Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Future Oncol ; 20(8): 447-458, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37882460

ABSTRACT

Aim: We assessed relative efficacy and safety of amivantamab versus mobocertinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion (exon20ins) mutations who progressed on prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Materials & methods: This matching-adjusted indirect comparison used patient-level data from CHRYSALIS (NCT02609776) and aggregate data from a mobocertinib trial (NCT02716116) to match populations on all clinically relevant confounders. Results: While both agents had similar efficacy for time-to-event outcomes, objective response rate was significantly higher for amivantamab. 15 of 23 any-grade treatment-related adverse events reported for mobocertinib were significantly less common for amivantamab versus only two for mobocertinib. Conclusion: Results suggest that amivantamab has an improved response rate with similar survival and a more favorable safety profile versus mobocertinib in EGFR exon20ins non-small-cell lung cancer.


Subject(s)
Aniline Compounds , Antibodies, Bispecific , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Indoles , Lung Neoplasms , Pyrimidines , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Exons , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Mutation , Platinum , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects
2.
J Comp Eff Res ; 7(5): 421-441, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29210593

ABSTRACT

AIM: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis were conducted to determine the relative efficacy and safety of interventions for treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients, as comparative evidence is scarce. MATERIALS & METHODS: Relative treatment effects of progression-free survival, overall survival and safety outcomes were estimated via network meta-analysis based on data identified via systematic literature review. RESULTS: Ibrutinib was superior in all pairwise comparisons for progression-free survival (probability to be better [P] range: overall population: 69-100%; fludarabine-ineligible population: 69-100%) and overall survival (P range: overall: 89-100%; fludarabine-ineligible: 91-100%) and had the highest probability of being best for all outcomes. CONCLUSION: Ibrutinib provides superior benefit in survival and safety compared with other front-line treatments of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/mortality , Network Meta-Analysis , Piperidines , Progression-Free Survival , Vidarabine/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...