ABSTRACT
Introducción: La valoración de la capacidad tusígena se realiza con la medición del flujo espiratorio máximo durante la tos (peak-flow tos [PFT]). Sin embargo, esta valoración podría alterarse por enfermedades con obstrucción espiratoria de la vía aérea. El objetivo fue valorar la medición de la capacidad tusígena mediante PFT en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC), así como las correlaciones con la función pulmonar, muscular respiratoria y orofaríngea. Métodos: Se seleccionaron los pacientes con EPOC y con enfermedad neuromuscular, así como los sujetos sanos a los que se había realizado una medición de la fuerza de los músculos respiratorios de forma asistencial. De esta población, se analizaron los valores de la función respiratoria, así como la fuerza muscular orofaríngea. En un subgrupo de pacientes con EPOC se realizó el estudio de deglución por videofluoroscopia. Resultados: Se incluyeron 307 sujetos (59,3% EPOC, 38,4% enfermedades neuromusculares y 2,3% sanos). En el grupo EPOC, el PFT se encontraba disminuido de forma estadísticamente significativa comparado tanto con el grupo de los sanos como con los enfermos neuromusculares. El 70% de los EPOC tenían una disminución patológica del PFT. Solamente, existía una correlación directa entre el PFT con el grado de obstrucción bronquial y la fuerza de los músculos espiratorios. No se encontró alteración de la función de los músculos inspiratorios ni orofaríngeos. Conclusiones: La utilización del PFT en los pacientes con EPOC no refleja la capacidad tusígena ya que se ve influenciada por el grado de obstrucción bronquial. Por tanto, se deberían valorar nuevas pruebas diagnósticas para la medición de la capacidad tusígena, fundamentalmente, en los pacientes que coexistan enfermedades neuromusculares y patología obstructiva bronquial grave.(AU)
Introduction: Cough capacity is assessed by measuring cough peak flow (CPF). However, this assessment could be altered by obstructive airway diseases. The aim was to assess measurement of cough capacity by CPF in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), as well as correlations with pulmonary, respiratory muscle, and oropharyngeal function. Methods: Patients with COPD, and with neuromuscular disease, were selected as well as healthy subjects who had undergone respiratory muscle strength measurement in a healthcare setting. From this population, respiratory function values and lung and oropharyngeal muscle function were analysed. A subgroup of COPD patients underwent a videofluoroscopic swallow study. Results: Three hundred and seven subjects were included (59.3% COPD, 38.4% neuromuscular diseases, and 2.3% healthy). CPF was found to be statistically significantly decreased in the COPD group compared to both the healthy and neuromuscular disease groups. Of the COPD patients, 70% had a pathological decrease in CPF. There was only a direct correlation between CPF with the degree of bronchial obstruction and expiratory muscle strength. No alteration of inspiratory or oropharyngeal muscle function was found. Conclusions: The use of CPF in COPD patients does not reflect cough capacity as it is influenced by the degree of bronchial obstruction. Therefore, new diagnostic tests to measure cough capacity should be considered, especially in patients with coexisting neuromuscular diseases and severe bronchial obstructive disease.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Cough/complications , Respiratory Tract Diseases/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/complications , Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate , Neuromuscular Diseases/complications , Respiratory Muscles , Cough/etiology , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/diagnosis , Neuromuscular Diseases/diagnosisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cough capacity is assessed by measuring cough peak flow (CPF). However, this assessment could be altered by obstructive airway diseases. The aim was to assess measurement of cough capacity by CPF in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), as well as correlations with pulmonary, respiratory muscle, and oropharyngeal function. METHODS: Patients with COPD, and with neuromuscular disease, were selected as well as healthy subjects who had undergone respiratory muscle strength measurement in a healthcare setting. From this population, respiratory function values and lung and oropharyngeal muscle function were analysed. A subgroup of COPD patients underwent a videofluoroscopic swallow study. RESULTS: Three hundred and seven subjects were included (59.3% COPD, 38.4% neuromuscular diseases, and 2.3% healthy). CPF was found to be statistically significantly decreased in the COPD group compared to both the healthy and neuromuscular disease groups. Of the COPD patients, 70% had a pathological decrease in CPF. There was only a direct correlation between CPF with the degree of bronchial obstruction and expiratory muscle strength. No alteration of inspiratory or oropharyngeal muscle function was found. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CPF in COPD patients does not reflect cough capacity as it is influenced by the degree of bronchial obstruction. Therefore, new diagnostic tests to measure cough capacity should be considered, especially in patients with coexisting neuromuscular diseases and severe bronchial obstructive disease.
Subject(s)
Neuromuscular Diseases , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Humans , Cough/etiology , Cough/complications , Peak Expiratory Flow Rate/physiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Respiratory Muscles , Neuromuscular Diseases/complications , Neuromuscular Diseases/diagnosisABSTRACT
Introducción La fisioterapia respiratoria es parte imprescindible del tratamiento de las patologías hipersecretoras o con compromiso de la capacidad tusígena. Hasta el momento se desconoce el efecto del dispositivo de terapia de oscilación de alta frecuencia en la pared torácica (HFCWO) sobre la fuerza de los músculos respiratorios y los efectos sobre la mecánica respiratoria y la dinámica de los gases respiratorios. Por ello, el objetivo de este estudio fue describir estos tres aspectos en sujetos sanos. Métodos Se midió la fuerza de los músculos respiratorios en 25 sujetos antes e inmediatamente después de terapia con HFCWO. Durante la sesión, se midieron continuamente los parámetros de ventilación, la dinámica de los gases respiratorios y la frecuencia cardiaca. Se llevaron a cabo dos sesiones idénticas por sujeto, separadas 24h. Se registraron los síntomas durante la sesión y las molestias experimentadas mediante escala analógica visual (EVA). Resultados La terapia con HFCWO produce un incremento de la ventilación asociado con una alteración de la dinámica de los gases respiratorios. También se aumenta la frecuencia cardiaca, sin modificación de la oxigenación tisular. No se observaron efectos sobre la fuerza de los músculos respiratorios. Hasta un 20% de los participantes indicó molestias importantes (EVA≥5/10) durante la sesión. Conclusiones Durante la aplicación de HFCWO en sujetos sanos se produce incremento en la ventilación y ritmo cardiaco. Sin embargo, aparecen efectos indeseables sobre la dinámica de los gases respiratorios y un grado elevado de intolerancia por parte de los voluntarios y no hay efectos sobre la fuerza de los músculos respiratorios (AU)
Introduction Chest physiotherapy is an essential part of the treatment of respiratory diseases with increased respiratory secretion and ineffective cough. To date, there have been no studies on the effect of high frequency chest wall oscillatory (HFCWO) therapy on respiratory muscle strength, ventilation and gas exchange. The aim of this study was therefore to assess these three factors in healthy participants. Methods Respiratory muscle strength was measured before and immediately after HFCWO therapy in 25 healthy participants. During the treatment, we continuously measured ventilation parameters, gas exchange, oxygen saturation and heart rate. All participants underwent HFCWO sessions twice (with 24hours difference) with the same procedure. Symptoms during the session and discomfort were measured with the visual analog scale (VAS). Results HFCWO therapy produced a change in breathing pattern with increased ventilation associated with altered gas exchange. Heart rate also increased, with no changes in oxygenation. There was no effect, either beneficial or deleterious, on the strength of respiratory muscles. Up to 20% of participants reported substantial discomfort (VAS≥5/10) during the session. Conclusions This study shows that, during the application of HFCWO therapy in healthy participants, ventilation and heart rate increased. However, there were undesirable effects on gas exchange with a high degree of intolerance among volunteers, with no effects on respiratory muscle strength (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Chest Wall Oscillation , Respiratory Muscles/physiology , Breathing Exercises/methods , Respiratory Mechanics/physiology , Healthy Volunteers , SpirometryABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Chest physiotherapy is an essential part of the treatment of respiratory diseases with increased respiratory secretion and ineffective cough. To date, there have been no studies on the effect of high frequency chest wall oscillatory (HFCWO) therapy on respiratory muscle strength, ventilation and gas exchange. The aim of this study was therefore to assess these three factors in healthy participants. METHODS: Respiratory muscle strength was measured before and immediately after HFCWO therapy in 25 healthy participants. During the treatment, we continuously measured ventilation parameters, gas exchange, oxygen saturation and heart rate. All participants underwent HFCWO sessions twice (with 24hours difference) with the same procedure. Symptoms during the session and discomfort were measured with the visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: HFCWO therapy produced a change in breathing pattern with increased ventilation associated with altered gas exchange. Heart rate also increased, with no changes in oxygenation. There was no effect, either beneficial or deleterious, on the strength of respiratory muscles. Up to 20% of participants reported substantial discomfort (VAS≥5/10) during the session. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that, during the application of HFCWO therapy in healthy participants, ventilation and heart rate increased. However, there were undesirable effects on gas exchange with a high degree of intolerance among volunteers, with no effects on respiratory muscle strength.
