What Is a Surgical Site Infection After Carpal Tunnel Release?

PURPOSE: Considerable variation exists in the literature on published rates of surgical site infection (SSI) after carpal tunnel release, ranging over 20-fold, from 0.28% to 6.4%. The reason for this variability is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 748 open carpal tunnel releases performed under wide-awake local anesthetic no tourniquet in an in-office procedure room. The following three different definitions of infection were used for analysis: definition A: prescription of an oral antibiotic; Definition B: SSI definition by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Definition C: infection that required reoperation. RESULTS: Infection rate by definition A was 8.9% (67/748), by definition B was 2.3% (17/748), and by definition C was 0.4% (3/748), resulting in a 22-fold range. CONCLUSIONS: The infection rate after carpal tunnel release is heavily influenced by the definition of SSI. The definition of SSI needs to be considered when making comparisons, either in research or quality assurance/quality improvement applications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When analyzing SSI rates, the exact definition of infection must be ascertained to accurately compare an individual's practice or institutional data to the literature.

Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Primer for Hand and Peripheral Nerve Surgeons.

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is a complex condition and is commonly misunderstood. Historically, much of this confusion has been because of its grouping with other diagnoses that have little in common other than anatomic location. Modern understanding emphasizes the role of small unmyelinated C type pain and sympathetic fibers. Diagnosis is primarily clinical, after ruling out other common conditions. Hand therapy is usually the first-line treatment with variable success. Local anesthetic, botulinum toxins, or steroid injections can aid in diagnosis and offer short-term relief. Although surgery can yield reliable results, it is technically challenging, and the preferred surgical approach is a matter of debate. Despite limitations in diagnosis and treatment, recognition and successful treatment of this condition can be highly impactful for the patient.

Changes in Management at the Postoperative Visit After In-Office Wide Awake Local Anesthetic No Tourniquet Carpal Tunnel Release.

PURPOSE: Patients are commonly seen for two postoperative visits following carpal tunnel release (CTR), the first visit being at 1-2 weeks and the second at approximately 6 weeks. Our study aimed to determine if these visits led to changes in postoperative medical management. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 748 procedures performed in an in-office procedure room under wide awake local anesthetic no tourniquet between August 2020 and December 2022. Charts were reviewed for changes in management related to the patient's CTR. Management changes involving a separate diagnosis or solely an additional follow-up visit were classified as unrelated to postoperative CTR care. RESULTS: A total of 730 patients returned for follow-up. There were 100 patients (13.7 %) who had a CTR-related change in management at the first postoperative visit. Most management changes at this timepoint were due to superficial surgical site infection. There were 29 patients (4.0 %) who had a CTR-related change in management at their second postoperative visit, most commonly a referral to therapy for stiffness or hypersensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: While postoperative visits for CTR may have intangible benefits, changes in CTR-related care occur only in 17.7% of patients. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

The Clinical Outcomes of Radiocapitellar Reconstruction With Radiocapitellar Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Radiocapitellar arthroplasty fills a treatment void for young patients who experience isolated capitellar fractures or radiocapitellar osteoarthritis who are not candidates for total elbow arthroplasty. The outcomes of this procedure are sparsely reported. We designed a meta-analysis to determine the utility of radiocapitellar arthroplasty with respect to functional and patient reported outcomes. Methods: The PubMed database was searched for relevant studies. Only studies published in English language that assessed patient reported outcomes following radiocapitellar arthroplasty were included in this study. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for 2020. Results: The initial review yielded 562 studies that met the criteria. After excluding duplications and confounding factors, eight case series were identified for review. Of the eight studies, seven were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis for Mayo Elbow Performance Score, flexion-extension arc, and pronation-supination arc. The pooled standard mean difference was found to be statistically significant between pre-operative and post-operative outcomes for Mayo Elbow Performance Score (SMD = 3.04, 95% CI [2.40, 3.67]), flexion-extension arc (SMD = 1.28, 95% CI [0.73, 1.83]), and pronation-supination arc (SMD = 0.81, 95% CI [0.43, 1.18]). Cochran's Q-test and I2 statistics indicated statistically significant heterogeneity for Mayo Elbow Performance Score (p = .04, I2 = 54%) and flexion-extension arc (p < .01, I2 = 67%). Conclusions: Patients undergoing radiocapitellar arthroplasty showed statistically significant improvements in flexion-extension arc, pronation-supination arc, and Mayo Elbow Performance Scores compared to pre-operative measures.