Quality of life in adolescent and adult patients with persistent allergic rhinitis after one year of subcutaneous immunotherapy with a modified mite extract.

Introduction: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (AR) is an IgE-mediated inflammation of nasal and ocular mucosa after environmental allergen exposure, mainly by house dust mites (HDM). AR affects more than one third of the population worldwide and it is associated with loss of quality of life (QoL). Aim: To analyse the improvement in the QoL in 50 patients with moderate-persistent AR due to house HDM before and after receiving 1 year of subcutaneous specific aeroallergen immunotherapy treatment (SAIT). Material and methods: A prospective observational study was performed based on clinical practice in 50 patients with moderate-severe persistent AR due to HDM and candidates to SAIT. Forty-one patients completed the study. Patients were evaluated with the ESPRINT short-version QoL questionnaire, a score of medication use and visual analogue scale (VAS) symptom score, prior to and 12 months after SAIT. Results: Forty-one patients (25 women, mean age 26.9 years). Mean ESPRINT values prior to the start SAIT was 3.06 (moderate-severe) and 1 year after starting subcutaneous SAIT the mean value dropped in all patients to 0.88 (mild). The VAS score symptom dropped from 8.26 to 3.68. 97.56% of patients used 3 or more drugs (oral antihistamine, ophthalmic/intranasal antihistamine, intranasal corticosteroid and/or oral antileukotrienes) prior to starting SAIT, and 1 year after it, 58.53% used one on-demand medication to control symptoms, oral antihistamine or nasal spray, and not daily use. Conclusions: Subcutaneous SAIT seems to be a valid treatment in our patients with moderate-persistent AR due to HDM, since it reduces the ESPRINT score, VAS score and the use of medication. An improvement in the quality of life and satisfaction was observed by the patients themselves.

Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy: an EAACI Position Paper.

Chemotherapeutic drugs have been widely used in the treatment of cancer disease for about 70 years. The development of new treatments has not hindered their use, and oncologists still prescribe them routinely, alone or in combination with other antineoplastic agents. However, all chemotherapeutic agents can induce hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), with different incidences depending on the culprit drug. These reactions are the third leading cause of fatal drug-induced anaphylaxis in the United States. In Europe, deaths related to chemotherapy have also been reported. In particular, most reactions are caused by platinum compounds, taxanes, epipodophyllotoxins and asparaginase. Despite their prevalence and relevance, the ideal pathways for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of these reactions are still unclear, and practice remains considerably heterogeneous with vast differences from center to center. Thus, the European Network on Drug Allergy and Drug Allergy Interest Group of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology organized a task force to provide data and recommendations regarding the allergological work-up in this field of drug hypersensitivity reactions. This position paper aims to provide consensus on the investigation of HSRs to chemotherapeutic drugs and give practical recommendations for clinicians that treat these patients, such as oncologists, allergologists and internists. Key sections cover risk factors, pathogenesis, symptoms, the role of skin tests, in vitro tests, indications and contraindications of drug provocation tests and desensitization of neoplastic patients with allergic reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs. Statements, recommendations and unmet needs were discussed and proposed at the end of each section.

Hypersensitivity reactions to biologicals: An EAACI position paper.

Biologicals are crucial targeted therapeutic agents in oncological, immunological, and inflammatory diseases, and their use in clinical practice is broadening. In recent years, the spread of Personalized Precision Medicine has facilitated a proliferation of new treatment options, especially biologicals. Consequently, biologicals are now among the drugs that most frequently cause hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Patients can develop HSRs to these agents during the first-lifetime exposure or after repeated exposure, and these HSRs can be potentially life-threatening or limit therapeutic options. Despite the relatively high prevalence, the underlying mechanisms of these HSRs remain obscure, and the optimal management pathways are still a matter of discussion. In this Position Paper, the authors will provide evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and managing HSRs to biologicals. Additionally, the document defines unmet needs as an opportunity to shape future research.

Drug hypersensitivity in the fast lane: What clinicians should know about phenotypes, endotypes, and biomarkers.

OBJECTIVE: To review novel concepts in drug hypersensitivity and the management of immediate hypersensitivity reactions. DATA SOURCES: English language literature on MEDLINE and Embase surrounding drug hypersensitivity and desensitization. STUDY SELECTIONS: References were selected based on relevance, date of publication, and originality. RESULTS: There are numerous citations looking at categorizing drug reactions, pathogenesis, biomarkers, and desensitization. Current understanding supports the use of a phenotype-endotype-biomarker model for categorizing immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Drug desensitization is a powerful therapeutic strategy that enables temporary induction of tolerance to medications that triggered immediate reactions. CONCLUSION: Immediate hypersensitivity reactions are diverse in presentation and pathogenesis. Drug desensitization is an effective intervention with sufficient evidence to support its more widespread availability.