Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vascular ; 30(2): 357-364, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33884938

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Venus ulcers developed mainly due to reflux of incompetent venous valves in perforating veins. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 119 patients recruited over two years, with post-phelebtic venous leg ulcers, were randomly assigned into one of two groups: either to receive radiofrequency ablation of markedly incompetent perforators (Group A, n = 62 patients) or to receive conventional compression therapy (Group B, n = 57 patients). Follow-up duration required for ulcer healing continued for 24 months post randomization. RESULTS: Statistically significant shorter time to healing (ulcer complete healing or satisfactory clinical improvement) between both groups (56 patients, 90.3% of cases in Group A versus 44 patients 77.2% of cases in Group B) over the follow-up period of 24 months was attained (p = 0.001). Also, significantly different ulcer recurrence was recorded between both groups, 8 patients (12.9%) in Group A versus 19 patients (33.3%) in Group B (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In absence of deep venous obstruction, the monopolar radiofrequency ablation for incompetent perforators is a feasible and effective method that surpasses the traditional compression protocol for incompetent perforator-induced venous ulcers in terms of time required for healing even in the presence of unresolved deep venous valvular reflux.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Radiofrequency Ablation , Varicose Ulcer , Venous Insufficiency , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Humans , Radiofrequency Ablation/adverse effects , Recurrence , Varicose Ulcer/diagnosis , Varicose Ulcer/surgery , Venous Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Venous Insufficiency/etiology , Venous Insufficiency/surgery , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...