Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Nervenarzt ; 88(8): 905-910, 2017 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28289791

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: After weaning failure, patients who are transferred from intensive care units to early rehabilitation centers (ERC) not only suffer from motor deficits but also from cognitive deficits. It is still uncertain which patient factors have an impact on cognitive outcome at the end of early rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: Investigation of predictors of cognitive performance for initially ventilated early rehabilitation patients. METHODS: A total of 301 patients (mean age 68.3 ± 11.4 years, 67% male) were consecutively enrolled in an ERC for a prospective observational study between January 2014 and December 2015. To investigate influencing factors on cognitive outcome operationalized by the neuromental index (NMI), we collected sociodemographic data, parameters about the critical illness, comorbidities, weaning and decannulation as well as different functional scores at admission and discharge and carried out multivariate analyses by ANCOVA. RESULTS: Of the patients 248 (82%) were successfully weaned, 155 (52%) decannulated and 75 patients (25%) died of whom 39 (13%) were under palliative treatment. For the survivors (n = 226) we could identify independent predictors of the NMI at discharge from the ERC in the final sex and age-adjusted statistical model: alertness and decannulation were positively associated with the NMI whereas hypoxia, cerebral infarction and traumatic brain injury had a negative impact on cognitive ability. The model justifies 57% of the variance of the NMI (R2 = 0.568) and therefore has a high quality of explanation. CONCLUSION: Because of increased risk of cognitive deficits at discharge of ERC, all patients who suffered from hypoxia, cerebral infarction or traumatic brain injury should be intensively treated by neuropsychologists. Since decannulation is also associated with positive cognitive outcome, a rapid decannulation procedure should also be an important therapeutic target, especially in alert patients.


Subject(s)
Brain Damage, Chronic/rehabilitation , Cognition Disorders/rehabilitation , Early Medical Intervention , Intensive Care Units , Ventilator Weaning , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain Damage, Chronic/diagnosis , Brain Damage, Chronic/mortality , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/mortality , Female , Germany , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Mental Status Schedule , Middle Aged , Neurologic Examination , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Tracheotomy
2.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg) ; 56(3): 181-188, 2017 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28231595

ABSTRACT

This study investigated subjective biopsychosocial effects of coronary heart disease (CHD), coping strategies and social support in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and having extensive work-related problems. A qualitative investigation was performed in 17 patients (48.9±7.0 y, 13 male) with extensive work-related problems (SIMBO-C>30). All patients were interviewed with structured surveys. Data analysis was performed using a software that is based on the content analysis approach of Mayring. In regard to effects of disease, patients indicated social aspects including occupational aspects (62%) more often than physical or mental factors (9 or 29%). Applied coping strategies and support services are mainly focused on physical impairments (70 or 45%). The development of appropriate coping strategies was insufficient although social effects of disease were subjectively meaningful for patients in CR.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Rehabilitation/psychology , Coronary Artery Disease/psychology , Coronary Artery Disease/rehabilitation , Return to Work/psychology , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Social Adjustment , Social Support , Adaptation, Psychological , Cardiac Rehabilitation/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Quality of Life/psychology , Return to Work/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors
3.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg) ; 55(1): 34-9, 2016 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26882136

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There are hardly any publications about the outcome of cardiac rehabilitation considering patients with an increased need for medical, nursing and therapeutic care. The aim of this study, which consecutively included n=387 statutory health insurance inpatients over a period of 2 years, was to find out differences in outcome in self-care patients (Barthel index>70) as compared to patients with a need for complex care (Barthel index≤70). METHODS: Rehabilitation outcomes concerning physical capacity, emotional status and activities of daily living as measured by Barthel index, FIM index, HADS, clinical complications, exercise test, duration of rehabilitation and form of dismission were analyzed and compared between both groups. RESULTS: The inpatients with a Barthel index ≤70 at admission were older, had a longer stay in hospital and in rehabilitation, developed more complications and more often suffered from concomitant diseases. They were readmitted to hospital more often. They showed a comparatively higher increase in indices of self-care and a significant increase in physical performance tests. CONCLUSION: Higher medical care expenses of multimorbid cardiac inpatients are no contraindication against rehabilitation, because even in this group the specific rehabilitation aims of the healthcare payers can be reached.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Cardiac Rehabilitation/psychology , Cardiac Rehabilitation/statistics & numerical data , Disabled Persons/psychology , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Self Care/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Exercise Tolerance , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Self Care/psychology , Treatment Outcome
4.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg) ; 54(1): 45-52, 2015 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25675321

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: So far, for center comparisons in inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR), the objective outcome quality was neglected because of challenges in quantifying the overall success of CR. In this article, a multifactorial benchmark model measuring the individual rehabilitation success is presented. METHODS: In 21 rehabilitation centers, 5123 patients were consecutively enrolled between 01/2010 and 12/2012 in the prospective multicenter registry EVA-Reha (®) Cardiology. Changes in 13 indicators in the areas cardiovascular risk factors, physical performance and subjective health during rehabilitation were evaluated according to levels of severity. Changes were only rated for patients who needed a medical intervention. Additionally, the changes had to be clinically relevant. Therefore Minimal Important Differences (MID) were predefined. Ratings were combined to a single score, the multiple outcome criterion (MEK). RESULTS: The MEK was determined for all patients (71.7 ± 7.4 years, 76.9% men) and consisted of an average of 5.6 indicators. After risk adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical baseline parameters, MEK was used for center ranking. In addition, individual results of indicators were compared with means of all study sites. CONCLUSION: With the method presented here, the outcome quality can be quantified and outcome-based comparisons of providers can be made.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Diseases/rehabilitation , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Aged , Germany , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Treatment Outcome
5.
Hamostaseologie ; 34(3): 226-32, 2014.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24888786

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: A recently developed multiparameter computer-aided expert system (TheMa) for guiding anticoagulation with phenprocoumon (PPC) was validated by a prospective investigation in 22 patients. The PPC-INR-response curve resulting from physician guided dosage was compared to INR values calculated by "twin calculation" from TheMa recommended dosage. Additionally, TheMa was used to predict the optimal time to perform surgery or invasive procedures after interruption of anticogulation therapy. RESULTS: Comparison of physician and TheMa guided anticoagulation showed almost identical accuracy by three quantitative measures: Polygon integration method (area around INR target) 616.17 vs. 607.86, INR hits in the target range 166 vs. 161, and TTR (time in therapeutic range) 63.91 vs. 62.40 %. After discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy, calculating the INR phase-out curve with TheMa INR prognosis of 1.8 was possible with a standard deviation of 0.50 ± 0.59 days. CONCLUSION: Guiding anticoagulation with TheMa was as accurate as Physician guided therapy. After interruption of anticoagulant therapy, TheMa may be used for calculating the optimal time performing operations or initiating bridging therapy.


Subject(s)
Drug Monitoring/methods , Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted/methods , International Normalized Ratio/methods , Phenprocoumon/administration & dosage , Prothrombin Time/methods , Thrombosis/blood , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Administration, Oral , Aged , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/blood , Blood Coagulation/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phenprocoumon/blood , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Thrombosis/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome
6.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg) ; 53(1): 31-7, 2014 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24217887

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac rehabilitation is designed for patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases or functional disabilities. The aim of a cardiac rehabilitation is to improve overall physical health, psychological well-being, physical function, the ability to participate in social life and help patients to change their habits. Regarding the heterogeneity of these aims measuring of the effect of cardiac rehabilitation is still a challenge. This study recommends a concept to assess the effects of cardiac rehabilitation regarding the individual change of relevant quality indicators. METHODS: With "EVA-Reha; cardiac rehabilitation" the Medical Advisory Service of Statutory Health Insurance Funds in Rhineland-Palatinate, Alzey (MDK Rheinland-Pfalz) developed a software to collect data set including sociodemographic and diagnostic data and also the results of specific assessments. The project was funded by the Techniker Krankenkasse, Hamburg, and supported by participating rehabilitation centers. From 01. July 2010 to 30. June 2011 1309 patients (age 71.5 years, 76.1% men) from 13 rehabilitation centers were consecutively enrolled. 13 quality indicators in 3 scales were developed for evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation: 1) cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides), 2) exercise capacity (resting heart rate, maximal exercise capacity, maximal walking distance, heart failure [NYHA classification], and angina pectoris [CCS classification]) and 3) subjective health (IRES-24: pain, somatic health, psychological wellbeing and depression as well as anxiety on the HADS). The study was prospective; data of patients were assessed at entry and discharge of rehabilitation. To measure the success of rehabilitation each parameter was graded in severity classes at entry and discharge. For each of the 13 quality indicators changes of severity class were rated in a rating matrix. For indicators without a requirement for medical care neither at entry nor at discharge no rating was performed. RESULTS: The grading into severity classes as well as the minimal important differences were given for the 13 quality indicators. The result of rehabilitation can be demonstrated in suitable form by means of rating of the 13 quality indicators according to a clinical population. The rating model differs well between clinically changed and unchanged patients for the quality indicators. CONCLUSION: The result of cardiac rehabilitation can be assessed with 13 quality indicators measured at entry and dis­charge of the rehabilitation program. If a change into a more ­favorable category at the end of rehabilitation could be achieved it was counted as a success. The 13 quality indicators can be used to assess the individual result as well as the result of a population--e. g. all patients of a clinic in a specific time period. In addition, the assessment and rating of relevant quality indicators can be used for comparisons of rehabilitation centers.


Subject(s)
Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Diseases/rehabilitation , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Patient Outcome Assessment , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Severity of Illness Index , Aged , Algorithms , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
7.
Hamostaseologie ; 30(4): 183-9, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21057712

ABSTRACT

Oral anticoagulation using vitamin K antagonists has been established for over 50 years. Although it is highly effective in preventing thromboembolic incidents, its therapeutic control still remains problematic. Therefore, a computer-aided approach is recommended for deriving dosages. Up to now, the dosage is often based on the visual inspection of previous INR measurements, average weekly doses, and the INR target range. Statistical variations of measurement results and time-delayed effects of dosages, however, frequently result in the misinterpretation of data and suggest pseudo-trends. Treating physicians are not only responsible for determining the patient-specific maintenance dose, but must also respond to deviating INR values, overdosage or underdosage, initiate the oral anticoagulation therapy, and control the INR level in case of a new target range (bridging). Instructive examples are provided to illustrate the described difficulties. A computer-aided expert system is currently developed to ensure the therapeutic safety under the specified conditions. We present preliminary results from a study designed to validate mathematical models underlying such expert systems.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Phenprocoumon/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/metabolism , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted/methods , Humans , International Normalized Ratio , Kinetics , Phenprocoumon/administration & dosage , Phenprocoumon/metabolism , Safety
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...