ABSTRACT
A first comparison of an image analysis method with classical hand measurement was made using the mesio-distal diameter data derived by the simplest image analysis method, the jawview mode. Fifty casts of male Hong Kong Chinese dental students, mean age 20.4 years, were examined by both methods. The two techniques gave comparable overall results, the correlation coefficients generally being greater than 0.9. A combination of the buccal and occlusal image analysis views gave the best correlation with hand measurement with a comparable variability for different tooth types. For certain teeth, particularly posteriors, reproducibility was better using hand measurement. Optimal weighting of the data from these two different image analysis views can give an "estimated hand measurement" value. Further development of the method to deal with differing orientations of teeth is possible.
