A phase 2, multicenter, open-label study of anti-LAG-3 ieramilimab in combination with anti-PD-1 spartalizumab in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

Ieramilimab, a humanized anti-LAG-3 monoclonal antibody, was well tolerated in combination with the anti-PD-1 antibody spartalizumab in a phase 1 study. This phase 2 study aimed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of combination treatment in patients with selected advanced (locally advanced or metastatic) solid malignancies. Eligible patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), mesothelioma, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were grouped depending on prior anti-PD-1/L1 therapy (anti-PD-1/L1 naive or anti-PD-1/L1 pretreated). Patients received ieramilimab (400 mg) followed by spartalizumab (300 mg) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), along with safety, pharmacokinetics, and biomarker assessments. Of 235 patients, 142 were naive to anti-PD-1/L1 and 93 were pretreated with anti-PD-1/L1 antibodies. Durable responses (>24 months) were seen across all indications for patients naive to anti-PD-1/L1 and in melanoma and RCC patients pretreated with anti-PD1/L1. The most frequent study drug-related AEs were pruritus (15.5%), fatigue (10.6%), and rash (10.6%) in patients naive to anti-PD-1/L1 and fatigue (18.3%), rash (14.0%), and nausea (10.8%) in anti-PD-1/L1 pretreated patients. Biomarker assessment indicated higher expression of T-cell-inflamed gene signature at baseline among responding patients. Response to treatment was durable (>24 months) in some patients across all enrolled indications, and safety findings were in accordance with previous and current studies exploring LAG-3/PD-1 blockade.

Phase I/II study of the LAG-3 inhibitor ieramilimab (LAG525) ± anti-PD-1 spartalizumab (PDR001) in patients with advanced malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) is an inhibitory immunoreceptor that negatively regulates T-cell activation. This paper presents preclinical characterization of the LAG-3 inhibitor, ieramilimab (LAG525), and phase I data for the treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors with ieramilimab ±the anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody, spartalizumab. METHODS: Eligible patients had advanced/metastatic solid tumors and progressed after, or were unsuitable for, standard-of-care therapy, including checkpoint inhibitors in some cases. Patients received ieramilimab ±spartalizumab across various dose-escalation schedules. The primary objective was to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase II dose (RP2D). RESULTS: In total, 255 patients were allocated to single-agent ieramilimab (n=134) and combination (n=121) treatment arms. The majority (98%) had received prior antineoplastic therapy (median, 3). Four patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities in each treatment arm across various dosing cohorts. No MTD was reached. The RP2D on a 3-week schedule was declared as 400 mg ieramilimab plus 300 mg spartalizumab and, on a 4-week schedule (once every 4 weeks; Q4W), as 800 mg ieramilimab plus 400 mg spartalizumab; tumor target (LAG-3) suppression with 600 mg ieramilimab Q4W was predicted to be similar to the Q4W, RP2D schedule. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 75 (56%) and 84 (69%) patients in the single-agent and combination arms, respectively. Most common TRAEs were fatigue, gastrointestinal, and skin disorders, and were of mild severity; seven patients experienced at least one treatment-related serious adverse event in the single-agent (5%) and combination group (5.8%). Antitumor activity was observed in the combination arm, with 3 (2%) complete responses and 10 (8%) partial responses in a mixed population of tumor types. In the combination arm, eight patients (6.6%) experienced stable disease for 6 months or longer versus six patients (4.5%) in the single-agent arm. Responding patients trended towards having higher levels of immune gene expression, including CD8 and LAG3, in tumor tissue at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Ieramilimab was well tolerated as monotherapy and in combination with spartalizumab. The toxicity profile of ieramilimab in combination with spartalizumab was comparable to that of spartalizumab alone. Modest antitumor activity was seen with combination treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02460224.

Pharmacokinetics of Ribociclib in Subjects With Hepatic Impairment.

Ribociclib is an orally bioavailable, highly selective small-molecule inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. It is currently approved for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer with a starting dose of 600 mg. Both in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that ribociclib is primarily metabolized in the liver via cytochrome P450 3A4. A phase 1, open-label, multicenter, parallel cohort, single-oral-dose study was conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetics of ribociclib in subjects with varying degrees of hepatic impairment as measured by the Child-Pugh classification. Subjects were divided into 4 cohorts determined by their degree of hepatic impairment: normal, mild, moderate, or severe. Thirty subjects were enrolled and received a single 400 mg dose of ribociclib. Ribociclib exposure was similar in subjects with mild hepatic impairment compared with subjects with normal hepatic function, but was increased by approximately 30% in subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment. At a dose of 400 mg, ribociclib was generally well tolerated in all subjects regardless of the level of hepatic impairment. These results indicate that no dose adjustment (recommended dose of ribociclib is 600 mg daily, 3 weeks on and 1 week off) is necessary for patients with mild hepatic impairment but that a reduced dose of 400 mg daily, 3 weeks on and 1 week off in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment is recommended.

Phase Ib Dose-escalation/Expansion Trial of Ribociclib in Combination With Everolimus and Exemestane in Postmenopausal Women with HR+, HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Report results of the phase Ib dose-escalation/expansion study of triplet therapy with cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor (ribociclib), mTOR inhibitor (everolimus), and endocrine therapy (exemestane). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), pretreated, advanced breast cancer (ABC) were enrolled. The primary objective of the dose-escalation phase was to estimate the MTD and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of triplet therapy through evaluation of the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the RP2D were evaluated in the dose-expansion phase in patients naïve or refractory to CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. RESULTS: Patients (N = 116) received triplet therapy (n = 83 in the dose-escalation phase; n = 33 in the dose-expansion phase). A dose-dependent drug-drug interaction was observed for everolimus, with exposure increasing two- to fourfold in the presence of ribociclib. The RP2D was determined to be ribociclib 300 mg once daily, 3 weeks on/1 week off in a 4-week cycle, plus everolimus 2.5 mg once daily, plus exemestane 25 mg once daily taken with food. The safety profile was consistent with the known profiles of the combination partners, and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was observed. Higher ESR1 gene expression trended with better treatment response to triplet therapy; higher gene expression of MAPK pathway genes trended with worse treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: Triplet therapy with endocrine therapy and mTOR and CDK4/6 inhibition provides clinical benefit and an acceptable safety profile in previously treated postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC.

Evaluation of Absolute Oral Bioavailability and Bioequivalence of Ribociclib, a Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects.

Ribociclib, a selective and potent cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, has demonstrated safety and efficacy in combination with endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced breast cancer. In 2 open-label crossover studies in healthy participants, the absolute bioavailability of a single oral dose of a ribociclib 600-mg tablet (n = 16) was compared with a single intravenous ribociclib infusion of 150 mg (n = 16), and the bioequivalence of a ribociclib 600-mg tablet (n = 31) and a ribociclib 600-mg capsule (n = 31) was evaluated. The pharmacokinetics of ribociclib and its major metabolite, LEQ803, were assessed in both studies. The oral bioavailability of the 600-mg ribociclib tablet was 65.8% (90% confidence interval [CI], 59.1-73.2%). The geometric mean systemic clearance of ribociclib was moderate (40.2 L/h; 27.4% intersubject variability [CV%]) compared with hepatic blood flow, and the geometric mean volume of distribution was high (979 L; 25.2 CV%). LEQ803-to-ribociclib metabolic ratios were 0.198 for the oral administration and 0.125 for intravenous infusion. Bioequivalence of the tablet and capsule formulations was demonstrated for ribociclib. The geometric mean ratios of maximum concentration and area under the curve from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration and to infinity were 1.01, 1.00, and 0.937, respectively, within the predefined bioequivalence range of 0.80 to 1.25. The median time to reach maximum concentration was 3 hours with both formulations. No serious adverse events were observed in either study.

Ribociclib Drug-Drug Interactions: Clinical Evaluations and Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Guide Drug Labeling.

Ribociclib is approved in combination with endocrine therapy as initial endocrine-based therapy for HR-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Ribociclib is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4 and, in vitro, is an inhibitor of CYP3A and CYP1A2. Ritonavir (a strong CYP3A inhibitor) increased ribociclib 400 mg single-dose area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) by 3.2-fold, whereas rifampin (a strong CYP3A inducer) decreased ribociclib AUC by 89% in healthy volunteers (HVs). Multiple 400 mg ribociclib doses increased midazolam (CYP3A substrate) AUC by 3.8-fold and caffeine (CYP1A2 substrate) AUC by 1.2-fold vs. each agent alone. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed integrating in vitro, preclinical, and clinical data of HVs and patients with cancer. Data predictions indicated that multiple 600 mg ribociclib doses increased midazolam AUC by 5.85-fold and ritonavir increased ribociclib 600 mg multiple dose AUC by 1.31-fold in cancer patients. Based on pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy data, and PBPK modeling, dosing modifications for ribociclib recommend avoiding concurrent use of strong CYP3A inhibitors/inducers, and caution regarding using CYP3A substrates with narrow therapeutic indices.

Food Effect Projections via Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling: Predictive Case Studies.

Food can alter the absorption of orally administered drugs. Biopharmaceutics physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling offers the possibility to simulate a compound's pharmacokinetics under fasted or fed states. To advance the utility of PBPK modeling, with a view to regulatory impact, we have pooled our experience across 4 pharmaceutical companies to propose a general multistep PBPK workflow leveraging pre-existing clinical data for immediate-release formulations of Biopharmaceutics Classification System I and II compounds. With this strategy, we wish to promote pragmatic PBPK approaches for compounds where absorption is well understood, that is, compounds with moderate-to-high permeability that are not substrates for uptake transporters. Five case studies demonstrate how food effect can be well predicted using appropriately established and validated models. The case studies integrate solubility and dissolution data for initial model development and apply a "middle-out" validation with clinical data in one prandial state. Then, whenever possible, a validation against both fasted and fed state data is recommended before application of the models prospectively for to-be-marketed formulations. Thus, when combined with limited clinical data, PBPK models could be used to simulate outcomes for new doses, formulations, or active pharmaceutical ingredient forms, in lieu of a clinical food-effect study.

Optimization of Voriconazole Therapy for the Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections in Adults.

Therapeutic concentrations of voriconazole in invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are ensured using a drug monitoring approach, which relies on attainment of steady-state pharmacokinetics. For voriconazole, time to reach steady state can vary from 5-7 days, not optimal for critically ill patients. We developed a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model-based approach to predict doses that can maximize the net benefit (probability of efficacy-probability of adverse events) and ensure therapeutic concentrations, early on during treatment. The label-recommended 200 mg voriconazole dose resulted in attainment of targeted concentrations in ≥80% patients in the case of Candida spp. infections, as compared to only 40-50% patients, with net benefit ranging from 5.8-61.8%, in the case of Aspergillus spp. infections. Voriconazole doses of 300-600 mg were found to maximize the net benefit up to 51-66.7%, depending on the clinical phenotype (due to CYP2C19 status and pantoprazole use) of the patient and type of Aspergillus infection.

Current strategies to streamline pharmacotherapy for older adults.

Although the term "personalized medicine" has been associated in many cases with pharmacogenomics, its definition embraces the use of specific biomarkers and covariates to help in the selection of medical treatments and procedures which are best for each patient. While several efforts have been performed for the tailored selection of therapies and dosing regimens in the general population, developing personalized medicine initiatives for elderly patients remains understudied. The personalized drug therapy for older patients requires the consideration of anatomical, physiological and functional alterations in a multimorbid setting requiring multiple medications. The present review focuses on currently employed qualitative and quantitative precision medicine approaches for elderly patients and discusses some of the associated challenges and limitations. Furthermore, the use of and confidence in physiologically-based approaches for optimal dose selection in this understudied yet clinically important patient population will be highlighted and discussed.

Ribociclib Bioavailability Is Not Affected by Gastric pH Changes or Food Intake: In Silico and Clinical Evaluations.

Ribociclib (KISQALI), a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor approved for the first-line treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer with an aromatase inhibitor, is administered with no restrictions on concomitant gastric pH-elevating agents or food intake. The influence of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on ribociclib bioavailability was assessed using 1) biorelevant media solubility, 2) physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, 3) noncompartmental analysis (NCA) of clinical trial data, and 4) population PK (PopPK) analysis. This multipronged approach indicated no effect of gastric pH changes on ribociclib PK and served as a platform for supporting ribociclib labeling language, stating no impact of gastric pH-altering agents on the absorption of ribociclib, without a dedicated drug-drug interaction trial. The bioequivalence of ribociclib exposure with or without a high-fat meal was demonstrated in a clinical trial. Lack of restrictions on ribociclib dosing may facilitate better patient compliance and therefore clinical benefit.

Quantitative clinical pharmacology for size and age scaling in pediatric drug development: A systematic review.

The establishment of drug dosing in children is often hindered by the lack of actual pediatric efficacy and safety data. To overcome this limitation, scaling approaches are frequently employed to leverage adult clinical information for informing pediatric dosing. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the different scaling approaches used in pediatric pharmacotherapy as well as their proper implementation in drug development and clinical use. We will start out with a brief overview of the current regulatory requirements in pediatric drug development, followed by a review of the most commonly employed scaling approaches in increasing order of complexity ranging from simple body weight-based dosing to physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approaches. Each of the presented approaches has advantages and limitations, which will be highlighted throughout the course of the review by the use of clinically-relevant examples. The choice of the approach employed consequently depends on the clinical question at hand and the availability of sufficient clinical data. The main effort while establishing and qualifying these scaling approaches should be directed towards the development of safe and effective dosing regimens in children rather than identifying the best model, ie models should be fit for purpose.