Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 22(2): 633-640, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29344805

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature assessing potential salivary biomarkers of oral cancer and pre-cancer and discuss emerging issues and challenges in relation to oral cancer and pre-cancer diagnostics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Search for articles involved the Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE. Specific terms were used from January 1995 to March 2017 by three experts. RESULTS: This search collected 270 articles, of which 105 articles such as reviews, case reports, news, letter to editor, etc. in first round and 117 articles such as publications in other languages than English, non-human studies, etc. were excluded. The remaining 48 articles considered analyzing whole saliva as well as specific gland saliva. Thirty-one studies considered oral stimuli such as eating, drinking, and oral hygiene practices for varied periods of time prior to sample collection. The time of collection of saliva was morning in most studies, but the exact time of collection was not mentioned. Three studies showed to have evaluated the whole saliva without centrifugation. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and tandem mass spectrometry were the most commonly used methods. Most of the potential salivary biomarkers of oral cancer are salivary proteins. CONCLUSION: Combination approach of salivary biomarkers could be used as screening tool to improve early detection and diagnostic precision of oral pre-cancer and cancer. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The current findings are of importance for clinicians and researchers to mitigate the challenges in salivary-based diagnosis of oral cancer and to evaluate reliable, specific, and sensitive salivary biomarkers for oral pre-cancer and cancer diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Early Detection of Cancer , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mouth Neoplasms/metabolism , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/metabolism , Saliva/chemistry , Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional , Humans , Tandem Mass Spectrometry
2.
B-ENT ; 11(2): 101-8, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26563009

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study compared a quantum molecular resonance tonsillectomy (QMRT) to a standard blunt dissection tonsillectomy (BDT) for effectiveness and safety. METHODOLOGY: From January 2011 to September 2012, we recruited 80 children (ages 3 to 16 y) with paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and/or recurrent tonsillitis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive QMRT (N = 40) or BDT (N = 40). The operating time and blood loss during surgery were evaluated. During the first postoperative week, the patients' parents completed a questionnaire to evaluate bleeding, ear and neck pain, nausea, vomiting, interrupted sleep, oral liquid intake or discomfort in fluid assumption, and analgesic consumption. RESULTS: The average tonsillectomy duration was significantly shorter in the QMRT group (22.07 min ± 9.05) than in the BDT group (35.12 min ± 13.32; p < 0.000005). The average blood loss during tonsillectomy was significantly lower for the QMRT group (5.62 ml ± 7.44) than for the BDT group (43 ml ± 33.20; p < 000000001). However, the BDT group reported significantly lower pain scores than the QMRT group on days 2 (p < 0.05), 5 (p < 0.05), and 6 (p < 0.05); on other days, the groups were not significantly different. The BDT group reported two early and one late bleeding episodes; the QMRT group recorded only two late bleeding episodes. CONCLUSIONS: QMRT significantly reduced the operating time and intra-operative blood loss. No significant differences were found between the two techniques in postoperative pain or bleeding.


Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical , Electrocoagulation/methods , Pain, Postoperative , Postoperative Hemorrhage , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/surgery , Tonsillectomy/methods , Tonsillitis/surgery , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Dissection/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Operative Time , Recurrence , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome
3.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 24(2): 139-48, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21652191

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with advanced cancer has been reported to be on average 25% and to significantly affect patients' quality of life. Despite high prevalence rates, these disorders remain underdiagnosed and undertreated. The purpose of our study was to examine the self-report rates of anxiety and depression with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and to assess the predictive factors for these reports in cancer patients with metastatic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who attended the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (RRRP) completed the ESAS as well as baseline demographic information. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors that significantly predicted anxiety and/or depression. Pearson χ(2) was used to test goodness-of-fit for categorical variables and established whether or not an observed frequency distribution differed from a predicted frequency distribution. A univariate analysis was conducted first and those variables with a P value<0.100 were included in a multivariate analysis. A score test was used to test the proportional odds assumption. RESULTS: In total, 1439 patients seen in the RRRP between January 1999 and October 2009 completed ESAS questionnaires. Fifty-five per cent of patients reported at least mild symptoms of depression and 65% reported at least mild anxiety. In the univariate analysis, patients who were female, who had a lower performance status score, or primary lung cancer were more likely to report depressed and anxious feelings. Primary prostate cancer patients were significantly less likely to report depression and anxiety. Patients referred for spinal cord compression were significantly less depressed. The multivariate models showed that younger patients were significantly more anxious than older patients and females reported more anxiety than males. Patients who reported higher feelings of nausea, tiredness, drowsiness, dyspnoea, and worse appetite and overall well-being on the ESAS tool were more likely to report feelings of depression. Patients who reported higher nausea, drowsiness, dyspnoea and worse overall well-being more often reported higher feelings of anxiety. CONCLUSION: The self-report rates of anxiety and depression were consistent with published prevalence rates. However, the explained variance based on factors included in the model remains low. Additional predictive factors should be examined in future studies in this population. The ESAS tool seems to be an efficient screening tool for anxiety and depression; however, future studies should examine its correlative properties with other known screening tools in the advanced cancer population. A prospective study should be conducted to assess the severity cut-off point in which the ESAS scores most frequently lead to a further diagnosis of an anxiety or depressive disorder in the advance cancer population.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/psychology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young Adult
4.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 24(2): 112-24, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22130630

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To update previous meta-analyses of randomised palliative radiotherapy trials comparing single fractions versus multiple fractions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All published randomised controlled trials comparing single fraction versus multiple fraction schedules for the palliation of uncomplicated bone metastases were included in this analysis. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each trial. Forest plots were created using a random effects model and the Mantel-Haenszel statistic. RESULTS: In total, 25 randomised controlled trials were identified. For intention-to-treat patients, the overall response rate was similar in patients receiving single fractions (1696 of 2818; 60%) and multiple fractions (1711 of 2799; 61%). Complete response rates were 620 of 2641 (23%) in the single fraction arm and 634 of 2622 (24%) in the multiple fraction arm. No significant difference was seen in overall or complete response rates. Pathological fracture did not favour either arm, but spinal cord compression trended towards favouring multiple fractions; however, neither was statistically significant (P = 0.72 and P = 0.13, respectively). Retreatment rates favoured patients in the multiple fraction arm, where the likelihood of requiring re-irradiation was 2.6-fold greater in the single fraction arm (95% confidence interval: 1.92-3.47; P < 0.00001). Repeated analyses excluding drop-out patients did not alter these findings. In general, no significant differences in acute toxicities were seen. CONCLUSION: Overall and complete response rates were similar in both intention-to-treat and assessable patients. Single and multiple fraction regimens provided equal pain relief; however, significantly higher retreatment rates occurred in those receiving single fractions.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Palliative Care/methods , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
5.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 97(3): 276-86, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21489898

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Osteotomy of the anterior tibial tubercle (TT) is well known as the approach to difficult knees, in particular those with a low patella, but it has a poor reputation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This technique was used 21 times in 20 patients (10 males and 10 females) with a mean age of 71 years (range, 42-90 years) for 14 prosthesis revisions (three for septic loosening, 11 for aseptic loosening) and seven knees that had not anteriorly received prior implants (three osteotomies, one synovectomy). The surgical technique included a long (7 cm), thick (>1 cm) fragment retaining its lateral muscle hinge with compression fixation using two screws. In cases with a low patella, the TT was proximally displaced, with amplitude limited by the tibial baseplate. Follow-up was clinical and radiological, lasting a mean 54 months (range, 8-195 months). The clinical results were assessed using the IKS score and the radiological results using the measurement of the patellar index according to the protocol described during the Lyon Knee Days. RESULTS: The mean preoperative IKS scores were: knee, 57.5±22.4; function, 42.6±21.5 (total, 100±33.9); postoperative scores: knee, 84±11.6; function 65±28 (total, 149±32.9). The joint range of motion increased from 73±34.9 to 88±21.1 for a mean gain of 15±23.1. We found a traumatic nondisplaced tibia fracture around a tibial stem, treated conservatively, two stress fractures of the immediate proximal part overhanging the TT with no consequences, one case of stiffness (not related to the osteotomy), and one case of localized skin necrosis on a knee that had undergone several surgeries (secondary scarring). No cases of malunion or migration of the TT were noted. The mean deliberate proximal migration obtained was 13 mm±6 (range, 8-33 mm). The patellar index increased from 0.18±0.20 (range, -0.39 to 0.57) to 0.33±0.19 (range, -0.13 to 0.60). DISCUSSION: This series shows that the indications are rare but invaluable, facilitating the approach and most particularly making it possible to modify the position of the patella, thus contributing to increasing the joint range of motion. Fixation with two screws carries no risk of disassembly if the technique is rigorous. Patellar translation is limited by the tibial tray.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Osteotomy/methods , Reoperation/methods , Tibia/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Prosthesis Failure , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome
6.
Curr Oncol ; 17(4): 42-7, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20697513

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: With the widespread use of sequential anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, clinicians are becoming rapidly aware of toxicities associated with those regimens. Despite the low incidence reported in the literature of significant arthralgia and myalgia with those regimens, it is clinically evident that a substantial proportion of patients develop such toxicities. We performed a pilot study to investigate the extent of this problem. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy [doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (AC-T), doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (AC-D), or 5-fluourouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (FEC-D)] completed a retrospective outcomes-based survey. The survey utilized the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane Scale, the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, and a modified Brief Pain Inventory. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 82 patients. Interviewees had received AC-T (43%), FEC-D (43%), and AC-D (14%). Pain as a side effect of either the anthracycline or the taxane chemotherapy was reported by 87% of patients. Most of the patients (79%) indicated that their worst pain occurred during the taxane component of treatment. Compared with paclitaxel, docetaxel was reported to cause more pain. Narcotics for pain management were required by 35 of 82 patients (43%). CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of patients receiving sequential anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer experience pain, particularly during the taxane component. Prospective patient-reported outcome assessments are needed to help individualize treatment interventions and to improve symptom management in this population.

7.
Curr Oncol ; 17(4): 94-112, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20697521

ABSTRACT

Radiation therapy is a common treatment for cancer patients. One of the most common side effects of radiation is acute skin reaction (radiation dermatitis) that ranges from a mild rash to severe ulceration. Approximately 85% of patients treated with radiation therapy will experience a moderate-to-severe skin reaction. Acute radiation-induced skin reactions often lead to itching and pain, delays in treatment, and diminished aesthetic appearance-and subsequently to a decrease in quality of life. Surveys have demonstrated that a wide variety of topical, oral, and intravenous agents are used to prevent or to treat radiation-induced skin reactions. We conducted a literature review to identify trials that investigated products for the prophylaxis and management of acute radiation dermatitis. Thirty-nine studies met the pre-defined criteria, with thirty-three being categorized as prophylactic trials and six as management trials.For objective evaluation of skin reactions, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria and the U.S. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria were the most commonly used tools (65% of the studies). Topical corticosteroid agents were found to significantly reduce the severity of skin reactions; however, the trials of corticosteroids evaluated various agents, and no clear indication about a preferred corticosteroid has emerged. Amifostine and oral enzymes were somewhat effective in preventing radiation-induced skin reactions in phase II and phase III trials respectively; further large randomized controlled trials should be undertaken to better investigate those products. Biafine cream (Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, NJ, U.S.A.) was found not to be superior to standard regimes in the prevention of radiation-induced skin reactions (n = 6).In conclusion, the evidence is insufficient to support the use of a particular agent for the prevention and management of acute radiation-induced skin reactions. Future trials should focus on comparing agents and approaches that, in phase I and II trials, suggest efficacy. These future phase III randomized controlled trials must clearly distinguish between preventive and management strategies for radiation-induced dermatitis. Only then can evidence-based guidelines be developed, with the hope of standardizing the approach across centres and of improving the prevention and management of radiation-induced dermatitis.

8.
Curr Oncol ; 16(2): 16-28, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19370175

ABSTRACT

Approximately 27% of North American cancer deaths are attributable to cancer of the lung. Many lung cancers are found at an advanced stage, rendering the tumours inoperable and the patients palliative. Common symptoms associated with palliative lung cancer include cough, hemoptysis, and dyspnea, all of which can significantly debilitate and diminish quality of life (QOL). In studies of the effects of cancer therapies, the frequent evaluative endpoints are survival and local control; however, it is imperative that clinical trials with palliative patients also have a QOL focus when a cure is unattainable. We conducted a literature review to investigate the use of QOL instrument tools in trials studying QOL or symptom palliation of primary lung cancer or lung metastases through the use of radiotherapy. We identified forty-three studies: nineteen used a QOL tool, and twenty-four examined symptom palliation without the use of a QOL instrument. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (eortc) QLQ-C30 survey was the most commonly used QOL questionnaire (in thirteen of twenty trials). Of those thirteen studies, eight also incorporated the lung-specific QOL survey eortc QLQ-LC13 (or the eortc QLQ-LC17). A second lung-specific survey, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (fact-L) was used in only two of the twenty trials. In total, only ten of forty-three trials (23%) used a lung-specific QOL tool, suggesting that QOL was of low priority as an endpoint and that measures created for lung cancer patients are underused. We encourage investigators in future trials to include specific QOL instruments such as the eortc QLQ-LC13 or the fact-L for studies in palliative thoracic radiotherapy because those instruments provide a measure of QOL specific to patients with lung cancer or lung metastases.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...