A Real-Time Automated Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Mortality in Trauma Patients: Survey Says it's Ready for Prime-Time.

BACKGROUND: Though artificial intelligence ("AI") has been increasingly applied to patient care, many of these predictive models are retrospective and not readily available for real-time decision-making. This survey-based study aims to evaluate implementation of a new, validated mortality risk calculator (Parkland Trauma Index of Mortality, "PTIM") embedded in our electronic healthrecord ("EHR") that calculates hourly predictions of mortality with high sensitivity and specificity. METHODS: This is a prospective, survey-based study performed at a level 1 trauma center. An anonymous survey was sent to surgical providers and regarding PTIM implementation. The PTIM score evaluates 23 variables including Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), vital signs, and laboratory data. RESULTS: Of the 40 completed surveys, 35 reported using PTIM in decision-making. Prior to reviewing PTIM, providers identified perceived top 3 predictors of mortality, including GCS (22/38, 58%), age (18/35, 47%), and maximum heart rate (17/35, 45%). Most providers reported the PTIM assisted their treatment decisions (27/35, 77%) and timing of operative intervention (23/35, 66%). Many providers agreed that PTIM integrated into rounds and patient assessment (22/36, 61%) and that it improved efficiency in assessing patients' potential mortality (21/36, 58%). CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence algorithms are mostly retrospective and lag in real-time prediction of mortality. To our knowledge, this is the first real-time, automated algorithm predicting mortality in trauma patients. In this small survey-based study, we found PTIM assists in decision-making, timing of intervention, and improves accuracy in assessing mortality. Next steps include evaluating the short- and long-term impact on patient outcomes.

Technical Trick: Traction Table-Assisted Lateral Decubitus Patient Positioning in Cephalomedullary Nailing of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures.

SUMMARY: Cephalomedullary nail fixation of geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures is, and will continue to be, performed by most orthopaedic surgeons. The influence of technical factors on outcome is clear, and it is imperative that orthopaedic surgeons use contemporary strategies to achieve adequate reduction and fixation. The lateral patient position on a traction table potentially confers several advantages which surgeons can use to achieve quality outcomes even in patients who have challenging body morphology and/or fracture anatomy. A preferred surgical technique for lateral positioning is presented here and a case series comparing supine versus lateral nailing procedures. Lateral positioning was used more frequently in obese patients and by trauma-trained surgeons, and the results equal or exceed those in supine cases with respect to reduction and placement of fixation. Training surgeons in lateral nailing can deliver a reproducible strategy for reduction and fixation in straightforward and complex cases. By mastering the setup and technique on more simple cases, surgeons can be better prepared for the more complex where advantages of lateral nailing are even more apparent.

Parkland Trauma Index of Mortality in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: An Initial Report.

OBJECTIVES: The extent and timing of surgery in severely injured patients remains an unsolved problem in orthopaedic trauma. Different laboratory values or scores have been used to try to predict mortality and estimate physiological reserve. The Parkland Trauma Index of Mortality (PTIM) has been validated as an electronic medical record-integrated algorithm to help with operative timing in trauma patients. The aim of this study was to report our initial experience with PTIM and how it relates to other scores. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of level 1 and level 2 trauma patients admitted to our institution between December 2020 and November 2022 was conducted. Patients scored with PTIM with orthopaedic injuries were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were patients younger than 18 years. RESULTS: Seven hundred seventy-four patients (246 female patients) with a median age of 40.5 (18-101) were included. Mortality was 3.1%. Patients in the PTIM high-risk category (≥0.5) had a 20% mortality rate. The median PTIM was 0.075 (0-0.89) and the median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 9.0 (1-59). PTIM (P < 0.001) and ISS (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in surviving patients. PTIM was mentioned in 7.6% of cases, and in 1.7% of cases, providers indicated an action in response to the PTIM. PTIM and ISS were significantly higher in patients with documented PTIM. CONCLUSION: PTIM is better at predicting mortality compared with ISS. Our low rate of PTIM documentation in provider notes highlights the challenges of implementing a new algorithm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Risk Factors and Characteristics of Recalcitrant Osteomyelitis After Initial Surgical and Antibiotic Treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the injury, patient, and microbiological characteristics that place patients at risk for recalcitrant fracture-related infection and osteomyelitis despite appropriate initial treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Three level I trauma centers. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and fifty-seven patients undergoing surgical debridement and antibiotic therapy for osteomyelitis from 2003 to 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patients were categorized as having undergone serial bone debridement if they had 2 separate procedures a minimum of 6 weeks apart with a full course of appropriate antibiotics in between. Patient records were reviewed for age, injury location, body mass index, smoking status, comorbidities, and culture results including the presence of multidrug-resistant organisms and culture-negative osteomyelitis. RESULTS: A total of 257 patients were identified; 49% (n = 125) had a successful single course of treatment, and 51% (n = 132) required repeat debridement for recalcitrant osteomyelitis. At the index treatment for osteomyelitis, the most common organisms in both groups were methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). There was no significant difference in incidence of polymicrobial infection between the 2 groups (25% vs. 20%, P = 0.49). The most common organisms cultured at the time of repeat saucerization remained MRSA and MSSA; however, the same organism was cultured from both the index and repeat procedures in only 28% (n = 37) of cases. Diabetic patients, intravenous drug use status, delay to diagnosis, and open fractures of the lower leg are independent risk factors for failure of initial treatment of posttraumatic osteomyelitis. CONCLUSIONS: Successful eradication of fracture-related infection and posttraumatic osteomyelitis is difficult and fails 51% of the time despite standard surgical and antimicrobial therapy. Although MRSA and MSSA remain the most common organisms cultured, patients who fail initial treatment for osteomyelitis often do not culture the same organisms as those obtained at the index procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifying safe corridors for anterior pelvic percutaneous instrumentation using computed tomography-based anatomical relationships.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous anterior pelvic ring instrumentation is performed for retrograde screw fixation of ramus fractures, as well as for repair of pubic symphysis diastasis. The anatomic relationships of critical structures around the anterior pelvic ring, such as the spermatic cord and round ligament, have been described in only a few studies regarding the risk of iatrogenic injury during surgery. Our goal is to further describe these relationships, as well as provide radiographic information on safe corridors for percutaneous fixation. METHODS: Eighty (80) axial computed tomography scans of the abdomen, obtained for non traumatic diagnostic purposes and screened for prior abdominal trauma or procedures, were evaluated by 3 fellowship trained radiologists. Mid-symphyseal cuts were used to obtain several measurements relative to the spermatic cords (SC) or round ligaments (RL): inter-cord or inter-ligament distance, skin to cortex of symphysis distance (vertical), skin to cortex of symphysis distance (oblique), safe corridor distance (between SC/RL and femoral triangle), center safe angle (relative to bilateral ischia), maximal safe angle, and minimal safe angle. RESULTS: There were 41 male and 39 female scans included in the final analysis. The average inter-cord distance was 50.2 mm, skin to cortex vertical distance of 43.0 mm, skin to cortex oblique distance of 83.5 mm, safe corridor distance 26.3 mm, center safe angle 19.3˚, maximal safe angle 32.3˚, and minimal safe angle 13.6˚. These were further broken down by range and gender in Table 1. Agreement between radiologists was high for these different measurements with the exception of the skin to cortex oblique distance in female patients and the maximal safe angle in female patients, due to absence of round ligament in a majority of the scans. The round ligament was only present at the mid-symphyseal level for our three reviewers in 37/39, 36/39, and 24/39 of female patient scans. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified defined safe corridors for instrumentation of the anterior pelvic ring that can assist the surgeon in percutaneous application of fixation for fracture care.

Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Transsacral Fixation Constructs in a Type 61C, Zone II Pelvic Fracture Model.

OBJECTIVES: OTA/AO 61C pelvic ring injuries are vertically unstable because of complete sacral fractures combined with anterior ring injury. The objective of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of 4 transsacral screw constructs for posterior pelvic ring fixation, including one that uses a novel fixation method with a pair of locked washers with interdigitating cams. METHODS: Type C pelvic ring disruptions were created on 16 synthetic pelvis models. Each pelvis was fixated with an S2 screw in addition to being allocated to 1 of 4 transsacral constructs through S1: (1) 8.0-mm screw, (2) 8.0-mm bolt, (3) 8.0-mm screw locked with a nut, and (4) 8.00-mm screw locked with a nut with the addition of interdigitating washers between the screw head and ilium on the near cortex, and ilium and nut on the far cortex. The anterior ring fractures were not stabilized. Each pelvis underwent 100,000 cycles at 250 N and was then loaded to failure using a unilateral stance testing model. The anterior and posterior osteotomy sites were instrumented with pairs of infrared (IR) light-emitting markers, and the relative displacement of the markers was monitored using a three-dimensional (3D) motion capture system. Displacement measurements at 25,000; 50,000; 75,000; and 100,000 cycles and failure force were recorded for each pelvis. RESULTS: The novel washer design construct performed better than the screw construct with less posterior ring motion at 75,000 ( P = 0.029) and 100,000 cycles ( P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The novel interdigitating washer design may be superior to using a screw construct alone to achieve rigid, locked posterior ring fixation in a synthetic pelvis model with a Type C pelvic ring disruption.

Internal Joint Stabilizer: A Safe Treatment for Traumatic Elbow Instability.

OBJECTIVES: To report early results of the "Internal Joint Stabilizer of the Elbow" (IJS-E) in the treatment of terrible triad injuries and other unstable traumatic elbow dislocations. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen patients with traumatic elbow instability treated with IJS-E over a 2-year period; 7 of whom sustained terrible triad-type injuries. INTERVENTIONS: Open reduction internal fixation with the "IJS-E". MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Elbow stability and arc of motion were assessed radiographically and clinically. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were collected by telephone. RESULTS: All elbows were radiographically stable at the time of IJS-E removal. Mean time of follow-up was 9 months from index operation (range, 2.5-24 months). Mean elbow arc of motion was restored to flexion-extension 92 degrees (range, 5-125; SD, 31 degrees) and forearm pronation-supination 139 degrees (range, 0-180; SD, 48 degrees). Mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 22.2 (range, 7.5-45.7; SD, 13.3) for patients at least 1 month from surgery on the ipsilateral extremity. Five patients (30%) developed complications, and -2 (12%) required revision for implant failure. CONCLUSIONS: The IJS-E offered reliable treatment of traumatic elbow instability, particularly terrible triad-type injuries. It permited early range of motion and was effective in restoring elbow stability. We believe that the use of this relatively novel system should be further explored. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Low Risk of Wound Complications With Sinus Tarsi Approach for Treatment of Calcaneus Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Operative management displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures is commonly associated with wound complications. Open reduction internal fixation is traditionally performed through the extensile lateral approach has relatively high rates of wound complications. The sinus tarsi approach to displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures is a less invasive approach to achieve fracture reduction and fixation as well as reduce wound healing complications. The purpose of this study is to report the rates of wound complications associated with the sinus tarsi approach in the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients treated with a limited sinus tarsi approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures from January 2009 to December 2018. Demographic and radiographic data were collected including age, gender, mechanism of injury, occupation, presence of diabetes mellitus, smoking status, Sanders classification, Bohler and Gissane angles. Postoperatively, we recorded the presence of complications, return-to-work time, and radiographic measurements. RESULTS: One hundred and five fractures were identified in 100 patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures. Using the Sanders computed tomographic classification, we identified 32% Type 2, 48% Type 3, 18% Type 4, and 2% tongue-type variants. For the preoperative Bohler's angle, 38% of fractures displayed a negative angle, 50% had an angle 0° to 20°, and 12% over 20°. Postoperatively, all patients demonstrated an improvement in Bohler's angle with 13% with 0° to 20° and 87% over 20°. Approximately, 72% of patients working prior to the injury had returned to work by 6 months, and 89% by 12 months. The wound complication rate was 11.9% (12/105), with 1.9% (2/105) requiring additional procedures. There was no significant difference in wound complication rates in smokers versus nonsmokers (11.9% vs 12.2%, p = .55). CONCLUSION: Operative management of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures through the sinus tarsi approach allows restoration of calcaneal height with a low rate of wound complications, even among active smokers.

Acute Arthrodesis of Ipsilateral Pilon and Talus Fracture: A Case Report.

CASE: We report a unique case of an ipsilateral distal tibia pilon fracture and talar body after motor vehicle collision. Our patient was successfully treated with acute arthrodesis of the tibiotalar joint, with return to good function 1-year after surgery. CONCLUSION: Pilon and talus fractures are complex injuries. They require specialized surgical care, are complicated by loss of function, continued pain, and lead to subsequent reconstructive procedures such as arthrodesis or arthroplasty. In the presence of concomitant pilon and talus fractures, acute arthrodesis can yield good results and return to function.

A systematic review of ankle fracture treatment modalities in diabetic patients.

AIM: This systematic review evaluated the surgical outcomes of various ankle fracture treatment modalities in patients with Diabetes Mellitus as well as the methodological quality of the studies. METHODS: For our review, four online databases were searched: PubMed, MEDLINE (Clarivate Analytics), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health) and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics). The overall methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the Coleman Methodology Score. Data regarding diabetic ankle fractures were pooled into three outcomes groups for comparison: (1) the standard fixation cohort with management of diabetic ankle fractures using ORIF with small or mini fragment internal fixation techniques following AO principles, (2) the minimally invasive cohort with diabetic ankle fracture management utilizing percutaneous cannulated screws or intramedullary fixation, and (3) the combined construct cohort treated with a combination of ORIF and another construct (transarticular or external fixation). RESULTS: The search strategy identified 2228 potential studies from the four databases and 11 were included in the final review. Compared to the standard fixation cohort, the minimally invasive cohort had increased risk of hardware breakage or migration and the combined constructs cohort had increased risk of hardware breakage or migration, surgical site infection and nonunion. Limb salvage rates were similar for the standard fixation and minimally invasive cohorts; however, the combined constructs cohort had a significantly lower limb salvage rate compared to that of the standard fixation cohort. The mean Coleman Methodology Score indicated the quality of the studies in the review was poor and consistent with its limitations. DISCUSSION: The overall quality of published studies on operative treatment of diabetic ankle fractures is low. Treating diabetic ankle fractures operatively results in a high number of complications regardless of fixation method. However, limb salvage rates remain high overall at 97.9% at a mean follow-up of 21.7 months. To achieve improved limb salvage rates and decrease complications, it is critical is to follow basic AO principles, respect the soft tissue envelope or utilize minimally invasive techniques, and be wary that certain combined constructs may be associated with higher complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Increased Articular Exposure of the Lateral Tibial Plateau with a Midline Lateral Parapatellar Arthrotomy Compared to an Anterolateral Submeniscal Arthrotomy: a Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: To quantitatively compare the articular exposure of the proximal tibia with a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy through a straight midline incision (ML) versus a lateral submeniscal arthrotomy through a curvilinear anterolateral incision (AL). METHODS: Eight surgical approaches (4 ML and 4 AL) were performed on 4 fresh cadavers. Access to key articular landmarks was assessed, including divisions of the lateral meniscus, lateral tibial spine, and anterior cruciate ligament. The boundary of the exposed articular surface of the tibia was marked, and the proximal tibias were then stripped of soft tissues. A calibrated digital image was taken of each proximal tibia, and exposed articular surface area was calculated with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD). Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sample t-test. RESULTS: Average articular surface area exposed was 2.2 times greater through the midline approach compared with the anterolateral approach (11.2 vs 5.1 cm2, p = 0.010). All key anatomic landmarks were directly visualized through the midline approach in each specimen. Complete visualization of the lateral meniscus posterior horn, lateral tibial spine, and anterior cruciate ligament was not accomplished through the anterolateral approach in any specimen. CONCLUSIONS: The midline approach provides more extensive articular exposure of the lateral tibial plateau compared with the anterolateral approach. This improved exposure may offer an advantage when treating fractures not amenable to arthroscopic or minimally invasive techniques. It may be of most use when treating fractures with extension into the posteromedial quadrant of the lateral plateau, fractures with extensive comminution of the lateral plateau, or fractures with complex lateral meniscus tears and fractures with tibial spine involvement.

Increased articular exposure of the lateral elbow joint with the anconeus approach compared to the Kocher approach: a cadaver study.

INTRODUCTION: The Kocher approach is the workhorse approach to the lateral elbow. However, the exposure is often limited, particularly for open reduction. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively compare the articular exposure of the anconeus and Kocher approaches to the lateral elbow. METHODS: Eight surgical approaches (four Kocher and four Anconeus) were performed on four fresh cadavers. The right elbows of the first two specimens were dissected via the Kocher approach, and the left elbows via the anconeus approach. For the remaining two specimens, the laterality of the approaches was reversed. Access to key articular landmarks were assessed, including the capitellum, humeral trochlea, radial head, olecranon, coronoid process, and greater and lesser sigmoid notches of the ulna. A calibrated digital image was taken from the optimum surgeon's viewing angle of each approach, and these images were analyzed with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) to calculate the area of exposed articular surfaces. RESULTS: The average surface area exposed was 2.9 times greater with the anconeus approach compared with the standard Kocher approach (8.3 vs 3.1 cm2, p value 0.001). All key anatomic landmarks were directly visualized with the anconeus approach in each specimen. Visualization of the humeral trochlea, olecranon, coronoid process, and greater and lesser sigmoid notches of the ulna was not obtained in any of the Kocher approaches. DISCUSSION: The Anconeus approach provides superior exposure of the lateral elbow joint compared with the Kocher approach. We recommend consideration of the anconeus approach for treatment of select traumatic injuries of the lateral elbow requiring increased access to the ulnohumeral and radiocapitellar joints.

Does Size Matter for Cephalomedullary Nails in Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fractures?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the need for reoperation of geriatric intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with 10-mm cephalomedullary nails versus those treated with nails larger than 10 mm. DESIGN: Retrospective review at a single institution. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: All patients age 60 and over treated with cephalomedullary fixation for an intertrochanteric femur fracture at a single institution. INTERVENTION: Cephalomedullary fixation with variable nail diameters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Reoperation rates of geriatric intertrochanteric fractures treated with a size 10-mm diameter cephalomedullary nail compared with patients treated with nails larger than 10 mm. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in reoperation rates when the 10-mm cohort was compared with an aggregate cohort of all nails larger than 10 mm (P = 0.99). This result was true for both all-cause reoperation and noninfectious reoperation. There was no difference between cohorts in regards to age, gender, or fracture pattern. CONCLUSIONS: A 10-mm cephalomedullary nail can be used in lieu of a larger diameter fixation in patients age 60 and older with intertrochanteric femur fractures while still maintaining a comparable rate of reoperation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of Regional Anesthesia Timing on Pain, Opioid Use, and Postanesthesia Care Unit Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures.

Regional nerve blocks are an effective method of managing acute pain associated with surgery. The relative benefit of preoperative versus postoperative peripheral nerve blocks is not entirely clear. The primary aim of this study was to determine differences in pain scores in patients undergoing preoperative block versus postoperative block versus no block. We hypothesized that patients receiving preoperative blocks would have reduced pain scores and decreased opioid use in the immediate postoperative period. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 302 consecutive patients undergoing unilateral open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fracture under general anesthesia. We identified 3 groups: preoperative block, postoperative block, or no block. Data obtained from our electronic medical records included demographic information, postanesthesia care unit length of stay, pain scores obtained preoperatively, upon arrival to the postanesthesia care unit, and upon discharge from the postanesthesia care unit as well as intraoperative and postanesthesia care unit opioid utilization. Patients receiving preoperative block had significantly lower pain scores, less intraoperative or postanesthesia care unit opioid use, and shorter postanesthesia care unit dwell time compared with patients receiving postoperative block or no block. Preoperative popliteal sciatic and adductor canal blocks in patients undergoing ankle fracture surgery appears to be more effective than either postoperative block or no block.

Use of an Extensile Posterior Approach to the Elbow Joint: Early Results of the Anconeus Approach.

Commonly used surgical approaches to the elbow typically limit the surgeon to either medial or lateral exposure, can provide visualization limited by an intact radial head, and may not be extensile. We describe the use of a well recognized, but uncommonly used, extensile approach to the medial and lateral compartments of the elbow joint. This approach provides access to address pathology of the proximal radius, ulna, and the distal humerus and can be made extensile both proximally and distally. The anconeus approach is easy to perform and well tolerated by patients. A retrospective review of 42 patients is included.

Isolated Segmental Humeral Shaft Fracture Without Vascular Compromise Complicated by Brachial Compartment Syndrome: A Case Report.

CASE: We report an unusual case of a closed humeral shaft fracture, with no vascular compromise, resulting in brachial compartment syndrome. Our patient was successfully treated with fasciotomy and external fixation, followed by staged open reduction and internal fixation and skin grafting. CONCLUSION: Although uncommon in the upper arm, suspicion for compartment syndrome should remain high for patients with unrelieved pain and swelling after humeral shaft fracture. Serial physical examination and invasive monitoring can assist in the diagnosis. Fasciotomy and staged fracture repair can yield good results.

Trauma in the Diabetic Limb.

Poorly controlled diabetes with comorbid manifestations negatively affects outcomes in lower extremity trauma, increasing the risk of short-term and long-term complications. Management strategies of patients with diabetes that experience lower extremity trauma should also include perioperative management of hyperglycemia to reduce adverse and serious adverse events.

Significant Reduction of Pulmonary Embolism in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To report results of a protocol to lessen incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) among orthopaedic trauma patients. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENT/PARTICIPANTS: Orthopaedic trauma inpatients were included in the study. INTERVENTION: On arrival, an orthopaedic trauma patient's PE risk is calculated using a previously developed tool. If possible, patients at high risk are given their first dose of enoxaparin before leaving the emergency room. If other injuries preclude enoxaparin, then chemoprophylaxis is held for 24 hours. Twenty-four hours after arrival, the patient's ability to receive enoxaparin is reassessed. If possible, enoxaparin is started, with dosing twice a day. If enoxaparin is still contraindicated, a removable inferior vena cava filter is placed. Adequacy of enoxaparin dosing is tested using anti-factor Xa assay, drawn 4 hours after the third dose of enoxaparin. If the anti-factor Xa result is less than 0.2 IU/mL, a removable inferior vena cava filter is placed. If the result is 0.2-0.5 IU/mL, enoxaparin dosing is continued. If greater than 0.5 IU/mL, the dose of enoxaparin is reduced. OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure was rate of PE. RESULTS: From September 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, our hospital admitted 420 orthopaedic trauma patients. Fifty-one patients were classed as high risk for PE. In September through December 2015, 9 sustained PE, 1 of which was fatal. From September 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016, our hospital admitted 368 orthopaedic trauma patients with comparable age and Injury Severity Score to 2015. Forty patients were at high risk for PE, 1 sustained a nonfatal PE. PE incidence from September to December 2016 was significantly lower than in 2015 (P = 0.02). Overall, 26 patients managed under the new protocol had IVCFs placed, 21 had their filters removed, and 3 died with filters in place. There were no complications during filter placement or removal. One patient had hemorrhage felt to be attributable to enoxaparin. CONCLUSIONS: Our protocol emphasizes more robust enoxaparin dosing, and more frequent use of IVCF, but only among those at high risk. We lessened the incidence of PE, with a low complication rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

New concepts of radiologic preoperative evaluation of anterior shoulder instability: on-track and off-track lesions.

The shoulder is the most frequently dislocated joint in the body due to a larger range of motion and a small area of articulation between the humeral and glenoid surfaces. Traumatic shoulder dislocations, especially those associated with injury to the labroligamentous or bony stabilizers of the joint, lead to further reduction of articular surface contact with resultant glenohumeral instability and recurrent shoulder dislocations. Imaging plays an increasingly important role in the preoperative evaluation of patients with traumatic shoulder instability by evaluating glenohumeral bone loss (uni- or bipolar), assessing soft tissue injuries and identifying patients at risk of postoperative recurrence. Quantification of bone loss is key to differentiate engaging vs. non-engaging Hill-Sachs lesions, while newer concepts of "on-track" vs. "off-track" lesions are being discussed that can determine the required surgical approaches. In this article, we review the preoperative imaging approaches, traditional treatments, outline the bone loss measurement strategies and review these new tracking concepts with relevant case examples.

Transsacral-Transiliac Screw Stabilization: Effective for Recalcitrant Pain Due to Sacral Insufficiency Fracture.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures that fail nonoperative treatment. DESIGN: A pilot study series of consecutive patients identified over 5 years were treated and followed prospectively. SETTING: Academic-affiliated, tertiary referral, level 1 trauma center in Dallas, TX. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients were selected on the basis of presenting diagnosis, and failure of nonoperative treatment of their sacral insufficiency fracture. Eleven patients entered to the study, and 10 completed follow-up. INTERVENTION: Placement of transsacral-transiliac screws for sacral insufficiency fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Comparison of preoperative and postoperative Visual Analog Scale scores and Oswestry Low Back Disability Index scores. RESULTS: Patients experienced statistically significant improvement in both outcome measures after intervention. No complications encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Transsacral-transiliac screw fixation seems to be a safe and effective treatment for sacral insufficiency fractures recalcitrant to nonoperative management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.