Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 73(6): 1212-1216, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37427617

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors for hesitancy and uptake of coronavirus disease-2019 vaccine, and to compare perinatal outcomes in vaccinated and nonvaccinated pregnant women. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2021 to February 2022 at the Ruth Pfau Civil Hospital, Karachi, and the Holy Family Hospital, Karachi, and comprised pregnant women admitted in delivery suite for operative or vaginal delivery. Data was collected using a self-designed questionnaire which also explored knowledge about vaccine, contextual factors and reasons for and against vaccination. Perinatal outcomes included stillbirth, preterm delivery, low birth weight and Appearance-Pulse-Grimace-Activity-Respiration score. Also, 3cc blood was collected from the umbilical cord at the time of delivery, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique was used for antibodies titre. Data was analysed using SPSS 24. RESULTS: Of the 186 women, 114(61.3%) with mean age 27.9±4.1 years were vaccinated, and 72(38.7%) with mean age 27.5±5.2 years were not vaccinated. Physician's advise 104 (91.2%), vaccine safety and its effect on foetus 52(72.2%) were main determinants for vaccine uptake and refusal, repectively. Family and peer pressure was also responsible in 19(26.4%) cases for vaccine refusal. Body mass index, parity, level of education, socioeconomic status, history of coronavirus disease-2019 infection, booking status and presence of gestational diabetes mellitus were significantly different between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups (p<0.05). Antibody titers and Appearance-Pulse-Grimace-Activity-Respiration score at 1 minute were significantly higher in the group of vaccinated women (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine uptake was found to be low. Safety concern against vaccine, and doctor's advice were the main determinants for hesitancy and uptake. Antibody titers in newborns were higher in the group of vaccinated women.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Pregnancy , Female , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Pregnant Women , COVID-19 Vaccines , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Tertiary Care Centers , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Vaccination
2.
Pak J Med Sci ; 39(2): 323-329, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36950420

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare maternal and perinatal outcome of Ramadan fasting during pregnancy in women with/without gestational diabetes. Methods: This prospective case-control study was conducted at Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Unit 1 Ruth PKM Civil Hospital & Dow Medical College and Holy Family Hospital, Karachi during 1st April to 31st July, 2022. In this study normoglycemic pregnant women and those identified as gestational diabetes (n=52) on oral glucose tolerance test, who fasted during Ramadan were included. Women, on diet control or diet plus metformin were included in the study. Study questionnaire included demographic details, days of fasting, self-reported hypoglycemic episodes. Maternal outcomes included preterm birth, pregnancy induced hypertension. Perinatal outcome included hyperbilirubinemia, hypoglycemia, weight of placenta, and apgar score. Result: Eighty two women were included in the study, gestational diabetes (n=57) and normoglycemic (n=25). Average days of fasting were 16 ±9.0 days (range 5-30). Women with GDM were older (28.6 vs. 26.0 years, p-value=0.034), had raised levels of HbA1c (5.5 vs. 5.1, p-value=0.004), mean FBS (102.8 vs. 84.6 mg/dl, p-value <0.001), mean RBS (135.3 vs. 106.4 mg/dl, p-value <0.001) and had higher BMI at delivery (31.0 vs. 26.6 kg/m2, p-value=0.004). HbA1c (p-value=0.016) and head circumference of baby (p-value=0.038) were found lower in the group who fasted for more than 20 days among normoglycemic pregnant women. No other maternal and neonatal outcomes were found to be significantly affected by Ramadan fasting among pregnant women with/without GDM. Conclusion: Gestational diabetes do not affect maternal and perinatal outcome among pregnant women.

3.
Pak J Med Sci ; 37(5): 1262-1267, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34475896

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To see perception and knowledge of women about Ramadan fasting and maternal effects of fasting. METHODS: The study design was prospective, case-controlled. This study was conducted at Holy Family Hospital from 1st May 2020 to July 2020. Pregnant women with spontaneous conception and singleton pregnancies, who fasted for seven or more days, were cases, and those who did not fast were taken as controls. Questionnaire was filled regarding perception of women about maternal fasting. Primary maternal outcomes included preterm delivery, pregnancy induced hypertension, and gestational diabetes mellitus. The analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 16.0. RESULTS: A total of 215 women were included in the study, 123 women fasted, and 92 women did not fast. Only 2.8% of women knew that fasting is forbidden in pregnancy. Sixty five percent of women reported weakness as the main reason for not fasting. The rate of gestational diabetes, pregnancy induced hypertension and preterm delivery was higher among women who fasted (17% vs 14%, 7% vs 2%, 9% vs 9%) respectively, compared to non-fasting women, but were not found statistically significant. There was no difference in anthropometric measurements of newborn, among both groups. CONCLUSION: Ramadan fasting does not affect maternal outcomes during pregnancy.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...