ABSTRACT
The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines program was developed to aid clinicians in the management of these complex patients, as well as to provide direction to policy makers and health care systems regarding related issues. The most recent comprehensive CCS AF guidelines update was published in 2010. Since then, periodic updates were published dealing with rapidly changing areas. However, since 2010 a large number of developments had accumulated in a wide range of areas, motivating the committee to complete a thorough guideline review. The 2020 iteration of the CCS AF guidelines represents a comprehensive renewal that integrates, updates, and replaces the past decade of guidelines, recommendations, and practical tips. It is intended to be used by practicing clinicians across all disciplines who care for patients with AF. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to evaluate recommendation strength and the quality of evidence. Areas of focus include: AF classification and definitions, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, screening and opportunistic AF detection, detection and management of modifiable risk factors, integrated approach to AF management, stroke prevention, arrhythmia management, sex differences, and AF in special populations. Extensive use is made of tables and figures to synthesize important material and present key concepts. This document should be an important aid for knowledge translation and a tool to help improve clinical management of this important and challenging arrhythmia.
Le programme de lignes directrices de la Société canadienne de cardiologie (SCC) en matière de fibrillation auriculaire (FA) a été élaboré pour aider les cliniciens à prendre en charge ces patients complexes, ainsi que pour orienter les décideurs politiques et les systèmes de soins de santé sur des questions connexes. La dernière édition complète des lignes directrices de la SCC en matière de FA a été publiée en 2010. Depuis lors, des mises à jour périodiques ont été publiées, traitant de domaines en évolution rapide. Cependant, en 2020, un grand nombre de développements s'y étaient ajoutés, couvrant un large éventail de domaines, ce qui a motivé le comité à créer une refonte complète des lignes directrices. L'édition 2020 des lignes directrices de la SCC en matière de FA représente un renouvellement complet qui intègre, met à jour et remplace les lignes directrices, les recommandations et les conseils pratiques des dix dernières années. Elle est destinée à être utilisée par les cliniciens praticiens de toutes les disciplines qui s'occupent de patients souffrant de FA. L'approche GRADE (Gradation des Recommandations, de l'Appréciation, du Développement et des Évaluations) a été utilisée pour évaluer la pertinence des recommandations et la qualité des résultats. Les domaines d'intérêt incluent : la classification et les définitions de la FA, son épidémiologie, sa physiopathologie, l'évaluation clinique, le dépistage de la FA, la détection et la gestion des facteurs de risque modifiables, l'approche intégrée de la gestion de la FA, la prévention des accidents vasculaires cérébraux, la gestion de l'arythmie, les différences entre les sexes et la FA dans des populations particulières. Des tableaux et figures ont été largement utilisés pour synthétiser les éléments importants et présenter les concepts clés. Ce document devrait représenter une aide importante pour l'intégration des connaissances et un outil pour aider à améliorer la gestion clinique de cette arythmie importante et difficile à traiter.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/classification , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Risk Groups , Algorithms , Sex Factors , Risk Factors , Critical Pathways , Stroke/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In approximately 10% of patients with implanted pacemakers or defibrillators, previously unrecognized atrial fibrillation (AF) is detected within 3â¯months. It is unknown whether elderly patients without implanted devices have a similar prevalence of undiagnosed AF using non-invasive ECG monitoring, and if this approach to screening in this population is cost-effective. METHODS: Individuals ≥80â¯years old attending outpatient clinics without a history of AF and with hypertension and one additional risk factor underwent 30â¯days of continuous ECG monitoring with an option for an additional 30â¯days of monitoring if no AF was detected. The primary outcome was AFâ¯≥â¯6â¯min. Cost-effectiveness to prevent stroke was estimated using a Markov model based on observed AF detection rates and data from the published literature. RESULTS: Among 129 patients enrolled, 100 initiated monitoring for an average duration of 36⯱â¯21â¯days. The proportion of patients that completed at least 30â¯days of monitoring was 59%. Average age was 84⯱â¯3â¯years and mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.5⯱â¯1.2. AFâ¯≥â¯6â¯min was documented in 14%, ≥6â¯h in 8%, and ≥24â¯h in 3%. One week of monitoring costed $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year-gained, 30â¯days and 60â¯days of monitoring costed $70,000 and $84,000, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous non-invasive ECG monitoring is feasible in elderly patients. Undiagnosed AF is present in many elderly individuals, with 1 in 7 having episodes lasting ≥6â¯min. One week of monitoring may be cost-effective for stroke prevention in this population.
