Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Phys Med ; 100: 129-134, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35809498

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Fluoroscopy guided interventional procedures guarantee high benefits for patients, but are associated with high levels of radiation exposure for the medical staff. Their increasing use and complexity results in even higher radiation exposures, with a risk to exceed the annual dose limit of 20 mSv for the eye lens. The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential dose reduction of eye lens exposure for lead glasses and for two types of visors (half and full), used by physicians performing interventional procedures. METHODS: Eye lens dose measurements were carried out on an anthropomorphic phantom simulating a physician performing a fluoroscopy guided interventional procedure. Dose reduction factors were calculated using high sensitivity thermoluminescent dosimeters. Moreover, a spatial dose distribution was generated for the two visors. RESULTS: The dose reduction coefficient was found to be 1.6 for the glasses, 1.2 for the half visor and 4.5 for the full visor. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal radiation protection requires a combination of different radiation protection equipment. Full visors that cover all the face of the operator are recommended, as they absorb scattered radiation reaching the eyes from all directions. Full visors should be prioritized over radiation protection glasses for cases where other protective equipment such as ceiling shielding cannot be used.


Subject(s)
Lens, Crystalline , Occupational Exposure , Radiation Exposure , Radiation Protection , Drug Tapering , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiology, Interventional
3.
Phys Med ; 99: 10-15, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35598480

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Dose management systems (DMS's) have been widely used for radiation dose data collection and analysis, and have been proven useful for optimization. Although DMS's are used for patient dosimetry, a quality assurance (QA) program has not yet been developed. The aim of this work was to propose vendor neutral quality tests and discuss how QA can be established for DMS's to ensure robustness and quality of patient dose data. MATERIALS & METHODS: Different DMS's functions were organized in three groups according to their complexity. As basic functions, we defined those that depend on simple data collection and require data verification. Intermediate functions provide calculations such as effective dose or higher dose alerts, while the advanced group aims to address complicated analyses, such as peak skin dose calculations. RESULTS: An Excel file was developed that includes quality tests on basic and intermediate functions for different modalities (radiography, interventional radiology, CT and mammography) and is provided as Annex. For advanced functionalities, tests are discussed to guide medical physics experts to design their QA program as appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: The QA program is intended to ensure the trustworthy functioning for applications in normal circumstances and patient outliers. As DMS's are systems with regular upgrades, the associated QA program should be a dynamic process that takes into account the functionalities of the DMS and its application in the clinics. Medical physics experts should ensure the safety and accuracy of DMS's, as an essential component in patient dosimetry - part of their mission.


Subject(s)
Quality Assurance, Health Care , Radiometry , Humans , Mammography
4.
Phys Med ; 94: 102-109, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35030383

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patient shielding during medical X-ray imaging has been increasingly criticized in the last years due to growing evidence that it often provides minimal benefit and may even compromise image quality. In Europe, and as also shown in a short assessment in Switzerland, the use of patient shielding is inhomogeneous. The aim of this study was to systematically review recent literature in order to assess benefits and appraise disadvantages related to the routine use of patient shielding. METHODS: To evaluate benefits and disadvantages related to the application of patient shielding in radiological procedures, a systematic literature review was performed for CT, radiography, mammography and fluoroscopy-guided medical X-ray imaging. In addition, reports from medical physics societies and authorities of different countries were considered in the evaluation. RESULTS: The literature review revealed 479 papers and reports on the topic, from which 87 qualified for closer analysis. The review considered in- and out-of-plane patient shielding as well as shielding for pregnant and pediatric patients. Dose savings and other dose and non-dose related effects of patient shielding were considered in the evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Although patient shielding has been used in radiological practice for many years, its use is no longer undisputed. The evaluation of the systematic literature review of recent studies and reports shows that dose savings are rather minimal while significant dose- and non-dose-related detrimental effects are present. Consequently, the routine usage of patient protection shielding in medical X-ray imaging can be safely discontinued for all modalities and patient groups.


Subject(s)
Radiation Protection , Radiology , Child , Female , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Pregnancy , Radiation Dosage , Radiography , X-Rays
5.
BMC Med Imaging ; 13: 22, 2013 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23895057

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The frequency of CT procedures has registered a significant increase over the last decade, which led at the international level to an increasing concern on the radiological risk associated with the use of CT especially in paediatrics. This work aimed at investigating the use of computed tomography in Switzerland, following the evolution of CT frequency and dose data over a decade and comparing it to data reported in other countries. METHODS: The frequency and dose data related to CT are obtained by means of a nationwide survey. National frequencies were established by projecting the collected data, using the ratio of the number of CT units belonging to the respondents to the total number of CT units in the country. The effective doses per examination were collected during an auditing campaign. RESULTS: In 2008 about 0.8 Million CT procedures (~100 CT examinations/1000 population) were performed in the country, leading to a collective effective dose of more than 6000 man.Sv (0.8 mSv/caput). In a decade the frequency of CT examinations averaged over the population and the associated average effective dose per caput increased by a factor of 2.2 and 2.9 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although the contribution of CT to the total medical X-rays is 6% in terms of the frequency, it represents 68% in terms of the collective effective dose. These results are comparable to those reported in a number of countries in Europe and America with similar health level.


Subject(s)
Body Burden , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Risk Assessment , Switzerland/epidemiology
6.
Health Phys ; 103(3): 317-21, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22850238

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the radiation exposure of the Swiss population to interventional procedures. A nationwide survey was conducted in Switzerland. The annual effective dose per capita due to interventional procedures was found to be 0.14 mSv, corresponding to 12% of the total dose. Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions were found to be the most frequent and the most irradiating interventional procedures, accounting for 52% of the total examination frequency and 64% of the dose delivered to the population. Switzerland stands at the same level as other countries in terms of effective dose per capita due to interventional radiology.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Data Collection , Humans , Internationality , Organ Specificity , Radiation Dosage , Switzerland
7.
Health Phys ; 102(3): 263-70, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22420018

ABSTRACT

Nationwide surveys on radiation dose to the population from medical radiology are recommended in order to follow the trends in population exposure and ensure radiation protection.The last survey in Switzerland was conducted in 1998,and the annual effective dose from medical radiology was estimated to be 1 mSv y j(-1) per capita. The purpose of this work was to follow the trends in diagnostic radiology between 1998 and 2008 in Switzerland and determine the contribution of different modalities and types of examinations to the collective effective dose from medical x-rays. For this reason, an online database(www.raddose.ch) was developed. All healthcare providers who hold a license to run an x-ray unit in the country were invited to participate in the survey. More than 225 examinations, covering eight radiological modalities, were included in the survey. The average effective dose for each examination was reassessed. Data from about 3,500 users were collected (42% response rate). The survey showed that the annual effective dose was 1.2 mSv/capita in 2008. The most frequent examinations are conventional and dental radiographies (88%). The contribution of computed tomography was only 6% in terms of examination frequency but 68% in terms of effective dose. The comparison with other countries showed that the effective dose per capita in Switzerland was in the same range as in other countries with similar healthcare systems, although the annual number of examinations performed in Switzerland was higher.


Subject(s)
Radiography/trends , Data Collection , Female , Fluoroscopy/adverse effects , Fluoroscopy/statistics & numerical data , Fluoroscopy/trends , Health Physics , Humans , Male , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection , Radiography/adverse effects , Radiography/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Dental/adverse effects , Radiography, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Dental/trends , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Radiography, Interventional/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Interventional/trends , Radiometry , Switzerland , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...