Bortezomib before and after high-dose therapy in myeloma: long-term results from the phase III HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial.

The Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial Group for Hematology Oncology Group-65/German-speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group-HD4 (HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4) phase III trial compared bortezomib (BTZ) before and after high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM, PAD arm) compared with classical cytotoxic agents prior and thalidomide after HDM (VAD arm) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients aged 18-65 years. Here, the long-term follow-up and data on second primary malignancies (SPM) are presented. After a median follow-up of 96 months, progression-free survival (censored at allogeneic transplantation, PFS) remained significantly prolonged in the PAD versus VAD arm (hazard ratio (HR)=0.76, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 0.65-0.89, P=0.001). Overall survival (OS) was similar in the PAD versus VAD arm (HR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.74-1.08, P=0.24). The incidence of SPM were similar between the two arms (7% each, P=0.73). The negative prognostic effects of the cytogenetic aberration deletion 17p13 (clone size ⩾10%) and renal impairment at baseline (serum creatinine >2 mg dl-1) on PFS and OS remained abrogated in the PAD but not VAD arm. OS from first relapse/progression was similar between the study arms (HR=1.02, P=0.85). In conclusion, the survival benefit with BTZ induction/maintenance compared with classical cytotoxic agents and thalidomide maintenance is maintained without an increased risk of SPM.

Condensed versus standard schedule of high-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy with pegfilgrastim growth factor support in acute myeloid leukemia.

The aim of this cohort study was to compare a condensed schedule of consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine on days 1, 2 and 3 (HDAC-123) with the HDAC schedule given on days 1, 3 and 5 (HDAC-135) as well as to evaluate the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission. One hundred and seventy-six patients were treated with HDAC-135 and 392 patients with HDAC-123 with prophylactic pegfilgrastim at days 10 and 8, respectively, in the AMLSG 07-04 and the German AML Intergroup protocol. Time from start to chemotherapy until hematologic recovery with white blood cells >1.0 G/l and neutrophils >0.5 G/l was in median 4 days shorter in patients receiving HDAC-123 compared with HDAC-135 (P<0.0001, each), and further reduced by 2 days (P<0.0001) by pegfilgrastim. Rates of infections were reduced by HDAC-123 (P<0.0001) and pegfilgrastim (P=0.002). Days in hospital and platelet transfusions were significantly reduced by HDAC-123 compared with HDAC-135. Survival was neither affected by HDAC-123 versus HDAC-135 nor by pegfilgrastim. In conclusion, consolidation therapy with HDAC-123 leads to faster hematologic recovery and less infections, platelet transfusions as well as days in hospital without affecting survival.

Impact of salvage regimens on response and overall survival in acute myeloid leukemia with induction failure.

We evaluated the impact of salvage regimens and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with induction failure. Between 1993 and 2009, 3324 patients with newly diagnosed AML were enrolled in 5 prospective treatment trials of the German-Austrian AML Study Group. After first induction therapy with idarubicin, cytarabine and etoposide (ICE), 845 patients had refractory disease. In addition, 180 patients, although responding to first induction, relapsed after second induction therapy. Of the 1025 patients with induction failure, 875 (median age 55 years) received intensive salvage therapy: 7+3-based (n=59), high-dose cytarabine combined with mitoxantrone (HAM; n=150), with all-trans retinoic acid (A; A-HAM) (n=247), with gemtuzumab ozogamicin and A (GO; GO-A-HAM) (n=140), other intensive regimens (n=165), experimental treatment (n=27) and direct allo-HCT (n=87). In patients receiving intensive salvage chemotherapy (n=761), response (complete remission/complete remission with incomplete hematological recovery (CR/CRi)) was associated with GO-A-HAM treatment (odds ratio (OR), 1.93; P=0.002), high-risk cytogenetics (OR, 0.62; P=0.006) and age (OR for a 10-year difference, 0.75; P<0.0001). Better survival probabilities were seen in an extended Cox regression model with time-dependent covariables in patients responding to salvage therapy (P<0.0001) and having the possibility to perform an allo-HCT (P<0.0001). FLT3 internal tandem duplication, mutated IDH1 and adverse cytogenetics were unfavorable factors for survival.

Phase III trial of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) versus bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (PAd) in newly diagnosed myeloma.

We aimed at demonstrating non-inferiority of bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone (VCD) compared to bortezomib/doxorubicin/dexamethasone (PAd) induction therapy with respect to very good partial response rates or better (⩾VGPR) in 504 newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients. VCD was found to be non-inferior to PAd with respect to ⩾VGPR rates (37.0 versus 34.3%, P=0.001). The rates of progressive disease (PD) were 0.4% (VCD) versus 4.8% (PAd; P=0.003). In the PAd arm, 11 of 12 patients with PD had either renal impairment (creatinine ⩾2 mg/dl) at diagnosis or the cytogenetic abnormality gain 1q21, whereas no PD was observed in these subgroups in the VCD arm. Leukocytopenia/neutropenia (⩾3°) occurred more frequently in the VCD arm (35.2% versus 11.3%, P<0.001). Neuropathy rates (⩾2°) were higher in the PAd group (14.9 versus 8.4%, P=0.03). Serious adverse events, both overall and those related to thromboembolic events, were higher in the PAd group (32.7 versus 24.0%, P=0.04 and 2.8 versus 0.4%, P=0.04). Stem cell collection was not impeded by VCD. VCD is as effective as PAd in terms of achieving ⩾VGPR rates with fewer PD and has a favorable toxicity profile. Therefore, VCD is preferable to PAd as induction therapy.

Diagnosis and antimicrobial therapy of lung infiltrates in febrile neutropenic patients (allogeneic SCT excluded): updated guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO).

Up to 25% of patients with profound neutropenia lasting for >10 days develop lung infiltrates, which frequently do not respond to broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy. While a causative pathogen remains undetected in the majority of cases, Aspergillus spp., Pneumocystis jirovecii, multi-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, mycobacteria or respiratory viruses may be involved. In at-risk patients who have received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) prophylaxis, filamentous fungal pathogens appear to be predominant, yet commonly not proven at the time of treatment initiation. Pathogens isolated from blood cultures, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or respiratory secretions are not always relevant for the etiology of pulmonary infiltrates and should therefore be interpreted critically. Laboratory tests for detecting Aspergillus galactomannan, ß-D-glucan or DNA from blood, BAL or tissue samples may facilitate the diagnosis; however, most polymerase chain reaction assays are not yet standardized and validated. Apart from infectious agents, pulmonary side-effects from cytotoxic drugs, radiotherapy or pulmonary involvement by the underlying malignancy should be included into differential diagnosis and eventually be clarified by invasive diagnostic procedures. Pre-emptive treatment with mold-active systemic antifungal agents improves clinical outcome, while other microorganisms are preferably treated only when microbiologically documented. High-dose TMP/SMX is first choice for treatment of Pneumocystis pneumonia, while cytomegalovirus pneumonia is treated primarily with ganciclovir or foscarnet in most patients. In a considerable number of patients, clinical outcome may be favorable despite respiratory failure, so that intensive care should be unrestrictedly provided in patients whose prognosis is not desperate due to other reasons.

Central venous catheter-related infections in hematology and oncology: 2012 updated guidelines on diagnosis, management and prevention by the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are at increased risk for central venous catheter-related infections (CRIs). Thus, a comprehensive, practical and evidence-based guideline on CRI in patients with malignancies is warranted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A panel of experts by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) has developed a guideline on CRI in cancer patients. Literature searches of the PubMed, Medline and Cochrane databases were carried out and consensus discussions were held. RESULTS: Recommendations on diagnosis, management and prevention of CRI in cancer patients are made, and the strength of the recommendation and the level of evidence are presented. CONCLUSION: This guideline is an evidence-based approach to the diagnosis, management and prevention of CRI in cancer patients.

Plerixafor with and without chemotherapy in poor mobilizers: results from the German compassionate use program.

The CXCR4-inhibitor plerixafor mobilizes hematopoietic stem cells amplifying the effects of granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF). Before approval plerixafor was used in a compassionate use program (CUP) for patients who failed a previous mobilization. In the German CUP 60 patients from 23 centers (median age 56.5 years (2-75)) were given 240 µg/kg plerixafor SC 9-11 h before apheresis. A total of 78.3% (47/60) received G-CSF for 4 days before plerixafor administration; 76.6% of those (36/47) yielded at least 2.0 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/µL. The median cell yield was 3.35 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (0-29.53). Nine patients received plerixafor alone or with G-CSF for less than 4 days mobilizing a median of 3.30 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (1.6-5.6). There was no significant difference between G-CSF application for 4 days and for a shorter period of time (P=0.157). A total of 47 patients received plerixafor plus G-CSF combined with chemotherapy yielding a median of 3.28 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (0-24.79). In all, 40 of 60 patients (66.7%) proceeded to transplantation, and achieved a timely and stable engraftment. Side effects were rare and manageable. In conclusion, mobilization with plerixafor in poor mobilizers is safe and results in a sufficient stem cell harvest in the majority of patients.

Management of sepsis in neutropenic patients: guidelines from the infectious diseases working party of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology.

Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality in neutropenic cancer patients. Early initiation of effective causative therapy as well as intensive adjunctive therapy is mandatory to improve outcome. We give recommendations for the management of adults with neutropenia and sepsis. The guidelines are written for clinicians involved in care of cancer patients and focus on pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of sepsis during neutropenia.

Thalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: influence of thalidomide treatment on peripheral blood stem cell collection yield.

In a phase III randomized, multicenter study, the German-speaking Myeloma-Multicenter Group (GMMG) and the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON) group investigated the influence of thalidomide (Thal) on the outcome of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in multiple myeloma (MM) before peripheral autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). We analyzed the data of 398 myeloma patients after induction with Thal, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (TAD) in comparison with vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) followed by mobilization with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (CAD) and PBSC collection. Within both the study groups, patients treated with TAD showed to collect significantly fewer CD34(+) cells compared with VAD (GMMG, TAD: median 9.8 x 10(6)/kg; range 2.0-33.6; VAD: median 10.9 x 10(6)/kg range 3.0-36.0; P=0.02) (HOVON, TAD: median 7.4 x 10(6)/kg; range 2.0-33.0; VAD: median 9.4 x 10(6)/kg; range 0.0-48.7; P=0.009). However, engraftment after peripheral autologous stem cell transplantation showed no difference between Thal and VAD groups. We conclude that Thal as a part of induction regimen is associated with better response rates (GMMG-HD3: CR/PR 79%, VAD: CR/PR 58%; HOVON-50: TAD: CR/PR 81%, VAD: CR/PR 61%), but significantly affects the yield of PBSC collection. Nevertheless, the number of total CD34(+) cells collected was sufficient for double autologous transplantation in 82% of the Thal patients, with at least 2.5 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells.

High-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone in consolidation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia.

The objective of our study was to evaluate high-dose cytarabine in consolidation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Patients (age 16-60 years) received induction therapy according to the AIDA protocol (all-trans retinoic acid, idarubicin) followed by one cycle of ICE (idarubicin, cytarabine, etoposide) and two cycles of HAM (cytarabine 3 g/m(2) q12h, days 1-3; mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2), days 2 and 3). From 1995 to 2003, 82 patients were enrolled. In total, 72 patients (88%) achieved a complete remission, and 10 patients (12%) died from early/hypoplastic death (ED/HD). A total of 71 patients received at least one cycle of HAM. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after 46 months were 83 and 82%, respectively. White blood cell count above 10.0 x 10(9)/l at diagnosis and additional chromosomal aberrations were unfavorable prognostic markers for OS, whereas no prognostic markers for RFS were identified including FLT3 mutations. In conclusion, high-dose cytarabine in consolidation therapy for patients with newly diagnosed APL is an effective treatment approach.

Phase III study of all-trans retinoic acid in previously untreated patients 61 years or older with acute myeloid leukemia.

The purpose of our study was (i) to evaluate the impact of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) given as adjunct to chemotherapy and (ii) to compare second consolidation vs maintenance therapy in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A total of 242 patients aged >or=61 years (median, 66.6 years) with AML were randomly assigned to ATRA beginning on day +3 after the initiation of chemotherapy (ATRA-arm, n=122) or no ATRA (standard-arm, n=120) in combination with induction and first consolidation therapy. A total of 61 patients in complete remission (CR) were randomly assigned to second intense consolidation (n=31) or 1-year oral maintenance therapy (n=30). After induction therapy the intention-to-treat analysis revealed a significant difference in CR rates between the ATRA- and the standard-arm (52 vs 39%; P=0.05). Event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the ATRA-compared to the standard-arm (P=0.03 and 0.01, respectively). OS after second randomization was significantly better for patients assigned to intensive consolidation therapy (P<0.001). The multivariate model for survival revealed lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetic risk group, age, and first and second randomization as prognostic variables. In conclusion, the addition of ATRA to induction and consolidation therapy may improve CR rate, EFS and OS in elderly patients with AML.

Outpatient treatment of multiple myeloma with a combination of vincristine, Adriamycin and dexamethasone.

Patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) have been shown to respond to a combination therapy consisting of vincristine, Adriamycin (doxorubicin) and high-dose dexamethasone (VAD). Because of the low hematological toxicity of the VAD regimen, this combination is frequently chosen for tumor reduction prior to high-dose therapy and blood stem cell transplantation. This study was designed to examine the efficacy and complications of outpatient VAD treatment. Over a period of 6 years, 103 outpatients with MM were treated with VAD chemotherapy administered by microprocessor-controlled infusion pumps via intravenous polyurethane catheters equipped with a safety valve. Response to treatment, treatment-associated complications and infections were documented and analyzed. In 85 of the 103 patients, tumor reduction by more than 25% was found. In 8 patients an occlusion occurred as a result of kinking of the central venous catheter in the subcutaneous segment. In two treatment cycles the infusions had to be stopped because of irreversible catheter occlusion. Twenty patients were hospitalized because of complications, which were infectious in 12 and noninfectious in 8. Severe infectious complications (> or =WHO grade III) occurred in 5.6% of the treatment cycles. Thus, continuous infusion of VAD over 96 h can be performed on an outpatient basis with a low complication rate.

Efficacy of continuous infusion of ceftazidime for patients with neutropenic fever after high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

Neutropenia is an important complication of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT). Neutropenic patients presenting with fever are routinely hospitalized for treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Neutropenia up to 10 days is associated with a low-risk profile, and antimicrobial therapy administered on an outpatient basis might be an alternative to admission to hospital. This prospective study evaluates the safety of a continuous infusion of ceftazidime in neutropenic patients after HDCT and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). From September 1995 to October 1999, 81 patients received a 2 g intravenous bolus of ceftazidime, followed by a 4 g continuous infusion per 24 h of ceftazidime using a portable infusion pump. If the fever persisted for 72 h, a glycopeptide antibiotic was added. The median patients' age was 44 years. Fifty-two of 81 patients (64%) responded to the monotherapy with ceftazidime. After addition of a glycopeptide antibiotic, a further 17 patients (21%) became afebrile. The causes of fever were septicaemia in 11 patients, pneumonia in two and fever of unknown origin in 68 patients. Fifty-eight episodes (72%) were successfully managed by outpatient treatment alone. The reason for admission to hospital was the change to imipenem/cilastin, which had to be administered three times per day (12 patients), severe mucositis with parenteral nutrition (eight patients), or a Karnovsky index