Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil ; 37(3): e13209, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382915

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We investigated the prevalence of swallowing difficulties and associated factors in people with intellectual disability. METHODS: We included people aged 50+ receiving care for people with intellectual disabilities. The Dysphagia Disorder Survey (DDS) was used to assess swallowing difficulties. We determined the agreement between the DDS and swallowing difficulties in medical records. We used logistic regression analyses to explore associated factors. RESULTS: One thousand and fifty people were included. The prevalence of swallowing difficulties was 43.8%. Swallowing difficulties were not reported in the medical records of 83.3% of these cases. Frailty (odds ratio (OR) = 4.22, 95% CI = 2.05-8.71), mobility impairment (OR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.01-6.19), and mealtime dependency (OR = 3.05, 95% CI = 1.10-8.47) were independently associated with swallowing difficulties. CONCLUSION: Swallowing difficulties are prevalent in older people with intellectual disability but may be under-recognised. Frailty may be a good indicator for population-based screening for swallowing difficulties.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders , Frailty , Intellectual Disability , Humans , Aged , Intellectual Disability/epidemiology , Intellectual Disability/complications , Deglutition Disorders/epidemiology , Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis , Deglutition , Prevalence
3.
Public Health Rep ; 135(1_suppl): 182S-188S, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32735204

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the impact of a 2014 New York City health code change requiring laboratories to indicate if a patient is pregnant or probably pregnant in the electronic laboratory report (ELR) when reporting syphilis and hepatitis B virus (HBV) cases to the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH). METHODS: We calculated the number of pregnant persons with syphilis or HBV infection reported to DOHMH from January 1, 2013, through June 30, 2018. We compared the proportion in which the first report to DOHMH was an ELR with pregnancy indicated before and after the policy change. We calculated time between first ELR with pregnancy indicated and subsequent reporting by a method other than ELR and the proportion of cases in which ELR with pregnancy indicated was the only report source. RESULTS: A total of 552 new syphilis and 8414 HBV-infected cases were reported to DOHMH. From January 2013-June 2014 (pre-change) to January 2017-June 2018 (post-change), the proportion of cases in which ELR with pregnancy indicated was the first report to DOHMH increased significantly (14.7% [23/156] to 46.2% [80/173] for syphilis; 8.0% [200/2498] to 45.3% [851/1879] for HBV infection [P < .001]). Median time between first ELR with pregnancy indicated and subsequent reporting by a method other than ELR was 9.0 days for syphilis and 51.0 days for HBV infection. ELR with pregnancy indicated was the only report for 43.1% (238/552) of syphilis cases and 23.4% (1452/6200) of HBV cases during the study period. CONCLUSION: Including pregnancy status with ELR can increase the ability of public health departments to conduct timely interventions to prevent mother-to-child transmission.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Public Health Surveillance/methods , Syphilis/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , New York City , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Young Adult
4.
Health Secur ; 16(4): 252-261, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30133373

ABSTRACT

The New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) used multiple methods to provide guidance to healthcare providers on the management and prevention of Zika virus disease during 2016. To better understand providers' use of information sources related to emerging disease threats, this article describes reported use of information sources by NYC providers to stay informed about Zika, and patterns observed by provider type and practice setting. We sent an electronic survey to all email addresses in the Provider Data Warehouse, a system used to maintain information from state and local health department sources on all prescribing healthcare providers in NYC. The survey asked providers about their use of information sources, including specific information products offered by the NYC DOHMH, to stay informed about Zika during 2016. Trends by provider type and practice setting were described using summary statistics. The survey was sent to 44,455 unique email addresses; nearly 20% (8,711) of the emails were undeliverable. Ultimately, 1,447 (5.8%) eligible providers completed the survey. Most respondents (79%) were physicians. Overall, the most frequently reported source of information from the NYC DOHMH was the NYC Health Alert Network (73%). Providers in private practice reported that they did not use any NYC DOHMH source of information about Zika more frequently than did those working in hospital settings (29% vs 23%); similarly, private practitioners reported that they did not use any other source of information about Zika more frequently than did those working in hospital settings (16% vs 8%). Maintaining timely and accurate databases of healthcare provider contact information is a challenge for local public health agencies. Effective strategies are needed to identify and engage independently practicing healthcare providers to improve communications with all healthcare providers during public health emergencies.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Information Dissemination , Information Seeking Behavior , Zika Virus Infection , Communicable Diseases, Emerging , Humans , New York City , Public Health Practice , Surveys and Questionnaires , Zika Virus
5.
J Health Commun ; 22(3): 183-189, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28248625

ABSTRACT

This study explored the knowledge, attitudes, and perceived facilitators and barriers to adoption of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among black women and Latinas in the Bronx, NY. Data were collected in focus group discussions (FGDs) held separately with staff (n = 21) and black and Latina female clients aged 18 to 50 (n = 23) of four organizations providing health and social services. Participants were also asked to give feedback about four action messages regarding PrEP for a social marketing campaign. Transcripts were analyzed by two researchers using grounded theory. We found that the majority of clients (74%) and staff (57%) had not heard about PrEP before participating in the FGDs. Following brief educational messaging about PrEP, participants identified potential facilitators and barriers to PrEP uptake among women, and expressed enthusiasm for more widespread efforts to raise awareness about PrEP as an HIV prevention option. Participants preferred an action message that was brief, referred to PrEP as a pill, and did not mention condoms or STD testing. These findings demonstrate the need to raise awareness about PrEP among women and build the capacity of women-serving organizations to educate, screen, and refer or provide PrEP services.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/psychology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Promotion , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Adolescent , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Female , Focus Groups , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Health Communication/methods , Health Personnel/psychology , Health Services Accessibility , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Patient Preference/ethnology , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/statistics & numerical data , Qualitative Research , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
6.
Am J Ind Med ; 42(5): 397-402, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12382252

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vietnam is a rapidly industrializing country with increasing needs for building materials, including refractory bricks. The manufacture of refractory bricks results in high levels of free silica, a recognized occupational hazard. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 158 employees using a respiratory symptom questionnaire and ILO classification of radiographs for pneumoconiosis. RESULTS: The prevalence of radiographic silicosis (ILO category 1/0 and greater) was 10% in all workers with evidence of a dose-response gradient. Pneumoconiosis prevalence increased from 0% in workers employed < 10 years at the plant to 18% for workers employed > 20 years (trend test P = 0.01 for each year increment after adjusting for gender and tobacco use). CONCLUSIONS: Workers in this plant demonstrate a consistent pattern of radiographic evidence of pneumoconiosis, which appears to be related to duration of work. Future studies should assess exposure control measures that are appropriate to countries undergoing rapid industrialization such as Vietnam.


Subject(s)
Construction Materials/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure , Silicon Dioxide/adverse effects , Silicosis/epidemiology , Silicosis/etiology , Adult , Construction Materials/analysis , Developing Countries , Dust/analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Maximum Allowable Concentration , Prevalence , Radiography , Risk Assessment , Silicosis/diagnostic imaging , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Vietnam/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...