The relationship between social determinants of health and utilization of tertiary rhinology care.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has a high prevalence and significant cost and quality of life implications. Many types of practitioners care for patients with rhinosinusitis; however, patients with chronic or complicated conditions are often referred for tertiary rhinology services. It is unclear how social determinants of health affect access and utilization of these services. A better understanding of social barriers to tertiary rhinology care is needed to reduce health care disparities and improve health outcomes. The aim of the present study was to measure whether income, insurance status, race, and education affect utilization of tertiary rhinology care. METHODS: All adult patients diagnosed with CRS by rhinologists at a single tertiary care hospital were identified (2010-2014). Patient characteristics (age, gender, race, insurance status) were compared with population-level data from the hospital and from Davidson County, Tennessee, which includes Nashville. Rhinology utilization rates were calculated for each ZIP code within the county. The association between determinants of health (race, insurance status, education, median income) and tertiary rhinology utilization were measured by using multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1341 unique patients with CRS (median age, 50 years; 55% women, 80% white, 82% with private insurance) from Davidson County used tertiary rhinology services. These patients were significantly older and more likely to be female, white, and privately insured than patients seen hospital-wide or among the population of Davidson County (p < 0.001). Utilization rates were higher in ZIP codes with a lower proportion of minorities, a higher median income, and higher rates of private insurance and college education. However, in adjusted analysis, only attainment of a college education was independently associated with utilization of tertiary rhinology services. Utilization was 4% higher for every 1% increase in college-educated population (coefficient 0.04 [95% CI, 0.01-0.07]; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Results of this study indicated that some social determinants of health (race, income, educational level, insurance status) do affect utilization of tertiary rhinology services. Higher utilization among those with higher income and educational attainment are contradictory to the data, which indicated that lower socioeconomic status was associated with a higher CRS rate. Further study is required to understand the disparities in rhinology utilization rates.

Influence of timing, radiation, and reconstruction on complications and speech outcomes with tracheoesophageal puncture.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the impact of radiation, reconstruction, and timing of tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) on complications and speech outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review identified 145 patients who underwent TEP between 2003 and 2007. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (68%) had primary and 46 (32%) had secondary TEP, with complications occurring in 65% and 61%, respectively (p = .96). Twenty-nine patients (20%) had major complications (18 primary and 11 secondary; p = .42). Ninety-four patients (65%) had pre-TEP radiation, 39 (27%) post-TEP radiation, and 12 (8%) no radiation. With patients grouped by TEP timing and radiation history, there was no difference in complications, fluency, or TEP use. With mean 4.7-year follow-up, 82% primary and 85% secondary used TEP for primary communication (p = .66). Free-flap patients used TEP more commonly for primary communication after secondary versus primary TEP (90% vs 50%; p = .02). CONCLUSION: Primary and secondary tracheoesophageal speakers experience similar high rates of complications. Extent of pharyngeal reconstruction, rather than radiation, may be more important in selection of TEP timing. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1765-1771, 2016.