Colorectal procedures with the novel Hugo™ RAS system: training process and case series report from a non-robotic surgical team.

BACKGROUND: The landscape of robotic surgery is evolving with the emergence of new platforms. However, reports on their applicability in different surgical fields are still limited and come from teams with robotics experience. This study aims to describe the training process for colorectal surgery with the Hugo™ RAS system of a robotics-inexperienced surgical team and present the initial patient series. METHODS: The training process is depicted, and data from the first 10 consecutive patients operated on for colorectal conditions with the Hugo™ RAS system by a surgical team with no prior experience in robotic surgery were prospectively recorded and analysed. RESULTS: The team received intensive training in robotic surgery and specifically in the Hugo™ RAS system previously to the first case. Between May 2023 and December 2023, 10 patients underwent colorectal procedures: 5 right colectomies, 3 sigmoid resections, 1 high rectal resection and 1 ventral mesh rectopexy. The first case was proctored by an expert. Median docking time was 14 min and median total operative time was 185 min. The only technical difficulty during the procedures was occasional clashing of robotic arms. None had to be converted, and no intraoperative or postoperative morbidity was recorded. Hospital stays ranged from 2 to 4 days. A median of 21 lymph nodes were yielded in the operations for malignant conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Common colorectal procedures can be safely performed using the Hugo™ RAS platform. Prior experience in robotic surgery is not a necessary requirement, but following a structured training program is essential.

Enfermedad diverticular de colon no complicada sintomática: revisión sistemática del diagnóstico y tratamiento / Management of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular colon disease: A systematic review of diagnosis and treatment

La enfermedad diverticular de colon (EDC) no complicada sintomática (EDCNCS) es una patología con elevada prevalencia en nuestro medio que afecta de manera importante la calidad de vida de los pacientes que la padecen. Los cambios recientes en la comprensión de la historia natural de esta enfermedad y los avances tecnológicos y farmacológicos han incrementado sustancialmente las opciones disponibles tanto para su diagnóstico como para el tratamiento. Sin embargo, el consenso que existe en cuanto al uso de estas opciones es pobre y en algunas ocasiones carente de evidencia científica. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática es esclarecer la evidencia científica existente y fundamentar la utilización de las diferentes opciones diagnósticas y terapéuticas en la EDCNCS, comparando las ventajas y desventajas entre estas, para sugerir finalmente un algoritmo diagnóstico-terapéutico para esta patología y al mismo tiempo proponer nuevas preguntas de investigación.(AU)

Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular colon disease (SUDCD) is a highly prevalent disease in our setting, which significantly affects the quality of life of patients. Recent changes in understanding the natural history of this disease and technological and pharmacological advances have increased the available options for both diagnosis and treatment. However, consensus regarding the use of these options is scarce and sometimes lacks scientific evidence. The objective of this systematic review is to clarify the existing scientific evidence and analyse the use of the different diagnostic and therapeutic options for SUDCD, comparing their advantages and disadvantages, to finally suggest a diagnostic-therapeutic algorithm for this pathology and, at the same time, propose new research questions.(AU)

Limited tumour progression beyond Milan criteria while on the waiting list does not result in unacceptable impairment of survival.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Defining optimum management of patients progressing beyond Milan criteria on the waiting list is a controversial topic. Our aim was to determine whether the policy of allowing a limited progression beyond enlistment criteria permits acceptable post-transplant outcomes in terms of survival and recurrence. METHODS: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma included on the waiting list for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) between January 1989 and December 2016 were analysed. Tumour features were assessed at inclusion on the waiting list, before OLT and at explant pathology. Patients were retained on the waiting list despite exceeding enlistment criteria if not presenting with macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic spread or cancer-related symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 495 patients constituted the target population. Comparison between the Milan-in (n = 434) and Milan-out (n = 61) groups showed statistically significant differences in: largest tumour size; BCLC stage; patients treated before OLT; alpha-fetoprotein, and time on the waiting list. Milan-out patients showed a significantly higher number of poorly differentiated nodules, satellitosis and microscopic vascular invasion. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year survival rate was 89.6%, 82.5%, 75%, and 55.5%, vs. 83.6%, 70.5%, 65.5%, and 53.9% for Milan-in/Milan-out patients, respectively. Recurrence rates at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years were 1.2%, 3.3%, 5.5%, and 10.8% vs. 7.1% 14.5%, 23%, and 23% for Milan-in and Milan-out patients, respectively (p <0.01). CONCLUSION: This study shows that although limited tumour progression without reaching major adverse predictors (vascular invasion, extrahepatic spread, cancer symptoms) has an expected impact on recurrence rate, overall survival remains above the minimum proposed benchmark of 65% at 5 years. The clinically relevant increase in tumour recurrence must be considered when analysing the benefit of this approach in the face of limited organ supply. LAY SUMMARY: When considering orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, optimum results are achieved when transplanting patients within the Milan criteria. However, the most appropriate strategy for patients who progress beyond these criteria while on the waiting list is still unclear. Herein, we show that transplantation is associated with acceptable overall survival in select patients who progress beyond the Milan criteria, although recurrence rates were notably higher. Therefore, the assessment of transplantation viability in these patients must consider the availability of organs and the impact on other patient categories.

Management of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular colon disease: A systematic review of diagnosis and treatment. / Enfermedad diverticular de colon no complicada sintomática: revisión sistemática del diagnóstico y tratamiento.

Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular colon disease (SUDCD) is a highly prevalent disease in our setting, which significantly affects the quality of life of patients. Recent changes in understanding the natural history of this disease and technological and pharmacological advances have increased the available options for both diagnosis and treatment. However, consensus regarding the use of these options is scarce and sometimes lacks scientific evidence. The objective of this systematic review is to clarify the existing scientific evidence and analyse the use of the different diagnostic and therapeutic options for SUDCD, comparing their advantages and disadvantages, to finally suggest a diagnostic-therapeutic algorithm for this pathology and, at the same time, propose new research questions.

Intention-to-treat curative liver resection in patients with "very early" intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare type of liver cancer. "Very early" ICC, defined as a solitary lesion of ≤ 2 cm in diameter, appears to have a favorable outcome. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the outcome of patients with "very early" ICC treated with curative surgical resection in an intention-to-treat analysis. METHODS: All patients with ICC undergoing surgical resection at the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (Spain) between April 2000 and December 2018 were reviewed, and those with evident "very early" ICC in preoperative imaging studies were selected. Results of histopathologic examination of the surgical specimen, postoperative complications, recurrence, and survival were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 89 patients operated for ICC during the study period, 7 (7.9%) met the "very early" criteria at preoperative imaging. Two (TNM 7th) and four (TNM 8th) patients were classified as stage I, following histological examination of their resected specimens. One patient presented with postoperative morbidity (grade II Clavien-Dindo). The median (IQR) hospital stay was 5 days (3-7). After a median follow-up of 23 months (IQR 11.9-80.6), recurrence was diagnosed in one case at 8.3 months after surgery. The overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 85.7%, 68.6%, and 68.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intention-to-treat curative surgery in "very early" ICC is associated with good results in terms of survival and recurrence. However, most patients presented more advanced stages in the definitive pathological analysis, associated with a lower survival. Future prospective multicenter studies are required to validate these encouraging data.

Benefits of laparoscopic liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal hypertension: a case-matched study.

BACKGROUND: The advantages of laparoscopy over open liver resection in patients with cirrhosis have been widely demonstrated. On the other hand, information on the role of minimally invasive liver surgery in the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of laparoscopic liver resection in selected cirrhotic patients with CSPH. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were treated with laparoscopic liver resection was conducted from December 2005 to April 2016. A total of 45 patients were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of clinically significant portal hypertension. Fifteen cirrhotic patients with CSPH were matched with 30 patients without CSPH. RESULTS: Overall, there were no differences in intraoperative results. No conversion to open surgery occurred in the CSPH group, and 3 patients were converted in the Non-CSPH group (0 vs. 10% p = 0.57). Only 2 (7%) patients in the Non-CSPH group and 1 (7%) in the CSPH group had relevant complications (modified Clavien-Dindo classification III). Two patients in the Non-CSPH group and one in the CSPH group developed transient ascites (7 vs. 7%). Postoperative hospital stay was similar in both groups, with a median of 4 days in the CSPH group and 3 days in the Non-CSPH group (p = 0.37). The median follow-up of the entire cohort was 38 months (range 7-100). Overall survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 100 and 87%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of survival (p = 0.8). CONCLUSION: This initial study showed that laparoscopic resection in patients with CSPH can be performed safely in well-selected patients and expand the current surgical indications in patients with CSPH. Prospective trials with a larger sample size are necessary to confirm these results.