Subject(s)
Device Removal , Intrauterine Devices , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Female , Humans , PregnancyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Pregnancies complicated by a retained intrauterine device (IUD) are at increased risk for adverse outcomes such as miscarriage and preterm labour. There is limited evidence to guide the management of retained IUDs in pregnancy when the strings are not visible at the external cervical os. We describe a method for IUD retrieval in such cases. METHODS: Twenty-six patients underwent saline hysteroscopy with or without concurrent ultrasound guidance for retrieval of a retained IUD in early pregnancy between 2002 and 2015. We retrospectively evaluated procedural and pregnancy-related outcomes in this case series. RESULTS: The average gestational age at the time of the procedure was 11+0 weeks. Successful IUD retrieval occurred in 22 of 26 cases (84.6%). There were 23 live births, including 20 full term and three preterm deliveries. The average gestational age at delivery was 38+4 weeks. There was one miscarriage and one elective termination of pregnancy following the procedure. There were no complications directly related to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Saline hysteroscopy is a safe and effective method for retrieval of a retained IUD in early pregnancy. It appears that concurrent ultrasound guidance can facilitate IUD localization, but more cases are needed to confirm this. Pregnancy outcomes after IUD retrieval were favourable, with a low rate of miscarriage and preterm labour.
Subject(s)
Device Removal , Hysteroscopy , Intrauterine Devices , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Adult , Device Removal/methods , Device Removal/statistics & numerical data , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Hysteroscopy/methods , Hysteroscopy/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Successful adoption of a new surgical procedure varies among practicing surgeons, and skill acquisition depends on the surgeon's innate ability, the complexity of the technique, and training. We report intraoperative and near-term postoperative outcomes from the Acessa procedure conducted by minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons new to Acessa, and report the surgeons' experiences during the training period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was designed as a postmarket, prospective, single-arm, multicenter analysis of operative and early postoperative outcomes after proctored surgical training with the Acessa device and procedure (laparoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of symptomatic fibroids) in premenopausal, menstruating women as conducted in community and university hospitals in the USA and Canada. Surgeons completed evaluation forms once they felt they could safely and comfortably conduct the operations. RESULTS: Ten gynecologic surgeons without prior Acessa experience completed 40 Acessa procedures - all on an outpatient basis. Mean procedure time was 1.9±1.0 hours and was similar to that reported in the pivotal premarket study (2.1±1.0 hours). Two intraoperative complications occurred: a 1 cm uterine serosal laceration due to uterine manipulation and blood loss from both the probe insertion site and the lysis of uterine-omental adhesions. No postoperative complications or reinterventions for fibroid symptoms were reported. The surgeons completed the evaluation forms after two to five cases, and none found any factors affecting procedure efficiency to be inferior or needing improvement. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons new to Acessa can perform the procedure and provide acceptable outcomes after two to five proctored cases.
