Peripartum Ηysterectomy: A Four-Year Obstetric and Anesthetic Experience in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Greece.

Background Although peripartum hysterectomy (PH) is a life-saving procedure in cases of abnormal placentation and postpartum hemorrhage, it can be associated with major obstetric and anesthetic complications. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the incidence, etiology, perioperative anesthetic and obstetric management, complications, and fetal outcomes in women undergoing PH in a single tertiary referral hospital in Greece. Methodology This was a retrospective analysis of medical records of women who underwent emergency or elective PH in our hospital between January 2015 and December 2018. Results During the study period, 69 women who underwent a PH were identified. The incidence rate of elective and emergency PH was 4 and 1.2 per 1,000 deliveries, respectively. The main indication for PH was abnormal placentation (81.2%), followed by uterine atony (13%). Conversion to general anesthesia (GA) was performed in 21 (30.4%) cases. Conclusions This study showed a high prevalence of PH in our hospital compared to high-income countries. A neuraxial-only technique may be a safe alternative in individual cases of abnormal placentation. Conversion to GA can be reserved for complex surgical cases when massive hemorrhage is anticipated and, if possible, after the neonate has been delivered.

Do techniques of surgical management of ovarian endometrioma affect ovarian reserve? A narrative review.

Endometriotic ovarian cysts are one of the more common gynecological disorders found in reproductive-aged and infertile women. The aim of this review is to summarise information regarding the effect of surgical treatment of endometrioma on ovarian reserve. In women with endometrioma ovarian reserve is decreased compared to similarly aged healthy women and surgical management techniques cause an additional reduction. Evidence suggests that laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy via stripping is the preferable surgical technique for management of endometrioma, compared with excisional/ablative techniques, in the fields of pain improvement, spontaneous pregnancy rates, and ovarian cyst recurrences. Ablation techniques, combined technique and three-step approach demonstrate a less decline in anti-Müllerian hormone postoperatively. A successful operation involves not only removal of ovarian pathology, but also maintenance of ovarian function and future reproductive potential. Patients should be counselled about the risks of surgery and the management plan should be individualised to patient's symptoms and reproductive goals.

A simple technique for suspension and stabilization of retrieval bag and adnexa by anchoring to the abdominal wall.

We describe a useful technique, in laparoscopic cystectomy in-a-bag, for suspension and stabilization of endobag and adnexa using temporary sutures. It intends to create an isolated field to avoid spillage of the cyst content into the abdomen in case of rupture, thereby allowing the safe laparoscopic removal of ovarian masses.

"Do it cheaper": A cost-effective Endobag for small specimens.

A simple technique that permits to reduce the cost during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Small specimens may be retrieved with the use of a modified urine pediatric bag.

Mechanical bowel preparation before gynecologic laparoscopic procedures: Is it time to abandon this practice?

AIM: To examine the influence of mechanical bowel preparation on surgical field visualization and patients' quality of life during benign gynecologic laparoscopic procedures. METHODS: A single blind, randomized, controlled trial was undertaken with laparoscopic gynecologic surgical patients to one of the following three groups: liquid diet on the preoperative day; mechanical bowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution; minimal residue diet for 3 days. Primary outcomes included assessment of the condition of small and large bowel and the overall quality of the surgical field. Additional measures included assessment of patients' preoperative symptoms, tolerance of the preparation method and compliance to the protocol, postoperative symptoms and bowel function. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four patients were randomized as follows: 49 to liquid diet, 47 to mechanical bowel preparation, and 48 to minimal residue diet. Most characteristics were similar across groups. The intraoperative surgical view and the condition of large and small bowel were equal or inferior at the patients who received mechanical bowel preparation compared with the other groups. The 4-point Likert scale scoring for small bowel (2.51 vs. 2.72 vs. 2.81, p = 0.04), large bowel (2.26 vs. 2.38 vs. 2.48, p = 0.32) and overall operative field quality (2.34 vs. 2.67 vs. 2.67, p = 0.03) demonstrated no advantage from the use of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation over liquid diet and minimal residue diet, respectively. Preoperative discomfort was significantly greater in the mechanical bowel preparation group. CONCLUSION: Mechanical bowel preparation before gynecologic laparoscopic operations for benign pathology could be safely abandoned. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN59502124 (No 59502124).

Laparoscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy: Report of two cases with video-presentation of different operative techniques and literature review.

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy. We present two different techniques of laparoscopic management of CSP, with the concomitant repair of the coexisting uterine isthmocele. The first case is a combination of diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopic extraction of conception products, and the second technique is a combination of laparoscopy and guided Dilation & Curettage. We also conducted a thorough review of the literature to present all cases of laparoscopic treatment of CSP, focusing on the surgical technique, the operation outcome, and the future pregnancies. Laparoscopy is a potential effective treatment of CSP.

Laparoscopic Cervical Cerclage: Do Not Catch the Wrong Needle, or What to Do Next if It Happens!

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To present a technique to correct the misplacement of tape during laparoscopic cervical cerclage. Catching and introducing the wrong needle resulted in a knot formed around the right adnexa. DESIGN: Step-by-step demonstration of the mistake and the technique to correct it. SETTING: A patient para 0+V (V corresponds to 5) with cervical insufficiency was managed with laparoscopic interval cerclage [1-3]. The patient's 2 most recent pregnancies had been managed with emergency transvaginal cerclage, which failed to prolong her gestation beyond 24 weeks. INTERVENTIONS: Before the cerclage procedure a 2.0 × 0.8-cm deep endometriotic nodule was excised. Both curved needles were straightened extracorporeally, and the tape was dropped inside the peritoneal cavity. The first needle was introduced successfully through the right side. After insertion of-what was believed to be-the same needle through the left side following the opposite direction, it was discovered that a tight knot had been formed around the right adnexa (Fig. 1). To avoid complete removal, the needleless tape was pulled back completely from the right side (Supplemental Fig. 1), and this end was stitched to a straight needle 2-0 polyglactin suture. The much thinner needle passed easily through the already created path, along with the tape (Supplemental Fig. 2), and the procedure was completed as planned (Supplemental Fig. 3). CONCLUSION: When performing laparoscopic cervical cerclage with the tape and needles inside the abdomen, it is important to keep both under constant view. In the event of misplacement, no need to completely remove the tape. The tape's cut end can still be reintroduced successfully, stitched to a straight needle suture.

Misoprostol vs vasopressin as a single hemostatic agent in laparoscopic myomectomy: Comparable, or just better than nothing?

AIM: Laparoscopic myomectomy may be associated with considerable blood loss, especially in patients in whom no specific hemostatic measures are used. We conducted this retrospective comparative study to investigate whether misoprosol is an effective and safe alternative to vasopressin when used as single hemostatic agent in laparoscopic myomectomy. METHODS: Two hundred cases undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy (-ies), were included. Of these, 50 pre-treated with vaginal misoprostol 400mcg 1 h before surgery (group 1), were compared with two historic consecutive groups: 100 patients treated with intraoperative intra-myometrial injection of dilute vasopressin (20 IU/100 mL normal saline) (group 2), and 50 treated without use of any hemostatic agent (group3). RESULTS: Mean procedure length did not differ significantly between the three groups (127.9 vs 100.6 vs 130.8 min). Mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 179.7 ± 200.0 mL in group 1, compared with 147.8 ± 171.8 mL in group 2 (P = 0.793) and 321.8 ± 246.0 mL in group 3, respectively (P < 0.001). EBL was lower in group 2 in most of the study's subgroups of patients stratified according to size and number of fibroids compared with group 1, with the exception of patients with ≥4 fibroids, and ≥7 cm in size. In these subgroups, misoprostol appeared more effective. Neither agent was associated with serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Vaginal misoprostol can be effective in reducing blood loss during laparoscopic myomectomy. Although rates of EBL are, in general, higher compared with those obtained with vasopressin, they are significantly reduced compared with those observed when no hemostatic agent is used. In extended procedures, vaginal misoprostol, due to its prolonged uterotonic action, may be associated with reduced blood loss compared with vasopressin.

Is it the right moment to include hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as standard in ovarian cancer management? A reappraisal.

Ovarian cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in women and often is diagnosed at an advanced stage with diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis. Since it is mainly confined to the peritoneal cavity, even after recurrence, it is an ideal target for loco-regional therapy. The standard therapeutic strategy of advanced ovarian cancer is cytoreductive surgery followed by systemic chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy used as adjuvant therapy has shown a survival benefit in ovarian cancer. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has several advantages over simple intraperitoneal chemotherapy. This has prompted the use of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by HIPEC in the management of ovarian cancer as a part of first and second line treatment for recurrent disease.