Clinical outcomes and safety with trabectedin therapy in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas following failure of prior chemotherapy: results of a worldwide expanded access program study.

BACKGROUND: This expanded access program (EAP) was designed to provide trabectedin access for patients with incurable soft tissue sarcoma (STS) following progression of disease with standard therapy. The outcomes of trial participants accrued over approximately 5 years are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with advanced STS of multiple histologies, including leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma (L-sarcomas), following relapse or disease progression following standard-of-care chemotherapy, were enrolled. Trabectedin treatment cycles (1.5 mg/m(2), intravenously over 24 h) were repeated q21 days. Objective response, overall survival (OS), and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 1895 patients enrolled, 807 (43%) had evaluable objective response data, with stable disease reported in 343 (43%) as best response. L-sarcoma patients exhibited longer, OS compared with other histologies [16.2 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.1-19.5) versus 8.4 months (95% CI 7.1-10.7)], and a slightly higher objective response rate [6.9% (95% CI 4.8-9.6) versus 4.0% (95% CI 2.1-6.8)]. The median treatment duration was 70 days representing a median of three treatment cycles; 30% of patients received ≥ 6 cycles. Safety and tolerability in this EAP were consistent with prior clinical trial data. CONCLUSION: Results of this EAP are consistent with previous reports of trabectedin, demonstrating disease control despite a low incidence of objective responses in advanced STS patients after failure of standard chemotherapy. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00210665.

Management of recurrent desmoid tumor after surgery and radiation: role of cytotoxic and non-cytotoxic therapies.

Desmoid tumors frequently reoccur after surgery and radiation. The therapy of recurrent desmoid tumors is often unsatisfactory. Additional surgery may not be feasible. Drug therapy can sometimes be helpful, and even remarkably successful. Unfortunately, the rarity of desmoids precludes conduct of large clinical trials. Most series are small, anecdotal, and lack internal consistency. The lack of real understanding of desmoid biology has meant that therapies have, until now, been empirical rather than rationally designed. Nevertheless, a range of drugs is available to be utilized, including hormonal or hormonal antagonist therapy, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, biologic agents and cytotoxic chemotherapy. This review will utilize a patient case report to illustrate the problems frequently encountered in choosing therapy for patients with recurrent desmoid tumors. Based on this case, the review will explore the options available, as well as the process through which treatment options may be evaluated.

A phase I-II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine with filgrastim (rhG-CSF) support in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We designed a phase I-II trial of three active agents, paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to: 1) define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel with filgrastim (G-CSF) support; and 2) determine the overall response rate and median survival of patients treated on this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated cohorts of patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with ifosfamide 1.2-1.6 g/m2/day x 3 and vinorelbine 20-25 mg/m2/day x 3 and escalating doses of paclitaxel at 100-175 mg/m2 on day 2 with G-CSF support on a 21-day cycle. One prior experimental single-agent chemotherapy regimen was allowed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients, were enrolled on this trial: 27 on the phase I portion of the study and an additional 29 at the recommended phase II dose (RPTD). Thirteen patients had received prior chemotherapy. Paclitaxel doses of 175 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2 produced dose-limiting myelosuppression, and the RPTD was determined to be paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2/day on days 1-3 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/ day on days 1-3 with G-CSF support. The overall response rate was 18%, with a median survival of 6.1 months. Six of 35 patients (17%) treated at the RPTD achieved a partial response to therapy. Grade IV neutropenia was observed in 19 of 35 patients at this dose, with eight patients suffering febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: This non-cisplatin-containing three-drug regimen has substantial toxicity and low activity in advanced NSCLC, and does not seem to improve on prior regimens. It is unclear whether the lack of efficacy relates to an antagonistic reaction between the specific drugs, administration schedule, or to subtherapeutic doses of the individual agents.

Phase I study of vinorelbine, cisplatin, and concomitant thoracic radiation in the treatment of advanced chest malignancies.

PURPOSE: The cisplatin-vinorelbine regimen has superior activity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I trial to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of this regimen with concomitant thoracic radiation (RT) in patients with advanced chest malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced chest malignancies that required RT were enrolled onto this phase I study of standard chest radiation (30 daily 2-Gy fractions for a total of 60 Gy) and concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin starting at 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and vinorelbine starting at 20 mg/m2/wk. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were treated on this study. Two of three patients treated at the maximum-administered dose of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 per cycle and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2/wk experienced acute DLT (neutropenia), which required deescalation. The dose level of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/wk, although tolerated acutely, produced delayed esophagitis, which proved dose-limiting. The recommended phase II dose was cisplatin 80 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and vinorelbine 15 mg/m2 given 2 of every 3 weeks with concomitant chest RT. CONCLUSION: Concomitant chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine is feasible. The recommended phase II dose is cisplatin 80 mg/m2 every 3 weeks with vinorelbine 15 mg/m2 given twice over 3 weeks on a day 1/day 8 schedule. Esophagitis is the DLT, with neutropenia occurring at higher dose levels. A Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) phase II trial is currently underway to evaluate further the efficacy and toxicities of this regimen in unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Dihydro-5-azacytidine and cisplatin in the treatment of malignant mesothelioma: a phase II study by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

BACKGROUND: In a prior Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Phase II trial of patients with advanced, previously untreated mesothelioma, dihydro-5-azacytidine (DHAC) demonstrated a 17% response rate, including 1 complete response, with only mild myelosuppression. This Phase II study (CALGB 9031) was conducted to determine the effectiveness of and toxicities that would result from adding cisplatin to DHAC administered to the same patient population. METHODS: Thirty-six patients were treated with concurrent DHAC at 1500 mg/m2/day for 5 days by continuous infusion and cisplatin 15 mg/m2 daily for 5 days. Therapy was repeated every 3 weeks. Cisplatin was to be increased to 20 mg/m2 daily in subsequent cycles if toxicity was minimal. Therapy was continued until disease progression or excessive toxicity mandated discontinuation. RESULTS: Overall, 5 objective responses were observed in 29 evaluated patients (objective response rate, 17%). The median duration of response was 6.6 months. Median survival was 6.4 months, with a median time to clinical failure of 2.7 months. The major toxicity noted was significant chest/pericardial pain, as was observed with DHAC alone. There were 2 early deaths of unknown cause on Days 9 and 17 of therapy, respectively. Significant leukopenia was observed in 29% of patients, but there were no neutropenic fevers. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cisplatin to DHAC did not increase the response rate over that observed with DHAC alone in patients with mesothelioma; however, it did increase toxicity, especially leukopenia. This combination is not recommended for further studies involving mesothelioma patients.

A review of ifosfamide and vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Ifosfamide and vinorelbine have demonstrated single-agent activity against advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The dose-limiting toxicity of each agent is myelosuppression. Several trials have studied this combination to determine its toxicity and efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer. We conducted a dose-escalation study of vinorelbine in a novel (daily x 3) schedule with ifosfamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support to define the dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine in this combination. Other investigators have studied this combination in the phase II setting. In our phase I study involving 42 patients, the recommended phase II dose was vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.6 g/m2, each given on 3 consecutive days, followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The overall response rate was 40%, with a median survival of 50 weeks. Myelosuppression proved to be dose limiting for this regimen, without other major toxicities. Other groups have studied the ifosfamide/vinorelbine combination, and studies adding cisplatin to this regimen have been conducted as well. Given the tolerable toxicity and encouraging response rates and 1-year survival rate seen with this regimen, further investigation of the ifosfamide/vinorelbine regimen has continued in a phase II Cancer and Leukemia Group B trial. Further study of the potential application of the combination as induction therapy for stage III disease is warranted.

Phase I study of vinorelbine and ifosfamide in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We designed a phase I dose-escalation study of vinorelbine on a novel (daily-times-three) schedule with ifosfamide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support to define the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine in this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohorts of patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no prior chemotherapy received vinorelbine starting at 15 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3, and ifosfamide starting at 2.0 g/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3 with G-CSF support for all patients. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Plasma vinorelbine concentrations were also analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were treated. The median age was 58 years (range, 34 to 75) and 41 had a performance status of 0 or 1. The DLT was neutropenia and sepsis at a maximum-administered vinorelbine dose of 35 mg/m2 for 3 days. The recommended phase II dose was vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.6 g/m2 both given on 3 consecutive days. The overall response rate was 40% (17 of 42; all partial responders). The median survival duration was 50 weeks, with a 1-year survival rate of 48%. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that vinorelbine in this combination and on this schedule is cleared 1.5 to two times faster than in single-agent once-weekly studies. CONCLUSION: Myelosuppression is the DLT of this regimen with no major subjective toxicities. With tolerable toxicity and an encouraging 1-year survival rate of 48%, further investigation of this new vinorelbine schedule is warranted in this and other combination regimens.

Modulation of vinblastine resistance in metastatic renal cell carcinoma with cyclosporine A or tamoxifen: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

Multidrug resistance mediated by P-glycoprotein may be an important cause of chemotherapy failure. Renal cell carcinoma is a disease known to demonstrate a high degree of intrinsic chemotherapy drug resistance, and this has been shown to be related to intrinsic overexpression of P-glycoprotein. Cyclosporine A and tamoxifen have been shown to reverse multidrug resistance in renal cell carcinoma cell lines in vitro. Phase I studies have defined appropriate doses of cyclosporine A and tamoxifen that can be combined with continuous-infusion vinblastine and safely achieve serum levels associated in vitro with resistance reversal. A randomized Phase II study was carried out by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B to evaluate the potential of high doses of cyclosporine A or tamoxifen to modulate clinical vinblastine resistance in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Patients were treated initially with continuous-infusion vinblastine alone (1.2 mg/m2/day for 4 days or 1.5 mg/m2/day for 5 days); patients with stable or progressive disease were then treated with the same vinblastine regimen, combined with a high-dose regimen of either cyclosporine A (12.5 mg/kg/day for 5 days) or tamoxifen (400 mg/m2 as a loading dose and 300 mg/m2/day for 13 days). Sixty-three patients were randomized to each arm. Eighty patients on both arms were evaluable for response to vinblastine alone; of these, only one patient achieved a partial response. Thirty-three patients went on to be treated with vinblastine and high-dose cyclosporine A. No responses were observed, although four patients with progressive disease on prior vinblastine achieved stabilization of disease after cyclosporine A was added. Addition of cyclosporine resulted in more leukopenia (5% versus 25%) and in transient hyperbilirubinemia (24%) and neurocortical changes (11%). No significant azotemia was observed. Thirty-five patients received high-dose tamoxifen with continuous-infusion vinblastine. One complete remission was seen in a patient who had stable disease only with prior vinblastine alone; no other responses were observed. Leukopenia was not more severe with the addition of tamoxifen to vinblastine, nor was hyperbilirubinemia observed. However, 9% of patients developed transient ataxia with or without neurocortical changes as a result of high-dose tamoxifen therapy, and 11% developed phlebitis. We conclude that advanced renal cell carcinoma is a highly chemoresistant tumor, that continuous-infusion vinblastine has no appreciable activity in the therapy of this disease, and that addition of high doses of cyclosporine A or tamoxifen was not able to modulate this resistance in these patients. Suggestions regarding study design for future drug resistance modulation trials were made based on the design and conduct of this study.

Ifosfamide-based combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: two phase I studies.

Two studies were performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel and vinorelbine, respectively, in combination with a fixed dose of ifosfamide in previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer. Response rate and survival were also assessed. Both regimens were given with mesna and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. The maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel in combination with 1.6 g/m2/d X 3 ifosfamide was 300 mg/m2, and the recommended dose for phase II study is 250 mg/m2. Among 31 patients treated with ifosfamide/paclitaxel, there were seven partial responses; additionally, 10 patients had either minor regression or stable disease. The maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine in combination with 1.6 g/m2/d X 3 ifosfamide was 35 mg/m2/d X 3, and the recommended dose for phase II study is 30 mg/m2/d X 3. Among 42 patients treated with ifosfamide/vinorelbine, responses have been encouraging, and final analysis is pending. The dose-limiting toxicity for both regimens was neutropenia. These findings indicate that ifosfamide-containing combination chemotherapy regimens have activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer and are well tolerated when administered with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Preliminary report on a phase I study of ifosfamide and vinorelbine (navelbine) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Vinorelbine (Navelbine; Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC; Pierre Fabre Medicament, Paris, France), a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, and ifosfamide have each shown activity as a single agent and in various combination-chemotherapy regimens against non-small cell lung cancer. Vinorelbine usually has been given on a once-weekly schedule. We designed a phase I study adding escalating doses of vinorelbine on a novel schedule of 3 consecutive days to ifosfamide in a dose-intensive regimen with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The goals were to define the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine and to document the toxicity profile and the overall response and survival rates observed. Eligibility criteria included histologically or cytologically documented stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, measurable or evaluable disease, and no prior chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of escalating doses of vinorelbine (starting at 15 mg/m2) on days 1, 2, and 3 and ifosfamide at 2 g/m2 and decreased to 1.6 g/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered subcutaneously at 5 micrograms/kg on days 5 through 11 in all patients. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Forty-two patients were treated. The median age was 58 years (age range, 34 to 75 years); 41 patients had a performance status of 0 or 1. Dose-limiting neutropenia was observed in two of three patients at the initial dose level of ifosfamide 2 g/m2 and vinorelbine 15 mg/m2. Ifosfamide was therefore decreased to 1.6 g/m2, and vinorelbine was subsequently escalated, with a maximum administered dose of 35 mg/m2. The recommended phase II dose was ifosfamide 1.6 g/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3 with vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3, given with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support, on a 21-day cycle. At the recommended phase II dose myelosuppression remained the most common toxic effect, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia of brief duration occurring in 20 patients. Final analysis has not yet been completed, but responses have been observed at several dose levels. The maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine given on days 1, 2, and 3 is 30 mg/m2 when given with ifosfamide at 1.6 g/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Myelosuppression is the dose-limiting toxic effect. Future analyses of the data will report the overall response and survival rates in these patients.

Ifosfamide plus paclitaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: Ifosfamide and paclitaxel are active drugs in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer. We have performed a phase I study using a fixed dose of ifosfamide with escalating doses of paclitaxel, with G-CSF support, in an effort to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel in this combination, and to describe the dose-limiting toxicities of the combination at the recommended phase II dose of paclitaxel. We also studied the feasibility of delivering the paclitaxel as a one-hour infusion at the recommended phase II dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients were treated, 25 with stage IV disease, and 6 with stage IIIB disease. Ifosfamide was administered at a dose of 1.6 g/m2 i.v. bolus daily x 3 days, with mesna uroprotection. Paclitaxel was administered as a 24-hour infusion at dose levels of 135, 170, 200, 250, and 300 mg/m2; six patients were treated with a one-hour infusion, at a dose of 250 mg/m2. G-CSF, 5 micrograms/kg, was administered subcutaneously on days 4 through 10, or until the absolute neutrophil count exceeded 4000/microliters. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicity was granulocytopenia, which increased with increasing dose levels of paclitaxel. The MTD was 300 mg/m2 of paclitaxel, and the recommended phase II dose 250 mg/m2 administered as a 24-hour infusion. Other toxicities were generally mild, with only 5 patients demonstrating grade 3 neurotoxicity and 5 with grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Partial responses were seen in seven patients (23%), all in the 18 patients who received dose levels of 250 mg/m2 or higher. CONCLUSIONS: Ifosfamide plus paclitaxel is an active treatment regimen in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, and compares favorably with the results of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A phase II study is in progress by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, in an effort to better characterize the tolerance of the regimen, as well as its effect on tumor response and survival.

Lovastatin effects on human breast carcinoma cells. Differential toxicity of an adriamycin-resistant derivative and influence on selenocysteine tRNAS.

Selenocysteine tRNA[Ser]Sec isoacceptors contain the modified nucleotide i6A immediately 3' to the anticodon. Because synthesis of i6A is expected to be inhibited by lovastatin, the status of tRNA[Ser]Sec isoacceptors was examined in human breast carcinoma cells. As part of the initial characterization of these cells, it was determined that an adriamycin resistant derivative of the MCF-7 cell line exhibited a dramatic increase in the sensitivity to the killing effects of lovastatin relative to the parental MCF-7 cells. When MCF-7Adr cells were incubated with high levels of lovastatin, there was a dramatic perturbation in the distribution of isoacceptors within the selenocysteine tRNA population. Lovastatin may therefore be a useful reagent for both the study of differential killing of drug-resistant tumor cells and selenoprotein biosynthesis.

A phase I-phase II study of vinorelbine with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (PFL) has been reported to have a 29% response rate in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Vinorelbine, a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid, has also been reported to have single-agent activity in this disease. We designed a phase I-II study in which escalating doses of vinorelbine were added to PFL to define the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine, and to determine the response rate and survival at the recommended phase II dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study enrolled patients between December 1991 and August 1993. Eligibility criteria included histologically or cytologically documented stage III or IV non-small cell lung cancer, measurable or evaluable disease, and no prior chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of escalating doses of vinorelbine (starting at 20 mg/m2) on days 1 and 6, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 2, and 5-fluorouracil as a continuous infusion at 800 mg/m2/day for 4 days (days 2-5) with leucovorin 100 mg orally every 4 hours on days 1 through 5. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Forty patients were treated during the study. The median age of the patients was 58 (range, 33-75) and 36 patients had a performance status of 0 or 1. Dose-limiting neutropenia was observed in both patients treated with vinorelbine at 25 mg/m2. At the recommended phase II vinorelbine dose of 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 6, myelosuppression remained the most common toxicity, with 22 patients (55%) having grade 4 neutropenia. Fifteen patients (38%) required hospital admission for neutropenic fever; two died of neutropenic sepsis. Of 33 patients evaluated, 2 patients achieved a complete response and 10 patients achieved a partial response (overall response rate, 30%; 36% of the evaluated patients). Median survival was 10.4 months for the entire cohort (16.4 months for those with stage III disease and 9.6 months for patients with stage IV disease) and 1-year survival was 45%. The overall median time to progression was 8.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine given on days 1 and 6 with PFL is 20 mg/m2; myelosuppression is the dose-limited factor. The response rate is similar to rates observed in prior studies of combination chemotherapy, but the median survival of patients with stage IV disease exceeds that of many other regimens.

Paclitaxel and ifosfamide: a multicenter phase I study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Both paclitaxel and ifosfamide have significant single-agent activity in non-small cell lung cancer. We designed a phase I study combining escalating doses of paclitaxel, administered by 24-hour infusion, with ifosfamide given at a dose of 1.6 g/m2 daily x 3. Paclitaxel dose levels were 135, 170, 200, 250, and 300 mg/m2. The goal of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities of paclitaxel when used in this combination. Dose escalation was possible because of the use of filgrastim, a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Twenty-five patients at three institutions were treated. The dose-limiting toxicity of the combination was granulocytopenia, with other toxicities being generally mild to moderate. The maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel was 300 mg/m2, and the recommended phase II dose is 250 mg/m2. There was a suggestion of a dose-response curve with paclitaxel as all three partial responses were seen at the 250 mg/m2 dose level. An additional II patients had objective regression or stable disease lasting for 9 to 30 weeks. A phase II study of this combination is currently being planned by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

High-dose intravenous melphalan: a review.

PURPOSE: To review the clinical pharmacology and clinical trials that have used intravenous (IV) high-dose melphalan (HDM). METHODS: We reviewed the mechanism of action, clinical pharmacology, and clinical studies of HDM with and without autologous bone marrow support (ABMT) or peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) in the following disease areas: myeloma, ovarian cancer, malignant lymphoma, breast cancer, neuroblastoma, Ewing's sarcoma, and acute leukemia. RESULTS: HDM has a distribution half-life (t1/2 alpha) of 5 to 15 minutes and an elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) of 17 to 75 minutes at doses of 140 to 180 mg/m2, with significant intrapatient variability. At these doses, a wide range of areas under the concentration/time curve (AUC) have been reported, ie, 146 to 1,515 mg/min/mL. HDM has significant clinical activity in patients with multiple myeloma in relapse or when used as consolidative therapy in relapsed ovarian cancer, relapsed Hodgkin's disease, breast cancer, and relapsed neuroblastoma. Additional studies are required to determine the activity of HDM in Ewing's sarcoma or acute leukemia. Toxicities of HDM include myelosuppression, moderate nausea and vomiting, moderate to severe mucositis and diarrhea, and, infrequently, hepatic venoocclusive disease. CONCLUSION: HDM has become an established and effective salvage regimen for children with relapsed neuroblastoma, as well as an effective consolidative treatment for children with high-risk disease (stage IV). HDM is emerging as an active and effective mode of treatment in patients with stage II and III myeloma. The favorable toxicity profile of HDM and the availability of PBPCs allows for repetitive therapy.

Dose intensification--a phase I study of ifosfamide with vinorelbine (Navelbine): rationale and study design in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

A phase I trial of a combination of vinorelbine (Navelbine; Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Paris, France) and ifosfamide given on a novel schedule on 3 consecutive days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was conducted to establish the maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine and the dose-limiting toxicities of this regimen. Doses of vinorelbine were escalated in cohorts of patients. Of the 29 patients enrolled at the time of data analysis, 26 were evaluable for toxicity. At the first dose level (ifosfamide 2.0 g/m2 days 1, 2, and 3; vinorelbine 15 mg/m2 days 1, 2, and 3), two of three patients had dose-limiting toxicities. The dose of ifosfamide was decreased by 20%, and dose escalation of vinorelbine was restarted. At the vinorelbine dose level of 35 mg/m2/d for 3 days, three of four patients had dose-limiting toxicities. The recommended phase II doses were established as 1.6 g/m2/d ifosfamide for 3 days and 30 mg/m2/d vinorelbine for 3 days. This study established that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was needed for approximately 8 days. We are currently examining the feasibility of two dose levels of vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 and 30 mg/m2/d for 3 days) in combination with ifosfamide (1.6 g/m2/d) given every 2 weeks.

A phase I study of ifosfamide and doxorubicin with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in stage IV breast cancer.

Our objective was to define the maximum tolerated dose of an escalating dose of ifosfamide in combination with a fixed dose of doxorubicin supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Neupogen). Eighteen women with stage IV breast cancer were enrolled in a Phase I study of an escalating dose of ifosfamide (1.2 g/m2/day for 5 days-2.75 g/m2/day for 5 days) with doxorubicin 20 mg/m2/day for 3 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used at 5 microgram/kg on day 6 until hematological recovery. Prophylactic antibiotics were also used. The maximum tolerated dose of ifosfamide in combination with doxorubicin was 2.75 g/m2/day for 5 days. The objective response rate was 83% with a complete response rate of 33% (6/18 patients); the median time to treatment failure was 11.5 months. The median survival has not been reached and will exceed 18 months. We concluded that the recommended dose of ifosfamide in combination with doxorubicin is 2.5 g/m2/day for 5 days. This combination shows promise in stage IV breast cancer.

A phase II study of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin augmented by vinorelbine (Navelbine) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: rationale and study design.

In a randomized phase II study by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, the cisplatin/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (PFL) combination produced a 29% response rate in advanced, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. Vinorelbine (Navelbine; Burroughs Wellcome, Co, Research Triangle Park, NC; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Paris, France), a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, has also demonstrated single-agent activity in this disease. Therefore, a phase I-II study was designed to investigate the addition of vinorelbine in escalating doses to the PFL combination. The objectives of this study were to establish the maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine in combination with PFL, and to define the overall response rate in a cohort of patients treated with the maximum tolerated dose. The regimen consisted of vinorelbine in escalating doses starting at 20 mg/m2/d intravenously on days 1 and 5, followed by leucovorin 100 mg orally every 4 hours on days 1 to 5,5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2/d intravenous continuous infusion days 2 to 5 (96 hours), and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously 12 to 24 hours after administration of the first dose of vinorelbine. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the first five patients treated with the initial vinorelbine dose. Increasing the dose of vinorelbine to 25 mg/m2 in a second cohort of two patients, however, resulted in grade 4 granulocytopenia in both, and grade 4 diarrhea in one. It was concluded that this dose level was not feasible. During a preliminary analysis, one complete response and three partial responses were observed in 16 patients evaluated; one of these patients had a pathologic complete remission. This early analysis indicates activity for the regimen.