrant a cure rate greater than 70%. When feasible, L-RPLND may be as effective as O-RPLND with better tolerability.

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection in metastatic nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors.

OBJECTIVES: To support laparoscopic post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (L-PC-RPLND) as a potential new standard, we report on a large dataset of patients systematically undergoing L-PC-RPLND. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unilateral residual mass (≥1 cm), normalized markers, limited encasement (<30%) of gross retroperitoneal vessels underwent unilateral L-PC-RPLND with no adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgical performances, histology, hospital stay, complications within 30 days and follow-up visits were recorded. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: Between February 2011 and January 2021, 151 consecutive patients underwent L-PC-RPLND. Median size of the residual mass was 25 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 20-35 mm). Overall median operative time was 208 min (IQR 177-241) and was 51 min longer (p-value <0.001) for right L-PC-RPLNDs. Eleven procedures were converted to open surgery. Median number of removed and positive nodes was 11 (IQR 8-16) and 1 (IQR 1-2), respectively. Mean hospital stay was 2 days (IQR 2-3). Nine complications (6%) occurred: two were Clavien-Dindo grade III. Definitive pathology revealed post-pubertal teratoma in 65.6%, fibro-necrotic tissue in 23.8%, teratoma with malignant somatic component in 6.6% and viable tumour in 4.0% patients. In multivariable linear regression models, fibro-necrotic tissue (32 min, CI 8.5-55.5; p < 0.01) and residual volume (1.05 min, CI 0.24-1.85; p < 0.01) achieved independent predictor status for longer operative time. All patients, but one, are alive and disease-free after a median follow-up of 22 months (IQR 10, 48). CONCLUSION: L-PC-RPLND, when adequately planned, is safe and effective for most patients with low to medium volume residual masses.

Renal tumor biopsy in patients with cT1b-T4-M0 disease susceptible to radical nephrectomy: analysis of safety, accuracy and clinical impact on definitive management.

PURPOSE: Renal tumor biopsy was provided in patients candidate to radical nephrectomy for a renal mass ≥4 cm, to evaluate treatment deviation. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2017, 102 patients with a solid renal mass ≥4 cm with no distant metastases underwent preliminary renal tumor biopsy. We investigated the proportion of patients who proceeded with radical nephrectomy, variables predicting non-renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and concordance between biopsy findings and definitive pathology. RESULTS: Median tumor size was 70 mm (IQR 55-110). Clinical stage was cT1b in 41, cT2 in 33, cT3 in 25 and cT4 in three patients. A median of three (IQR 2-3) renal tumor biopsies were taken with 16/18 Gauge needles in 97% of cases. Clavien grade I complications occurred in five cases. Malignant tumors were documented in 84 patients: 78 RCCs and six non-RCCs. Fifteen biopsies documented oncocytoma and three were non-diagnostic. Grade was reported in 50 RCCs: 42 (84%) were low and eight (16%) high grade. Eighty-three patients proceeded with radical nephrectomy; six non-RCC malignant tumors underwent combined and/or intensified treatment; 13 of 15 patients with oncocytoma did not undergo radical nephrectomy (eight underwent observation). Definitive pathology confirmed diagnosis in all cases. Grade concordance was 84%, considering two tiers (high vs low grade). No preoperative clinical variable predicted definitive pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Renal tumor biopsy is a safe procedure that leads to radical nephrectomy in most tumors ≥4 cm. Nonetheless, 20% of patients exhibited non-RCC histology. Renal tumor biopsy should be considered in this setting.

Radiotherapy after testis-sparing surgery for seminoma in monorchid patients: safety and efficacy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate local control and longitudinal endocrine data in monorchid patients treated with testicular-sparing surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for seminomatous germ-cell tumors. METHODS: We searched our database established in 2009 for patients with seminoma who received testis irradiation following partial orchiectomy up to 2018. Eleven patients were identified. All had associated germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) in surrounding parenchyma. Analysis focused on local control and testosterone levels preservation after RT. We considered age, baseline (pre-RT) testosterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, residual testicular volume, tumor size, and testosterone and LH levels trend over time in order to identify any association with endocrine impairment leading to hormonal replacement need. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 21 months, no local or distant relapses were observed and hormonal function was maintained in 54.5% of patients (6/11). No significant interactions were observed for the investigated covariates. Notably, we observed an association between higher baseline testosterone levels and a decreased risk of exogenous androgen replacement (hazard ratio [HR] 0.409, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.161-1.039, p = 0.060), whereas tumor size was associated with an increased risk of exogenous androgen replacement (HR 1.847, 95% CI 0.940-3.627, p = 0.075). CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy after testicular sparing surgery is effective in preventing local disease relapse in presence of GCNIS in the medium term. This strategy allows a preservation of adequate endocrine function in about half of patients. More patients and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.

Risk factors and survival outcomes for upstaging after inguinal lymph node dissection for cN1 penile squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To identify incidence and risk factors for upstaging from cN1 to pN2/N3 at inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) for penile cancer (pSCC). Our secondary objective is to assess survival outcomes and associations for cN1 patients undergoing ILND. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with pT≥1cN1cM0 pSCC who underwent bilateral ILND and had complete data were identified in a multi-institutional international cohort from 8 referral centers in 7 countries diagnosed from 1980 to 2017. Upstaging was defined as pN2/N3 at ILND. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine associations with upstaging, and Cox multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine associations with overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 144 patients were included in the final study population. 84 patients (58%) were upstaged from cN1 to pN2/N3, and 25 (17%) were down staged to pN0. Upstaging was associated with pT3/T4 (OR 4.1, 95%CI 1.5-11.7, P < 0.01) and pTX (OR 7.1, 95CI 1.6-51.1, P = 0.02). Age, smoking status, HPV status, and LVI were not associated with upstaging. Age (HR 1.03/y, 95%CI 1.01-1.06, P < 0.01) and upstaging (HR 2.8, 95%CI 1.3-5.9, P < 0.01) were associated with worse OS. Upstaged patients had a 5-year OS of 49%, compared with 86% for patients who were not upstaged. CONCLUSION: The majority of cN1 pSCC patients harbor a higher-risk disease state than their clinical staging suggests, especially those with higher pT stages. More intensive pre-operative workup may be warranted for these patients to identify upstaging prior to ILND and potentially qualify them for neoadjuvant chemotherapy or clinical trials.

Patterns of Recurrence following Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Penile Cancer: Optimizing Surveillance Strategies.

PURPOSE: Our primary objective is to detail the incidence, site, and timing of penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) recurrence after inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 551 patients who underwent ILND for pSCC from 2000 to 2017. The primary outcome was pSCC recurrence after ILND. Recurrences were identified and stratified by site. Timing of recurrence was determined. Multivariable logistic regression analysis determined associations with recurrence. Multivariable Cox regression analysis determined associations with overall survival (OS). Sub-group analysis of the distant recurrences analyzed timing and OS by site of distant recurrence. RESULTS: After ILND pSCC recurred in 176 (31.9%) patients. Median time to recurrence was 10 months for distant recurrences, 12 for inguinal, 10.5 for pelvic, and 44.5 for local. Greater than 95% of distant, inguinal, and pelvic recurrences occurred within 48 months of ILND, versus 127 months for local recurrences. Post-ILND recurrence was associated with pN2 (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.0-4.1), and pN3 (OR 7.2, 95% CI 4.0-13.7). Patients who had local recurrence had similar OS to those without (HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.6-3.8), and worse OS was identified in patients with inguinal (HR 4.5, 95% CI 2.8-7.1), pelvic (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.5), or distant (HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.7-5.8) recurrences. Patients with lung recurrences had worse OS than other sites (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.3). CONCLUSIONS: Of the patients 31.9% had post-ILND recurrence associated with high pN staging. Greater than 95% of distant, inguinal, and pelvic recurrences occurred within 48 months, suggesting surveillance beyond this is low yield. Local recurrences occurred over a longer timeline, emphasizing necessity of long-term surveillance of the primary site.

Clinical Outcomes in Clinical N0 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis According to Nodal Management: Early, Delayed or Selective (following Dynamic Sentinel Node Biopsy) Inguinal Lymph-Node Dissection.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the oncologic efficacy of early inguinal lymph-node dissection, observation or dynamic sentinel node biopsy followed by delayed or selective inguinal lymph-node dissection in cN0 patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1980 and 2017 (inclusive), 296 evaluable consecutive cN0 penile squamous cell carcinoma patients underwent early inguinal lymph-node dissection (16), observation (114) or dynamic sentinel node biopsy (166). Median followup was 50 months. Tumor stage, grade, lympho-vascular invasion and age were considered. Kaplan-Meier plots illustrated 5-year inguinal relapse-free and cancer specific survival rates. Multivariable Cox regression models tested the treatment effect. Analyses were repeated after inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. RESULTS: The 5-year inguinal relapse-free survival and cancer specific survival rates following early, observation and dynamic sentinel node biopsy inguinal lymph-node dissection were 100%, 87%, 89%, and 84%, 81%, 85%, respectively. The 5-year crude inguinal relapse-free survival and cancer specific survival rates were 90% and 93% in low-risk patients undergoing observation. Clavien grade 3 complications were 0.6 vs 12.5% in the dynamic sentinel node biopsy and early inguinal lymph-node dissection group, respectively. After inverse probability after treatment weighting adjustment, 5-year inguinal relapse and cancer specific survival were 90% vs 73% and 90% vs 77% following dynamic sentinel node biopsy and observation, respectively. At multivariable Cox regression model, patients undergoing dynamic sentinel node biopsy had significantly lower inguinal relapse (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.85, p 0.02) and cancer specific mortality (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.77; p=0.01) compared to those under observation. The low number of patients undergoing early inguinal lymph-node dissection made a reliable comparison with this group impractical. CONCLUSIONS: Selective inguinal lymph-node dissection following dynamic sentinel node biopsy significantly improved inguinal relapse and cancer specific mortality when compared with observation, providing evidence of efficacy of dynamic sentinel node biopsy in clinical stage N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Association Between Human Papillomavirus Infection and Outcome of Perioperative Nodal Radiotherapy for Penile Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Data on the impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection status and outcomes for perioperative treatments for patients with lymph node-involved penile squamous-cell carcinoma (PSCC) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the benefit from perioperative radiotherapy (RT) for PSCC according to HPV infection status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In an international multicenter database of 1254 patients with PSCC who received inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND), 507 had suitable clinical information. INTERVENTION: ILND, with or without chemotherapy or RT for involved lymph nodes. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kaplan-Meier and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analyses for overall survival (OS) were performed for all patients and after propensity score-matching (PSM; n = 136), for which patient age, histology, type of penile surgical procedure, pathological tumor and nodal stage, ILND laterality, pelvic LND, and perioperative treatment were taken into account when assessing differences between HPV+ and HPV- patients. Finally, we looked at genomic alterations in PSCC using data from the Foundation Medicine database (n = 199) to characterize HPV+ PSCC. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Patients with HPV+ PSCC (n = 86; 17%) had lower clinical N stage (p < 0.001) and inguinal lymph node metastasis density (p < 0.001). Perioperative RT was delivered in 49 patients (9.7%), with the vast majority receiving adjuvant RT (n = 40). HPV+ patients had similar median OS (p = 0.1) but longer RMST than HPV- patients at different time points. Nevertheless, HPV+ patients treated with perioperative RT exhibited longer median OS (p = 0.015) and longer RMST compared to HPV- patients. In the PSM cohorts, HPV+ status remained significantly associated with longer OS after RT. The HPV- PSCC group had a higher frequency of TP53 mutations compared to HPV+ PSCC (75% vs 15%; p < 0.001). The results are limited by the retrospective nature of the data. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative RT was more effective in the HPV+ PSCC subgroup. Reasons for the enhanced radiosensitivity may be related to the lack of TP53 mutations. PATIENT SUMMARY: We analyzed data from a large multicenter database for patients with penile cancer who had received inguinal lymph node dissection, with or without chemotherapy or radiotherapy. We found that for tumors positive for human papillomavirus (HPV), use of radiotherapy resulted in prolonged survival compared to HPV-negative tumors. On the basis of these results we are inspired to design studies on the use of radiotherapy in HPV-selected patients.

A risk calculator predicting recurrence in lymph node metastatic penile cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and externally validate a risk calculator for prediction of any cancer recurrence in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) and inguinal lymph node metastases (ILNM), as to date no validated prognostic tool is available for patients with pSCC and ILNM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The development cohort included 234 patients from seven referral centres. The external validation cohort included 273 patients from two additional referral centres. Cox regression identified predictors of any recurrence, which were used to develop a risk calculator. The risk-calculator grouped the development and the validation cohorts according to the individual risk of any recurrence at 24 months (24m-R). Adjuvant treatment effects were tested on overall survival (OS) according to the derived tertiles, within the development and validation cohorts. RESULTS: Positive surgical margins, pN3 , and ILNM ratio were associated with higher recurrence rate. The 2-year OS rates were lower for patients with high (>37%) and intermediate (19-37%) compared to low (<19%) 24m-R risk of recurrence, for both the development (43% and 58% vs 83%, P < 0.001) and validation cohort (44% and 50% vs 85%, P < 0.001). Results were confirmed in the subgroup of patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment (P < 0.001), but not in patients who did receive adjuvant treatments in both the development and validation cohorts (P > 0.1). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant treatment planning is crucial in patients with pSCC with ILNM, where only weak evidence is available. The current tool proved to successfully stratify patients according to their individual risk, potentially allowing better tailoring of adjuvant treatments.

Response of a comprehensive cancer center to the COVID-19 pandemic: the experience of the Fondazione IRCCS-Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano.

BACKGROUND: The rapid spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is affecting many countries. While healthcare systems need to cope with the need to treat a large number of people with different degrees of respiratory failure, actions to preserve aliquots of the healthcare system to guarantee treatment to patients are mandatory. METHODS: In order to protect the Fondazione IRCCS-Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano from the spread of COVID-19, a number of to-hospital and within-hospital filters were applied. Among others, a triage process to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positivity in patients with cancer was developed consisting of high-resolution low-dose computed tomography (CT) scan followed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nose-throat swabs whenever CT was suggestive of lung infection. To serve symptomatic patients who were already admitted to the hospital or in need of hospitalization while waiting for RT-PCR laboratory confirmation of infection, a COVID-19 surveillance zone was set up. RESULTS: A total of 301 patients were screened between March 6 and April 3, 2020. Of these, 47 were hospitalized, 53 needed a differential diagnosis to continue with their cancer treatment, and 201 were about to undergo surgery. RT-PCR was positive in 13 of 40 hospitalized patients (32%), 14 of 52 day hospital patients (27%), and 6 of 201 surgical patients (3%). CONCLUSION: Applying filters to protect our comprehensive cancer center from COVID-19 spread contributed to guaranteeing cancer care during the COVID-19 crisis in Milan. A surveillance area and surgical triage allowed us to protect the hospital from as many as 33 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Identifying an optimal lymph node yield for penile squamous cell carcinoma: prognostic impact of surgical dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic impact of lymph node yield (LNY) on survival outcomes for penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 532 patients who underwent inguinal LN dissection (ILND) across tertiary referral centres from Europe, China, Brazil and North America were retrospectively evaluated. From this cohort, 198 patients received pelvic LND (PLND).We identified threshold values for ILND and PLND using receiver operating characteristic curves. We tested prognostic value of LNY for recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meir method and Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: The median (interquartile [IQR]) age was 59 (49-68) years and the median (IQR) follow-up after ILND was 28 (12-68.2) months. Overall, 85% of the patients had bilateral dissections. The median (IQR) number of inguinal LNs removed was 15 (10-22). Of those receiving PLND, The median (IQR) number of LNs was 13 (8-19). A LNY of ≥15 was used for dichotomisation of ILND patients, and a LNY of ≥9 was used in the PLND cohort. Patients with a LNY ≥15 had significantly better 5-year OS vs patients with a LNY <15 (70.1% vs 58.7%). On multivariable analyses, a LNY ≥15 was a predictor of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, P = 0.029). For cN0 patients, a LNY ≥15 was an independent predictor of RFS (HR 0.52, P = 0.043) and OS (HR 0.53, P = 0.021). In the PLND cohort, a LNY ≥9 was a predictor of RFS (HR 0.53, P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Using one of the largest LND datasets to date, we found LNY to be a significant predictor of outcomes after lymphatic staging for penile SCC. Prospective validation is warranted.

Nomogram-based prediction of overall survival after regional lymph node dissection and the role of perioperative chemotherapy in penile squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: To improve the prognostic allocation of patients with penile squamous-cell carcinoma (PSCC) receiving regional lymph node dissection (LND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: An international, multicenter, retrospective study was performed on patients with PSCC who received regional LND, with or without perioperative therapy, from 1980 to 2017. We first used a random forest (RF) method with missing data imputation. Additionally, data were modeled using Cox proportional hazard regression, and a Cox model was also fit including prespecified variables. Based on the latter model, a nomogram for estimating 12-month and 24-month overall survival (OS) was developed. RESULTS: There were 743 patients who received LND at 7 referral centers from Europe, the USA, Brazil, and China. Of these patients, 689 were analyzed: 86 (12.5%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC); 171 (24.8%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and 74 (10.7%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. The variables significantly associated with OS were age (P < 0.001), the pathologically involved/total removed LN ratio (P < 0.001), pN stage (overall P < 0.001), and NAC (P = 0.013). NAC and AC were ineffective in N1-2 patients (clinical and pathological, respectively), whereas they provided OS improvements in N3 patients. Finally, we developed a nomogram predicting 12- and 24-month OS based on prespecified variables (c-index: 0.75). The study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a tool that can be offered as an aid to physicians to enhance decision-making, clinical research, and patient counseling whenever LND is needed for PSCC. Administration of NAC and AC should be restricted to clinical and pathological N3 patients, respectively.

Recommendations for surveillance and follow-up of men with testicular germ cell tumors: a multidisciplinary consensus conference by the Italian Germ cell cancer Group and the Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica.

BACKGROUND: No compelling evidence is available about surveillance and follow-up of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT). METHODS: In the light of the best clinical evidence, the Italian Germ cell cancer Group (IGG) and the Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica (AIOM) set up a multidisciplinary national consensus conference, involving 42 leading experts and 3 TGCT survivors. A minimum of 50% of votes was required in order to achieve a consensus recommendation on 29 questions. RESULTS: Recommendations have been summarized in three tables, divided by stage I seminoma, stage I nonseminoma and the advanced disease, which may be useful for clinicians to appropriately choose the clinical investigation and its timing during the surveillance and follow-up of TGCT patients based on an accurate estimation of their risk of disease relapse. CONCLUSIONS: The IGG-AIOM consensus recommendations may help clinicians to choose appropriate clinical investigations for the surveillance and follow-up of TGCT patients.