Identifying Workflow Disruptions in Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery: Elucidating Challenges Experienced by Surgical Teams.

PURPOSE: Bariatric surgery is an effective and durable treatment for weight loss for patients with extreme obesity. Although traditionally approached laparoscopically, robotic bariatric surgery (RBS) has unique benefits for both surgeons and patients. Nonetheless, the technological complexity of robotic surgery presents new challenges for OR teams and the wider clinical system. Further assessment of the role of RBS in delivering quality care for patients with obesity is necessary and can be done through a human factors approach. This observational study sought to investigate the impact of RBS on the surgical work system via the study of flow disruptions (FDs), or deviations from the natural workflow progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RBS procedures were observed between October 2019 and March 2022. FDs were recorded in real time and subsequently classified into one of nine work system categories. Coordination FDs were further classified into additional sub-categories. RESULTS: Twenty-nine RBS procedures were observed at three sites. An average FD rate of 25.05 (CI = ± 2.77) was observed overall. FDs were highest between insufflation and robot docking (M = 29.37, CI = ± 4.01) and between patient closing and wheels out (M = 30.00, CI = ± 6.03). FD rates due to coordination issues were highest overall, occurring once every 4 min during docking (M = 14.28, CI = ± 3.11). CONCLUSION: FDs occur roughly once every 2.4 min and happen most frequently during the final patient transfer and robot docking phases of RBS. Coordination challenges associated with waiting for staff/instruments not readily available and readjusting equipment contributed most to these disruptions.

A novel description of converting a gastric plication to sleeve gastrectomy for weight loss: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery is a rapidly growing field with trends and standards of care changing more rapidly than most. Gastric plication was once an exciting novel procedure which showed promise, however it has fallen out of favor for other procedures such as the sleeve gastrectomy. Existing literature on the surgical conversion of a gastric plication to a sleeve gastrectomy does not provide specific details on the operative technique of this rarely encountered operation. CASE REPORT: In this case report we describe a morbidly obese female who presented weight gain after laparoscopic gastric plication and gastric banding. We provide the operative technique involved in conversion to a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. CONCLUSION: This case provides specific operative technique with detailed media for the conversion of gastric plication to LSG.

Is there a benefit to preoperative weight loss in gastric bypass patients? A prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery is the leading surgical treatment of morbid obesity in the United States. The role of preoperative weight loss in gastric bypass surgery remains controversial. We performed a prospective randomized trial to determine whether preoperative weight loss results in better outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass. METHODS: A total of 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery from May 2004 to October 2005 were randomized preoperatively to either a weight loss group with a 10% weight loss requirement or a group that had no weight loss requirements. The patients were followed prospectively. The variables analyzed included perioperative complications, operative time, postoperative weight loss, and resolution of co-morbidities. RESULTS: Data were available for 26 patients in the weight loss group and 35 in the nonweight loss group. The 2 groups had similar preoperative characteristics, conversion and complication rates, and resolution of co-morbidities. The initial body mass index was 48.7 kg/m(2) and 49.3 kg/m(2) for the weight loss group and nonweight loss group, respectively (P = NS). The preoperative body mass index was 44.5 kg/m(2) and 50.7 kg/m(2) for the weight loss group and nonweight loss group, respectively (P = 0.0027). The operative time was 220.2 and 257.6 minutes for the 2 groups (P = 0.0084). The percentage of excess weight loss at 3 and 6 months for the weight loss group and nonweight loss group was 44.1% and 33.1% (P = 0.0267) and 53.9% and 50.9% (P = NS), respectively. The interval to surgery from the initial consultation was 5.4 months and 5.2 months for the 2 groups (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative weight loss before laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was associated with a decrease in the operating room time and an improved percentage of excess weight loss in the short term. Preoperative weight loss, however, did not affect the major complication or conversion rates, and its long-term effects were not apparent through this study. Also, preoperative weight loss did not have any bearing on the resolution of co-morbidities.

Postural ergonomics during robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a pilot project.

We hypothesized that a laparoscopic technique for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery is associated with more musculoskeletal discomfort and ergonomic strain than a robotic technique. This pilot project studied one surgeon while he performed four laparoscopic and four robotic (da Vinci system) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures. We measured musculoskeletal discomfort with body part discomfort score (BPD) and ergonomic positioning with the rapid upper-limb assessment tool (RULA). At the end of the case, the robotic cases were associated with more discomfort in the neck (median BPD scores 2.5 versus 1.0, P = 0.028), while the laparoscopic cases were associated with more discomfort in the upper back (median BPD scores 2.0 versus 1.0, P = 0.028). Both the right and left shoulders demonstrated more discomfort with the laparoscopic group (median BPD scores 3.0 versus 1.5, P = 0.057). The RULA analysis demonstrated that the upper arm (1.0 versus 2.25), lower arm (1.125 versus 2.125), wrist (2.5 versus 3.5) and wrist twist (1.25 versus 2) were held in less ergonomically correct positioning (higher score) in the laparoscopic group compared to the robotic group (P = 0.029). In contrast, the trunk (1.5 versus 1.0) had a worse RULA score in the robotic group compared to the laparoscopic cases. These pilot data suggest that robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery may result in less musculoskeletal stress to the upper extremities than standard laparoscopic technique. In contrast, robotic surgery seems to offer both postural advantages and disadvantages for the neck and back region. More-detailed studies are needed to fully assess the potential postural advantages of robotic surgical techniques over standard laparoscopy.

Totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass: results from 75 patients.

BACKGROUND: A technique for Totally Robotic Laparoscopic Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass (TRL-RYGBP) has been reported previously. In this paper, we report our experience with our first 75 TRLRYGBP operations, including the training of three laparoscopic fellows. We describe changes in technique that have evolved with more experience, lessons learned, and the results from a larger series. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of the first 75 TRLRYGBP procedures performed at our institution using the da Vinci surgical robot. We recorded demographics including patient age, gender, preoperative BMI, and numbers of NIH-defined co-morbidities. Data were collected on operative time, length of stay, complications, and postoperative weight loss. Results were compared between the three fellows to examine learning curves. RESULTS: The average patient age was 44 years (23-61), average BMI was 46.1 kg/m(2) (34.3-65.5), and the median number of NIH defined co-morbidities was 1 (0-3). Median operative time was 140 minutes (80-312) with mean operative time per BMI of 3.1 minutes (1.6-5.7). Excess weight loss was 48% at 3 months, 64% at 6 months, and 82% at 1 year. The overall complication rate was 22.6% (5.3% intraoperative, 8.0% major, and 9.3% minor including a 2.9% stricture rate and 0% leak rate). Each fellow demonstrated a learning curve of 10-15 cases. CONCLUSION: The authors' continued experience with the TRLRYGBP has confirmed our early results that the use of the da Vinci robot for laparoscopic gastric bypass is a superior alternative to the standard laparoscopic RYGBP, and that the learning curve is significantly faster.

Orogastric tube complications in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Recent national efforts have focused on improving patient safety in surgical procedures including examining adverse events. An adverse event in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) which has not received much scrutiny involves orogastric tube complications during gastric pouch formation. METHODS: Retrospective review was conducted of all LRYGBPs (n=727) performed by 5 surgeons over 5 years at 2 institutions. Cases with intraoperative orogastric tube (OGT) related complications (n=9) were identified. RESULTS: 9 patients (1.2%) had preventable orogastric tube-related complications. Mean patient demographics were as follows: age 47 years, female 56%, pre-op BMI 52 kg/m(2), co-morbidities 3.5 and mortality 0%. 7 of 9 patients' cases were complicated by stapling of an orogastric tube during gastric pouch formation. The remaining 2 patients had complications involving suturing of the Levacuator tube during gastrojejunostomy formation. All complications required gastric pouch or anastomotic revision. 2 patients required conversion to an open procedure, 2 required re-operation for anastomotic leak, and 1 had respiratory failure and prolonged hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Orogastric tube complications can occur during laparoscopic RYGBP, but are seldom reported and can be associated with significant morbidity. Treatment options are dependent upon the situation. More importantly, prevention strategies must include constant communication with the anesthesiologist and removal or manipulation of an OGT prior to stapling or suturing, use of large bore OGTs for increased visual or tactile recognition, retraction of the OGT proximal to the anastomosis during gastrojejunal construction and employing alternatives to esophageal temperature probes (i.e. Foley temperature probes).

Incidental finding of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) during laparoscopic gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare tumors, accounting for <1% of all neoplasms of the alimentary tract. GISTs have not been previously reported in association with gastric bypass surgery. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 517 consecutive morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) between January 2002 and August 2005. Incidental intraoperative findings of gastric GIST were recorded. RESULTS: 4 patients (0.8%) were noted to have GISTs intra-operatively upon inspection of the stomach prior to partition. All GISTs were identified along the anterior aspect of the upper third of the stomach and were removed by laparoscopic wedge excision with at least a 1 cm margin. The 4 tumors were <1 cm in size and all had immunohistochemical analysis positive for CD117 (c-kit). None of the tumors had determinants of malignant behavior (high mitotic rate, necrosis or pleomorphism). CONCLUSION: We have found a 0.8% incidence of gastric GISTs in our morbidly obese patients undergoing LRYGBP. All of these small, benign tumors were found incidentally in asymptomatic patients. This case series underscores the need to fully assess the stomach prior to gastric pouch formation. Without the ability to grossly determine the benign or malignant behavior of GISTs, all these tumors found incidentally should be resected with adequate margins.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at a Veterans Affairs and high-volume academic facilities: a comparison of institutional outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of bariatric surgery have been linked to institutional case volume. The objective of our study was to compare outcome of laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB) in 2 settings: a low-volume Veterans Affairs (VA) and a high-volume university hospital (UH). METHODS: Over a period of 27 months, 140 patients underwent RYGB (137 laparoscopic, 3 open) performed by 1 surgeon. Fifty-five were performed at a VA and 85 at a UH with an annual caseload close to 300. RESULTS: The body mass index in both groups was similar, but patients at the VA were older, mostly men, and more likely to have hypertension (HTN), obstructive sleep apnea, and diabetes mellitus (DM). Operative and anesthesia times were significantly longer at the VA. There were no differences in 30-day mortality (none), major morbidity, conversion rates, or reoperation rates. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic RYGB can be performed safely at a VA facility despite a higher risk population and low annual volume.

Magnetic resonance imaging is not needed to clear cervical spines in blunt trauma patients with normal computed tomographic results and no motor deficits.

HYPOTHESIS: Trauma patients with normal motor examination results and normal cervical spine helical computed tomographic (CT) scans with sagittal reconstructions do not have significant cervical spine injury. DESIGN: Prospectively collected registry data. SETTING: Level II community-based trauma center. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the trauma service from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Injury detected by CT and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine. Neurologic examination and need for surgery were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 2854 trauma patients were admitted, of whom 91.2% had blunt trauma. Of these patients, 56.2% had a closed head injury. One hundred patients had cervical spine and/or spinal cord injuries. Eighty-five patients had a cervical spine injury diagnosed by CT. Fifteen patients had admission neurologic deficits not seen on CT, and 7 of these patients had non-bony abnormalities on MRI. Ninety-three patients had a normal admission motor examination result, a CT result negative for trauma, and persistent cervical spine pain, and were examined with MRI. All MRI examination results were negative for clinically significant injury. Seventeen patients had MRIs that showed degenerative disc disease, and 6 had spinal canal stenosis secondary to ossification. Twelve comatose patients (Glasgow Coma Scale score, <9), moving all 4 extremities on arrival, with normal CT results of the cervical spine, were examined with MRI. All of these MRI examination results were negative for injury. None of the patients experienced neurologic deterioration. No patient required operative management of spinal injury. CONCLUSION: Blunt trauma patients with normal motor examination results and normal CT results of the cervical spine do not require further radiologic examination before clearing the cervical spine.

Cervical spine clearance in blunt trauma: evaluation of a computed tomography-based protocol.

BACKGROUND: Prompt identification of cervical spine injuries has been a critical issue in trauma management. In 1998, the authors developed a new protocol to evaluate cervical spines in blunt trauma. This protocol relies on clinical clearance for appropriate patients and helical computed tomography instead of plain radiographs for patients who cannot be clinically cleared. The authors then prospectively collected data on all cervical spine evaluations to assess the sensitivity and specificity of their approach. METHODS: Any patient without clinical evidence of neurologic injury, alcohol or drug intoxication, or distracting injury underwent cervical spine evaluation by clinical examination. Patients who did not meet these criteria underwent helical computed tomographic scanning of the entire cervical spine. For patients who had neurologic deficits, a magnetic resonance image was obtained. If the patient was not evaluable secondary to coma, the computed tomographic scan was without abnormality, and the patient was moving all four extremities at arrival in the emergency department, the cervical spine was cleared, and spinal precautions were removed. Data were collected for all patients admitted to Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital trauma service between 1999 and 2002. The authors selected for analysis patients with blunt trauma and further identified those with closed head injuries (Glasgow Coma Scale score < 15 and loss of consciousness). In addition, all blunt cervical spine injuries were reviewed. RESULTS: During the period of study, 2,854 trauma patients were admitted, of whom 2,603 (91%) had blunt trauma. Of these, 1,462 (56%) had closed head injuries. One hundred patients (7% of patients admitted for blunt trauma) had cervical spine or spinal cord injuries, of which 99 were identified by the authors' protocol. Only one injury was not appreciated in a patient with syringomyelia. Fifteen percent of patients with spinal cord injury had no radiographic abnormality; all of these patients presented with neurologic deficits. The sensitivity for detecting cervical spine injury was thus 99%, and the specificity was 100%. The risk of missing a cervical spine injury in these blunt trauma patients was 0.04%. The authors missed no spine injuries in patients with head injuries. CONCLUSION: The use of the authors' protocol resulted in excellent sensitivity and specificity in detecting cervical spine injuries. In addition, it allowed early removal of spinal precautions.

Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastric bypass is a technically demanding operation, especially when hand-sewing is required. Robotics may help facilitate the performance of this difficult operation. This study was undertaken to compare a single surgeon's results using the daVinci Surgical System with those using traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) when the techniques were learned simultaneously. METHODS: From July 2004 to April 2005, the new laparoscopic fellow's first 50 patients were randomized to undergo either LRYGB or totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (TRRYGB). Data were collected on patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities, operative time, complication rates, and length of stay. Student's t test with unequal variances was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: No significant differences in age, gender, co-morbidities, complication rates, or length of stay were found between the two groups. The mean operating time was significantly shorter for TRRYGB than for LRYGB (130.8 versus 149.4 minutes; P = 0.02), with a significant difference in minutes per BMI (2.94 versus 3.47 min/BMI; P = 0.02). The largest difference was in patients with a BMI >43 kg/m(2), for whom the difference in procedure time was 29.6 minutes (123.5 minutes for TRRYGB versus 153.2 minutes for LRYGB; P = 0.009) and a significant difference in minutes per BMI (2.49 versus 3.24 min/BMI; P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the use of the daVinci Surgical System for TRRYGB is safe and feasible. The operating room time is shorter with the use of the robotic system during a surgeon's learning curve, and that decrease is maximized in patients with a larger BMI. TRRYGB may be a better approach to gastric bypass when hand-sewing is required, especially early in a surgeon's experience.

Local anesthetic infusion pumps improve postoperative pain after inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial.

Pain after an open inguinal hernia repair may be significant. In fact, some surgeons feel that the pain after open repair justifies a laparoscopic approach. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of local anesthetic infusion pumps would reduce postoperative pain after open inguinal hernia repair. We performed a prospective, double-blind randomized study of 45 open plug and patch inguinal hernia repairs. Patients were randomized to receive either 0.25 per cent bupivicaine or saline solution via an elastomeric infusion pump (ON-Q) for 48 hours, at 2 cc/h. The catheters were placed in the subcutaneous tissue and removed on postoperative day 3. Both groups were prescribed hydrocodone to use in the postoperative period at the prescribed dosage as needed for pain. Interviews were conducted on postoperative days 3 and 7, and patient's questionnaires, including pain scores, amount of pain medicine used, and any complications, were collected accordingly. During the first 5 postoperative days, postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale. Twenty-three repairs were randomized to the bupivicaine group and 22 repairs randomized to the placebo group. In the bupivicaine group, there was a significant decrease in postoperative pain on postoperative days 2 through 5 with P values <0.05. This significant difference continued through postoperative day 5, 2 days after the infusion pumps were removed. Patients who had bupivicaine instilled in their infusion pump had statistically significant lower subjective pain scores on postoperative days 2 through 5. This significant difference continued even after the infusion pumps were removed. Local anesthetic infusion pumps significantly decreased the amount of early postoperative pain. Pain relief persisted for 2 days after catheter and pump removal.

Essential techniques for intraoperative composite endograft (CEG) formation in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

The development of an ideal aortic stent graft continues to progress. New devices and techniques are expanding the use of endovascular repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). We present data with intraoperative composite endograft (CEG) techniques evaluating immediate and short-term compatibility of components and patients outcome. Twenty-five of 66 patients (38%) received intraoperative CEGs for AAA treatment. A total of 50 components were used to treat type I endoleaks, prevent graft limb kinking or treat associated iliac aneurysm. Nine of the components were used to manage type I proximal endoleaks. Forty-one components were used at the iliac limb for distal type I endoleak, hostile iliac anatomy, or graft limb support or to treat an associated iliac aneurysm. Two patients were left with a type I endoleaks at the iliac attachment site on completion of graft placement. With a mean follow-up of 11 months. Two of 25 patients had a type II endoleak at 6 months. One patient had type I endoleak at 1 year follow-up. CEGs are essential to treat endoleaks with a high technical success rate and expand the indications for treating infrarenal AAA. The component's short-term compatibility makes this method of stent graft placement safe.