Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Fam Pract ; 27(3): 263-70, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20348163

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The achievement of quality of care constitutes a priority for modern health care systems. The objective of our study was to evaluate a quality improvement intervention in primary care of Cyprus. METHODS: In a two-arm non-randomized controlled study in primary care centres in Cyprus, all patients with hypertension (HTN) and diabetes (n = 539) were invited. In one urban and one rural centre, a quality improvement programme was implemented; two other centres (one urban and one rural) served as control practices. The intervention mainly consisted of the introduction of clinical disease management guidelines and an electronic medical record system. The primary outcome measurement was improvement of specific clinical indicators for HTN and diabetes. Patients' satisfaction was evaluated using the European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP) questionnaire over an 18-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Five hundred and four patients completed the study, 278 patients in the intervention practices and 226 patients in the control practices. Mean results for blood pressure, total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein-cholesterol and three annual performance measures (urine protein testing, dilated eye and foot examination) had improved at 18-month follow-up in the intervention as compared to the control group. There was no improvement of HbA1c levels. Patients' satisfaction improved in the intervention practices (improvement of 10/23 EUROPEP items) but decreased in the control group (decline of 20/23 items). CONCLUSIONS: A pilot multifaceted quality improvement intervention programme for patients with diabetes and HTN implemented in primary care settings in Cyprus showed promising results. Future studies need to involve a broader number of practices and patient populations.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypertension/drug therapy , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Adult , Clinical Trials as Topic , Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic , Cyprus , Female , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Pilot Projects , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 8: 181, 2008 Aug 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18752660

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Quality Improvement Interventions require significant financial investments, and therefore demand careful consideration in their design in order to maximize potential benefits. In this correspondence we present the methodological approach of a multifaceted quality improvement intervention aiming to improve quality of care in primary care, properly tailored for a country such as Cyprus where general practice is currently seeking recognition. METHODS: Our methodological approach was focused on the design of an open label, community-based intervention controlled trial using all patients from two urban and two rural public primary care centers diagnosed with hypertension and type II diabetes mellitus. The design of our intervention was grounded on a strong theoretical framework that included the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, and the Chronic Care Model, which synthesize evidence-based system changes in accordance with the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Theory of Reasoned Action. The primary outcome measure was improvement in the quality of care for two chronic diseases evaluated through specific clinical indicators, as well as the patient satisfaction assessed by the EUROPEP questionnaire and additional personal interviews. RESULTS: We designed a multifaceted quality improvement intervention model, supported by a varying degree of scientific evidence, tailored to local needs and specific country characteristics. Overall, the main components of the intervention were the development and adoption of an electronic medical record and the introduction of clinical guidelines for the management of the targeted chronic diseases facilitated by the necessary model of organizational changes. CONCLUSION: Health planners and policy makers need to be aware of the potential use of certain theoretical models and applied methodology as well as inexpensive tools that may be suitably tailored to the local needs, in order to effectively design quality improvement interventions in primary care settings.


Subject(s)
Primary Health Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Chronic Disease/therapy , Cyprus , Decision Support Techniques , Humans , Medical Records Systems, Computerized , Pilot Projects , Planning Techniques , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Program Evaluation , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...