Risk Factors for Abnormal Cervical Cytology in Women Undergoing Kidney Transplant Evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: Cervical cytology screening has been successful in reducing deaths from cervical cancer. We sought to determine risk factors for abnormal Pap test results in women undergoing kidney transplant evaluation. MATERILAS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined women undergoing kidney transplant evaluations from 2008 to 2011. Patients were stratified based on normal cytology and atypical/malignant cytology. RESULTS: Of 404 patients, 293 patients (72.5%) had normal cytologic findings, whereas 111 (27.5%) had abnormal findings. On univariate logistic regression analyses, patients who had chronic kidney disease with an autoimmune cause (odds ratio = 2.71 [95% confidence interval, 1.41-5.19]; P = .003), previous renal transplants (odds ratio = 2.64 [95% confidence interval, 1.20-5.82], P = .016), or age ≤ 50 years (odds ratio = 1.68 [95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.61], P = .022) were more likely to have abnormal findings. Patients with normal and abnormal findings had similar rates of dialysis use. On multivariate logistic regression, patients who had chronic kidney disease with autoimmune causes (odds ratio = 2.48 [95% confidence interval, 1.26-4.88]; P = .008) and who had previous renal transplants (odds ratio = 2.67 [95% confidence interval, 1.20-5.95]; P = .017) were more likely to have abnormal findings. CONCLUSIONS: Previous kidney transplant, autoimmune disease, and age ≤ 50 years were associated with abnormalities on cervical cancer screening in our female group of patients. Patients with these characteristics may benefit more from routine cervical cancer screening than other patients evaluated for kidney transplant.

The Utility of Screening Colonoscopy During Kidney Transplant Evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: Transplant centers often recommend, but not necessarily require, screening colonoscopies for people over 50 years of age in accordance with the US Preventative Services Task Force guidelines for the general population. We sought to identify risk factors affecting colonoscopy results in renal failure patients undergoing kidney transplant evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined patients undergoing kidney transplant evaluation from 2009 to 2012 (n = 469 patients). Comparisons were made between colonoscopy reports categorized as normal (no finding or hyperplastic polyp) or abnormal (adenomatous polyp or carcinoma). RESULTS: Of 469 patients who met the study criteria, 303 (64.6%) had normal colonoscopies and 166 (35.4%) had abnormal colonoscopies. Logistic regression analysis showed that male sex (odds ratio = 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-3.20; P = .001) and increasing age (odds ratio = 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.08; P = .019) were more likely to correspond to abnormal findings. Those with dialysis vintage (length of time on dialysis) up to 3 years (odds ratio = 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-4.06; P = .027) and hypertension as the cause of renal failure (odds ratio = 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-2.87; P = .002) had more abnormal findings. No differences in length of evaluation, rate of being listed for transplant, and rate of transplant were shown. CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of adenomatous findings on colonoscopy was higher among patients with pretransplant end-stage renal disease than in the general population, as shown in other studies. Age, sex, dialysis vintage up to 3 years, and hypertensive renal failure were associated with adenomatous polyps of the colon in this study population. Because adenomatous polyp rates are high in patients with chronic kidney disease who are undergoing transplant evaluation and colonoscopic findings do not appear to delay transplant evaluations or listing rates, screening colonoscopies should be encouraged.

Utility of mammography for chronic kidney disease patients undergoing kidney transplant evaluation.

UNLABELLED: Transplant centers typically require screening mammography (MMG) for women ≥40 during evaluation. American Cancer Society recommends starting annual MMG at 40, while USPSTF recommends biennial MMG at 50. We sought to determine the effect of age and other breast malignancy risk factors on screening MMG in the pre-transplant renal failure population undergoing transplant evaluation. METHODS: We retrospectively examined women ≥40 undergoing kidney transplant evaluation from 2006 to 2012 (n = 541). RESULTS: Patients aged 40.0-49.9 and ≥50 had similar rates of breast biopsy and breast malignancy. African Americans underwent a higher rate of biopsies (OR 2.391, 95%CI 1.111-5.019, p = 0.026), with a lower rate of biopsy in those already on dialysis at presentation (OR 0.434, 95%CI 0.212-0.888, p = 0.022). Higher breast density (>50% fibroglandular tissue) increased both rate of biopsy (OR 2.876, 95%CI 1.377-6.010, p = 0.005) and malignancy (OR 5.061, 95%CI 1.012-25.315, p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: As we found no independent differences in biopsy or malignancy between age groups, it is reasonable for transplant centers to use the same evaluation MMG screening policy for all women ≥40. However, as malignancy risk increased with higher breast density, a lower threshold for additional workup may be warranted in patients with dense breasts or an indeterminate lesion on MMG.

Enhancing kidney function with thrombolytic therapy following donation after cardiac death: a multicenter quasi-blinded prospective randomized trial.

Kidneys from donors after cardiac death (DCD) are at risk for inferior outcomes, possibly due to microthrombi and additional warm ischemia. We describe an organ procurement organization-wide trial utilizing thrombolytic tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) during machine pulsatile perfusion (MPP). A kidney from each recovered kidney pair was prospectively randomized to receive tPA (50 mg Alteplase) or no tPA (control) in the MPP perfusate. From 2011 to 2013, 24 kidneys were placed with enrolled recipients from 19 DCD kidney donors. There were no significant differences for absolute values of flow or resistance while undergoing MPP between the groups, nor rates of achieving discrete flow and resistance targets. While there was a trend toward lower creatinine and higher glomerular filtration rates in the tPA group at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, these differences were not significant. Delayed graft function (DGF) rates were 41.7% in the tPA group vs. 58.4% in the control group (OR 0.51, 95%CI 0.10-2.59, p = 0.68). Death-censored graft survival was similar between the groups. In this pilot study, encouraging trends are seen in kidney allograft function independent of MPP parameters following DCD kidney transplantation for those kidneys receiving thrombolytic tPA and MPP, compared with standard MPP.

Outcome differences between young children and adolescents undergoing kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Although graft loss remains the biggest challenge for all pediatric kidney transplant (KT) recipients, unique challenges exist within different age groups. We aim to evaluate the different characteristics and graft survival outcomes of young children and adolescents undergoing KT. METHODS: Children who underwent isolated KT between 2000 and 2013 at our institution were included in this retrospective analysis. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared using student's t-test, chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of 73 children who underwent KT, 31 were <12 (young children), and 42 were ≥ 12 years old (adolescents). Overall patient survival was 100%. The younger group had superior 5-year (100% vs. 75.5%) and 10-year (94.4% vs. 43.8%) graft survival (p=0.008). Factors predictive of poor graft survival on multivariate analysis were older age at transplantation (HR 1.2, CI 1-1.4, p=0.047), female gender (HR 9.0, CI 1.9-43, p=0.006), and acute rejection episodes (HR 13, CI 2-90, p=0.008). The most common causes of graft loss were acute and chronic rejection episodes and immunosuppression nonadherence. CONCLUSION: Adolescents undergoing KT have inferior graft survival compared to younger children. In adjusted modeling, children with older age, female gender, and acute rejection episodes have inferior graft survival.

Transversus abdominis muscle release for repair of complex incisional hernias in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernias in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) can be complex because of adjacent bony structures, proximity of the allograft/transplant ureter, and context of immunosuppression. We hypothesized that our novel posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) and retromuscular mesh reinforcement offers a safe and durable repair. METHODS: KTRs with incisional hernias repaired using the aforementioned technique were identified within our prospective database (2007 to 2013) and analyzed. RESULTS: Eleven patients were identified (median age 49 years, body mass index 32). The median hernia size was 30 cm(2) (range 88 to 1,040 cm(2)) and 8 of the 11 patients were recurrent. Intraoperative morbidity consisted of one transplant ureter injury repaired primarily over a stent. Postoperative morbidity consisted of 2 superficial surgical site infections that resolved and 1 readmission for a blood transfusion. There were no instances of mesh infection, explantation, graft loss, or graft dysfunction. With a median follow-up of 12 months (range 3 to 69), 1 (9%) lateral recurrence has been documented. CONCLUSIONS: For complex incisional hernias in KTRs, TAR is associated with low perioperative morbidity and durable repair.

Fever, infection, and rejection after kidney transplant failure.

BACKGROUND: Patients returning to dialysis therapy after renal transplant failure have high morbidity and retransplant rates. After observing frequent hospitalizations with fever after failure, it was hypothesized that maintaining immunosuppression for the failed allograft increases the risk of infection, while weaning immunosuppression can lead to symptomatic rejection mimicking infection. METHODS: One hundred eighty-six patients with failed kidney transplants were analyzed for rates of hospitalization with fever within 6 months of allograft failure. Patients were stratified by the presence of full immunosuppression versus minimal (low-dose prednisone) or no immunosuppression, before hospital admission. Subsequent rates of documented infection and nephrectomy, as well as patient survival, were ascertained. RESULTS: Hospitalization with fever within 6 months of allograft failure was common, occurring in 44% of patients overall. However, among febrile hospitalized patients who had been weaned off of immunosuppression before admission, only 38% had documented infection. In contrast, 88% of patients maintained on immunosuppression had documented infection (P<0.001). In both groups, dialysis catheter-related infections were the most common infection source. Allograft nephrectomy was performed in 81% of hospitalized patients with no infection, compared to 30% of patients with documented infection (P<0.001). Mortality risk was significantly higher in patients with concurrent pancreas transplants or who were hospitalized with documented infection. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance immunosuppression after kidney allograft failure was associated with a greater incidence of infection, while weaning of immunosuppression commonly resulted in symptomatic rejection with fever mimicking infection on presentation. Management of the failed allograft should include planning to avoid both infection and sensitizing events.

Effects of cellular sensitization and donor age on acute rejection and graft function after deceased-donor kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Allografts from older donors may be more immunogenic than those from younger donors. Pretransplantation cellular sensitization may interact with advanced donor age to increase the risk of immune injury after deceased-donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: The outcomes of 118 consecutive deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients with available pretransplantation donor-stimulated enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assays for interferon gamma were analyzed retrospectively to determine the impact of cellular sensitization and other clinical variables, including donor age, on the incidence of acute rejection (AR) in the first year after deceased-donor transplantation and on estimated glomerular filtration rate 12 months after transplantation. RESULTS: The incidence of AR was higher in patients with positive pretransplantation ELISPOT assays versus those with negative assays (36% vs. 14%, P=0.009). Logistic regression indicated that the combination of donor age 50 years or older and a positive pretransplantation ELISPOT assay was more strongly associated with AR (odds ratio, 12.1; confidence interval, 1.1-133) than either variable alone. Estimated glomerular filtration 12 months after transplantation was highest in ELISPOT-negative patients receiving kidneys from donors younger than 50 years and lowest in ELISPOT-positive recipients with donors 50 years or older. CONCLUSION: The combination of advanced donor age and pretransplantation cellular sensitization increases the risk of AR and poor graft function after deceased-donor kidney transplantation beyond the risk associated with each factor alone.

Independent of nephrectomy, weaning immunosuppression leads to late sensitization after kidney transplant failure.

BACKGROUND: Patients returning to dialysis therapy after renal transplant failure have a high rate of human leukocyte antigen antibody sensitization, and sensitization has been linked to allograft nephrectomy. We hypothesized that nephrectomy for cause is a consequence of weaning immunosuppression and that weaning leads to sensitization even in the absence of nephrectomy. METHODS: We examined outcomes in 300 consecutive patients with kidney allograft failure and survival of more than 30 days after failure. We analyzed a subset of 119 patients with a low panel reactive antibody (PRA) before transplantation and follow-up PRA testing at 6 to 24 months after failure (late PRA). RESULTS: By late PRA testing, 56% of patients were highly sensitized (class I or II PRA ≥80%). On multivariate analysis controlling for human leukocyte antigen matching, allograft nephrectomy, and other variables, weaning of immunosuppression predicted high sensitization (odds ratio, 14.34; P=0.004). In a subset of patients, the percentage of those who were highly sensitized increased from 21% at the time of failure on immunosuppressive therapy to 68% by late PRA after weaning (P<0.001). Conversely, patients who maintained immunosuppression showed minimal sensitization after failure. Transplant nephrectomy was required in 41% of patients who weaned immunosuppression versus 0% of the 24 patients who maintained immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitor therapy after failure (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Weaning immunosuppression was a triggering event leading to late rejection and allograft nephrectomy and was an independent predictor of alloantibody sensitization after kidney allograft failure.

Whole-organ pancreas transplantation at Baylor Regional Transplant Institute: a chance to cure diabetes.

The success of pancreas transplantation has improved over the past several decades with advancements in surgical technique, immunosuppressive medicines, and immunologic testing. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with pancreas transplantation from 1995 to 2008. At the Baylor Regional Transplant Program, 151 pancreas transplants were performed in 147 patients: 135 were simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants, 10 were pancreas transplants after kidney transplants, and 6 were pancreas transplants alone. Follow-up information was available for 138 patients. The 1-year acute cellular rejection rate was 31.6%; the 30-day surgical reexploration rate was 10%; and the technical failure rate was 5.3%. Five-year pancreas graft survival rates were 67% for simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants and 50% for pancreas transplants after kidney transplants. These outcomes exceed expected results as calculated by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. In addition, the median time to transplant was 3.8 months, compared with a US median of 14.1 months. Pancreas transplantation is currently the closest thing to a cure for diabetes and should be given as an option for diabetic patients with or without end-stage renal disease.

Predicting renal failure after liver transplantation from measured glomerular filtration rate: review of up to 15 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The immunosuppressive medications that have contributed greatly to the success of liver transplantation are also associated with posttransplant renal dysfunction. We reviewed measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) data from patients who underwent transplantation more than 10 years ago to assess whether results from specific time points can predict renal failure. METHODS: The GFR data were obtained at initial evaluation (IE), at month 3, and at years 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15. Two groupings were compared, one based on GFR at IE and the other at month 3. Patients were further stratified into three GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) groups: G1, GFR more than 80; G2, GFR 60 to 80; and G3, GFR less than 60. RESULTS: A total of 592 liver transplant recipients met the inclusion criteria; 114 had paired GFR data from IE to year 15. Analysis of paired and censored data based on IE GFR showed that 62.2% of G3 patients developed renal failure by year 5; another 6.7% did so by year 10 (P=0.027). The month 3 GFR data showed that 56.3% of G3 patients developed renal failure by year 5; another 15.6% did so by year 10. Surprisingly, 37.0% of G2 patients experienced renal failure by year 5; another 11.1% did so by year 10 (P=0.0024). CONCLUSIONS: The month 3 data indicate a slow but steady decline in GFR over years. The lower the initial GFR is after transplant, the sooner renal failure develops. Patients with GFR less than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 at month 3 have a higher risk of renal failure; however, those who avoid renal failure seem to maintain renal function long term.

Indications for combined liver and kidney transplantation: propositions after a 23-yr experience.

The frequency of combined liver and kidney transplants (CLKT) persists despite the pronounced scarcity of organs. In this review, we sought to ascertain any factors that would reduce the use of these limited commodities. Seventy-five adult CLKT were performed over a 23-yr period at our center, 29 (39%) of which occurred during the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) era. Overall, patient survival rates were 82%, 73%, and 62% at one, three, and five yr, respectively. There was no difference in patient survival based either on pre-transplant hemodialysis status or by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at the time of transplant. Patients undergoing a second CLKT or a liver retransplantation at the time of CLKT had a survival rate of 30% at three months. In the MELD era, patient survival was unchanged (p = NS) despite an older recipient population (p = 0.0029) and a greater number of hepatitis C patients (p = 0.0428). In summary, patients requiring liver retransplantation with concomitant renal failure should be denied CLKT. Renal allografts may also be spared by implementing strict criteria for renal organ allocation (GFR < 30 mL/min at the time of evaluation) and considering the elimination of preemptive kidney transplantation in CLKT.

Acute kidney injury following liver transplantation: definition and outcome.

The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) has been reported to vary between 17% and 95% post-orthotopic liver transplantation. This variability may be related to the absence of a uniform definition of AKI in this setting. The purpose of this study was to identify the degree of AKI that is associated with long-term adverse outcome. Furthermore, to determine the best definition (for use in future studies) of AKI not requiring dialysis in post-liver transplant patients, we retrospectively reviewed the effect of 3 definitions of AKI post-orthotopic liver transplantation on renal and patient outcome between 1997 and 2005. We compared patients with AKI to a control group without AKI by each definition. AKI was defined in 3 groups as an acute rise in serum creatinine, from the pretransplant baseline, of >0.5 mg/dL, >1.0 mg/dL, or >50% above baseline to a value above 2 mg/dL. In all groups, the glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower at both 1 and 2 years post-transplant. Patient survival was worse in all groups. Graft survival was worse in all groups. The incidence of AKI was highest in the group with a rise in creatinine of >0.5 mg/dL (78%) and lowest in patients with a rise in creatinine of >50% above 2.0 mg/dL (14%). Even mild AKI, defined as a rise in serum creatinine of >0.5 mg/dL, was associated with reduced patient and graft survival. However, in comparison with the other definitions, the definition of AKI with the greatest impact on patient's outcome post-liver transplant was a rise in serum creatinine of >50% above baseline to >2 mg/dL.

Twenty years' follow-up of portal vein conduits in liver transplantation.

Portal vein problems remain a formidable challenge in liver transplantation. In select situations, a portal vein conduit can provide a solution. No long-term results have been reported. This study was designed to assess the impact of portal vein conduits on graft survival after liver transplantation and the safety of portal vein conduits and to establish the long-term results (up to 20 years) of portal vein conduits. Data from 2370 adult liver transplants were prospectively collected into a computerized research database and analyzed. All portal vein conduits were constructed from the donor iliac vein obtained at the liver retrieval. Portal vein conduits were required in 35 (1.5%) first transplants. The long-term (up to 20 years of follow-up) graft survival after liver transplantation using portal vein conduits was excellent and comparable to that of the control group. The graft survival was 65% with the conduit versus 66% without the conduit at 5 years of follow-up, 58% versus 51% at 10 years, and 48% versus 35% at 15 years. There was a higher rate (8.6% versus 1.4%) of portal vein thrombosis after the portal vein conduit, and the majority occurred in the first 3 months after transplantation. For the same time period, there was no statistically significant difference in graft survival or patient survival for the retransplants with and without portal vein conduits. There was no statistically significant difference in graft survival or patient survival for the transplants with portal vein conduits and with portal vein thrombendvenectomy. In conclusion, portal vein conduits can be used safely for liver transplantation with no negative impact on long-term graft survival or patient survival. Despite the higher rate of portal vein thrombosis in the immediate postoperative period, excellent long-term results can be obtained.

False aneurysm of a hepatic artery branch complicating intrahepatic islet transplantation.

Islet transplantation, an innovative treatment strategy for type 1 diabetes mellitus, is a relatively safe procedure, with less morbidity than pancreas transplantation. Vascular injuries have not been reported to date. We report a percutaneous transhepatic intraportal islet transplant infusion that was followed by bleeding from a false aneurysm of an intrahepatic branch of the hepatic artery. The bleeding was controlled by selective embolization. Despite the complication and its treatment, the patient gained insulin independence, which was sustained for 285 days. She is currently on a small dose of insulin with good glycemic control.

Twenty years of follow-up of aortohepatic conduits in liver transplantation.

Arterial problems remain a formidable challenge in liver transplantation. In many situations, an aortohepatic conduit can provide a solution. No long-term results (over 5 years) have been reported. This study was designed to assess the impact of aortohepatic conduits on graft survival after liver transplantation and the safety of aortohepatic conduits and to establish the long-term results (up to 20 years) of aortohepatic conduits. Data from 2346 adult liver transplants were prospectively collected into the computerized database and analyzed. In the majority of cases, arterial conduits were constructed from the donor iliac artery obtained at the liver retrieval. Aortohepatic conduits were required in 149 (6.4%) first transplants. The long-term graft survival after liver transplantation using aortohepatic conduits was excellent and comparable to that of the control group. The graft survival was 59% with the conduit versus 67% without the conduit at 5 years of follow-up, 50% versus 52% at 10 years, and 33% versus 35% at 15 years. With up to 20 years of follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in graft survival, patient survival, hepatic artery complications, or biliary complications. For the same time period, there was no statistically significant difference in graft survival or patient survival for the retransplants with and without aortohepatic conduits. In conclusion, in experienced hands, aortohepatic conduits can be used safely for liver transplantation with no negative impact on long-term graft survival, patient survival, hepatic artery complications, or biliary complications. Excellent long-term results can be obtained.

Intraoperative imaging of pancreas transplant allografts using indocyanine green with laser fluorescence.

Vascular thrombosis is a cause of allograft loss after pancreas transplantation. We present the use of intraoperative fluorescence imaging with the SPY imaging device (Novadaq Technologies Inc, Toronto, Canada) in two pancreas transplants as a means to assess potency of the vascular anastomoses. Intravenous indocyanine green 2.5 mg/mL was fluoresced with the device to create the intraoperative video sequences, which were recorded. After 60-day follow-up, real-time SPY imaging on these two pancreas transplants did not demonstrate adverse effects on patients or the transplanted allografts. This method of vascular imaging could prove useful in improving short-term graft survival and possibly lowering the thrombosis rates seen with pancreas transplantation. Long-term correlation studies between intraoperative findings and graft survival must be performed to confirm the utility of this imaging method.

Late acute rejection after liver transplantation impacts patient survival.

Hepatic allograft rejection still remains an important problem following liver transplantation. Early acute rejection, occurring within three months of transplant, is a common event and usually of lesser significance with respect to prognosis than other non-immune-related post-transplant morbidities. However, little is known about late acute rejection (LAR) including factors affecting its occurrence and long-term outcome. In this study, we analyzed LAR including the incidence, clinical risk factors, patient survival, and graft survival. LAR was defined as acute cellular rejection later than six months after liver transplant. Adult patients who had a minimum of 24 months of graft survival were included in this study. A total of 1604 case records of consecutive adult patients (over age 18 yr) who underwent liver transplant between 1985 and 2003 were reviewed. Of the 1604 patients, 305 (19.0%) developed LAR. Patients with primary diagnoses of autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis had higher incidences of LAR, while patients with metabolic disease and retransplant had lower incidence of LAR (p = 0.0024). The LAR group had more female and younger recipients than the no LAR group (p = 0.0026, p = 0.0131, respectively). Patient survival as well as graft survival were significantly lower in the LAR group (p = 0.0083, p = 0.0075, respectively). PTLD was the only significant independent predictor of late rejection. The careful management and treatment of PTLD, especially immunosuppressive management, is important to prevent LAR, which is related to poorer patient survival.

Liver transplantation for cystic fibrosis in adults.

PURPOSE: To expand our knowledge on liver transplantation for cirrhosis associated with cystic fibrosis in adults. METHODS: Five patients who underwent a liver transplantation due to cystic fibrosis were reviewed. The outcome of the patients in terms of age, immunosuppression regimen, patient and graft survival, and pre- and post-transplant complications were investigated. RESULTS: Five adult liver transplant patients had cystic fibrosis (0.2%). These included 4 men and 1 woman with a mean age of 31 +/- 10, ranging from 22 to 52 years old at the time of transplantation. All patients had lung problems. Four patients had exocrine and two had endocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Two are currently alive with a follow-up of 5.8 years and 4 months after transplantation, respectively. There were three deaths from pulmonary embolism at 4.5 years, myocardial infarction with cyclosporine nephrotoxicity at 10.7 years, and lymphoproliferative disorder at 5 months after transplantation. No deaths occurred from lung infection. Only one patient had postoperative pulmonary infectious complications, which were successfully treated with antibiotics and did not result in mortality. CONCLUSION: Adult liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease associated with cystic fibrosis offers encouraging results with a rapid general improvement after surgery and it is now considered to be a safe and acceptable treatment for this disease population.

Use of two expanded-criteria-donor renal allografts in a single patient.

The disparity between the number of available renal donors and the number of patients on the transplant waiting list has prompted the use of expanded-criteria-donor (ECD) renal allografts to expand the donor pool. ECD allografts have shown good results in appropriately selected recipients, yet a number of renal allografts are still discarded. The use of dual renal transplantation may lower the discard rate. Additionally, the use of perfusion systems may improve acute tubular necrosis rates with these allografts. We report a successful case of a dual transplant with ECD allografts using a perfusion system. The biopsy appearance and the pump characteristics were suboptimal for these kidneys, making them unsuitable for single transplantation; however, the pair of transplanted kidneys provided increased nephron mass and functioned well. We recommend that ECD kidneys that are individually nontransplantable be evaluated for potential dual renal transplantation. Biopsy criteria and perfusion data guidelines must be developed to improve the success rates with ECD dual renal allografts. Finally, recipient selection is of utmost importance.