Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Vasc Access ; 24(6): 1227-1234, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35302422

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We describe a technique to mature a basilic/brachial vein in the mid-arm in preparation for a second stage loop proximal brachial artery to basilic/brachial vein arteriovenous graft (BBAVG). This can occur after a failed basilic/brachial vein transposition or a lack of adequate veins in the distal arm. This allows a mature vein to be used in an end-to-end configuration as an outflow to a BBAVG while preserving proximal vessels for the future. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study was performed from 2015 to 2021, including 104 AVG patients divided into three groups: (1) Patients who failed a basilic vein transposition and had an enlarged vein suitable for an AVG outflow; (2) Patients who had a small caliber basilic/brachial vein after the transposition, requiring a mid-arm brachial artery to brachial/basilic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation with a subsequent AVG extension; (3) and lastly, patients who had no distal arm veins available and required a primary brachial artery to basilic/brachial AVF with AVG extension. A survival analysis was performed looking at time to loss of primary and secondary patency, calculated with Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 11 months (IQ = 11-30 months). The survival analysis showed 28% lost primary patency at a median time of 9 months, and 14% lost secondary patency at a median time of 61 months. Overall secondary patency of the vascular access measured at 12 months was 85.6%. Loss of primary (p = 0.008) and secondary patency (p = 0.017), as well as patency during the first 12 months (p = 0.036), were all significantly associated with increased age when adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the graft extension technique using a mature vein from a previous fistula can result in reliable and durable access. This is important for patients with limited access for hemodialysis, as the axillary vein is preserved for future use if needed.


Subject(s)
Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical , Brachial Artery , Humans , Brachial Artery/diagnostic imaging , Brachial Artery/surgery , Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical/adverse effects , Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical/methods , Retrospective Studies , Renal Dialysis , Vascular Patency , Treatment Outcome
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 44: 418.e1-418.e5, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28499862

ABSTRACT

Blunt traumatic aortic injury is the second leading cause of death in trauma patients aged 4-34 years. Of the patients who are able to receive treatment, mortality rates as high as 40% have been reported. Endovascular repair options have allowed for more expeditious repairs with reduced iatrogenic trauma; however, when the injury involves the ascending aorta or arch, current endografts lack fenestrations needed for cerebral blood flow. Traditionally, on pump, cardiopulmonary bypass with systemic anticoagulation has been used to repair these injuries. In this paper, we describe a unique case of repairing a large traumatic aortic arch pseudoaneurysm in the setting of which systemic anticoagulation is contraindicated. The patient is a 39-year-old otherwise healthy Hispanic male who presented to Ryder Trauma Center in Miami, Florida, following a motor vehicle collision and found to have multiple intracranial hemorrhages and a large aortic pseudoaneurysm of the distal ascending aorta. In lieu of standard cardiopulmonary bypass, a hybrid approach was utilized. Cranial blood flow was maintained using a temporary extra-anatomical left femoral to bilateral carotid bypass during endovascular coverage of the aortic arch. Aortic arch revascularization was then achieved by means of in situ laser fenestration of the innominate artery followed by a right-to-left carotid-carotid-subclavian bypass. This case demonstrates the viability of a hybrid vascular repair of a complex aortic disruption without the use of systemic anticoagulation in the setting of contraindicated or unknown risk of systemic anticoagulation. Further research is warranted on whether emergent traumatic cases with contraindications to anticoagulation can be performed in a similar fashion to safely reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with aortic disruptions.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Aorta, Thoracic/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Brain Injuries, Diffuse , Vascular System Injuries/surgery , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery , Adult , Aorta, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Aorta, Thoracic/injuries , Aortography/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Brain Injuries, Diffuse/diagnostic imaging , Computed Tomography Angiography , Contraindications, Drug , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome , Vascular System Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Vascular System Injuries/etiology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...