ABSTRACT
Persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD) after treatment for myeloma predicts inferior outcomes, but within MRD-positive patients there is great heterogeneity with both early and very late relapses. Among different MRD techniques, flow cytometry provides additional information about antigen expression on tumor cells, which could potentially contribute to stratify MRD-positive patients. We investigated the prognostic value of those antigens required to monitor MRD in 1265 newly diagnosed patients enrolled in the GEM2000, GEM2005MENOS65, GEM2005MAS65 and GEM2010MAS65 protocols. Overall, CD19pos, CD27neg, CD38lo, CD45pos, CD81pos, CD117neg and CD138lo expression predicted inferior outcomes. Through principal component analysis, we found that simultaneous CD38lowCD81posCD117neg expression emerged as the most powerful combination with independent prognostic value for progression-free survival (HR:1.69; P=0.002). This unique phenotypic profile retained prognostic value among MRD-positive patients. We then used next-generation flow to determine antigen stability throughout the course of the disease, and found that the expression of antigens required to monitor MRD is mostly stable from diagnosis to MRD stages, except for CD81 whose expression progressively increased from baseline to chemoresistant tumor cells (14 vs 28%). Altogether, we showed that the phenotypic profile of tumor cells provides additional prognostic information, and could be used to further predict risk of relapse among MRD-positive patients.
Subject(s)
Antigens, CD/metabolism , Multiple Myeloma/metabolism , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/metabolism , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm, Residual/metabolism , Neoplasm, Residual/pathology , PrognosisABSTRACT
Los agentes estimulantes del Receptor de la Eritropoyetina (AREs) se usan en el tratamiento de la anemia de hemopatías malignas (HM). Sin embargo, la tasa de respuestas es variable por diversos factores como el déficit funcional de hierro (DFF). El nivel de hemoglobina (Hb) reticulocitaria es un parámetro fácil de obtener que ha mostrado su utilidad en el diagnóstico del DFF. El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar qué pacientes con HM tratados con AREs presentan DFF y si la Hb reticulocitaria predice la respuesta hemoglobínica en estos enfermos. Se incluyeron 42 pacientes con diagnostico de Mieloma Múltiple (n=17), Linfoma no Hodgkin (n=14), Linfoma de Hodgkin (n=3), Leucemia Linfática Crónica (n=4), Síndrome Mielodisplásico (n=2), Leucemia Linfoblástica Aguda (n=1) y Leucemia Mieloblástica Aguda (n=1). Veinticinco fueron tratados con Epoetina-beta, diez y seis con Darbepoetina y uno con Epoetina alfa.La respuesta fue favorable en el 28%, 53% y 58% de lospacientes a las 3, 6 y 12 semanas de tratamiento, respectivamente. Se detectó DFF en el 17% de los pacientes. En cuanto a la respuesta, no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los pacientes con y sin DFF, si bien, a mitad de tratamiento, fue ligeramente superior en el grupo sin DFF (57% vs 43%, p>0.05). El nivel basal de Hb reticulocitaria se correlacionó con el grado de respuesta global a las 12 semanas de finalizar el tratamiento. Así, el 79% de los pacientes respondedores tenían una Hb reticulocitaria inicial >36·5 pg, mientras que este porcentaje bajó al 30% en los no respondedores (p = 0.024)En resumen, la Hb reticulocitaria es un método sensible ypreciso para detectar DFF en pacientes con HM bajo tratamiento con AREs. Además, un nivel elevado de Hb reticulocitaria basal es un parámetro que se asocia con respuesta favorable al tratamiento
The Erythropoietin-Receptor stimulating Agents (ERAs) areindicated in the supportive treatment of the anemia in hematological malignancies (HM). However, the response rate is variable due to factors such as the functional iron deficiency (FID). The level of the reticulocyte hemoglobin (RHb) is an easy-to-obtain parameter very useful for the diagnostic of the FID.The purpose of this study was to evaluate which patientswith HM treated with ERAs present FID. In addition, wetried to asses if the level of RH predicts the response in these patients.We included 42 patients with the following diagnostics:Multiple Myeloma (n= 17), Non Hodgkin Lymphoma(n=14), Hodgkin Lymphoma (n=3), Chronic lymphocyticLeukemia (n=4), Myelodisplastic syndrome (n=2), Acutelymphoblastic Leukemia (n=1), and Acute mieloblasticLeuKemia (n=1). Twenty five of them were treated withEpoetin beta, sixteen with darbepoetin alfa and one withEpoetin alfa at standard doses. The response was favorable in 28%, 53% and 58% of patients at the third, sixth and twelfth week of the treatment, respectively. FID was detected in 17% of the patients. Theresponse rate was not statistical significant different between patients with and without FID, although it was slightly superior in the group without FID (57% vs. 43%, p>0.05). Seventy nine percent of patients with a favorable response at twelve weeks showed an initial RH >36·5 pg, while this percentage was only 30% in patients who did not respond (p=0.024).In conclusion, RH is a sensitive and specific method to detect FID in patients with HM who are treated with ERAs.Furthermore, the high level of RH at the baseline is a predictor of favorable response of treatment, in these patients
