Optimizing Survival for Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Report and Current Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the leading primary liver tumor and a main indication for transplant. Transplant criteria are based on clinicopathologic features, meanwhile adequate downstaging and molecular mechanisms are getting more attention in evolving therapeutic algorithm of HCC. The aim of our study was to overview the results of the Hungarian Liver Transplant Program in the field of HCC and introduce new aspects of personalized treatment options. METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of survival and tumor recurrence of HCC-associated liver transplant recipients between October 2013 and December 2020. Patients were categorized in Milan criteria (MC), beyond MC but within University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), and beyond UCSF criteria groups after pathologic examination of the explanted liver. Demographic data and preoperative locoregional treatments were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 529 primer liver transplants were performed, 88 because of HCC. A total of 87 patients had underlying cirrhosis because of hepatitis C (54%), alcohol-related liver disease (33.7%), hepatitis B (4.5%), or unknown etiology. A total of 55.6% of the patients had at least one locoregional treatment. A total of 67.4% of the patients were within MC, 5.6% were within UCSF criteria, and 27% were beyond UCSF criteria. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 80%, 79%, and 75%. The outcome was better in early-stage tumors, but the difference was not significant (P = .745) CONCLUSIONS: The favorable survival in our department legitimates the strict transplant criteria of HCC. Adequate locoregional therapy as downstaging can expand recipient pool. Molecular tumor profiling may lead to personalized treatment of HCC.

Evolution of liver transplant waiting list in Hungary between 1995 and 2019. / Májvárólista 1995-2019: a hazai adatok nemzetközi összehasonlítása.

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: A májtranszplantációs program részeként 1995 óta létezik folyamatosan vezetett várólista Magyarországon. Célkituzés: A legfontosabb várólista-paraméterek megállapítása és nemzetközi összehasonlítása. Módszer: A szerzok az 1995. január 1. és 2019. december 31. között elso májátültetés céljából várólistára helyezett betegek adatait elemezték. Eredmények: Összesen 1722 beteget helyeztek várólistára, 1608 felnottet, 114 gyermeket. A férfiak aránya 51,2%, az átlagéletkor 45,6 év. Az évente regisztrált új jelöltek száma 25 év során közel az ötszörösére emelkedett. A listára helyezés leggyakoribb indikációja a víruseredetu cirrhosis volt (n = 451). Ezt követte a cholestaticus (n = 314) és az alkoholos májbetegség (n = 264). Rosszindulatú daganat, 82%-ban hepatocellularis carcinoma miatt 215 beteget regisztráltak. Krónikus betegségekben az átlagos Model for End-Stage Liver Disease pontszám a regisztráláskor 13,5 volt. A 2018. december 31-ig listára helyezettek (n = 1618) 61%-a részesült májátültetésben, 24%-a várakozás közben meghalt, 7%-a a mutétre alkalmatlanná vált. A mutét elotti medián várakozási ido 248 nap volt a krónikus és 2 nap az akut betegek listáján. A transzplantált tumoros betegek (n = 132) szignifikánsan rövidebb ideig vártak mutétre (medián 115,5 nap), mint a többi krónikus beteg (n = 803, medián 282 nap). Az Eurotransplanthoz való csatlakozás utáni idoszakban (2013. július 1. és 2018. december 31. között) a transzplantációs arány növekedett (67%), a várólista-halálozás (meghaltak + mutétre alkalmatlanná váltak) 24%-ra csökkent. Megbeszélés: A várólista folyamatos bovülése hozzájárult a hazai májátültetési program fejlodéséhez. A hazai várólista diagnózis szerinti összetétele a mások által közöltekkel nagyrészt egyezik. A transzplantáltak aránya a nemzetközi átlagnak megfelelo. A várólista-halálozás és a mutét elotti várakozási ido a magyarországinál alacsonyabb donációs aktivitású vagy jelentosen nagyobb várólistával rendelkezo országokéhoz hasonló. Következtetés: Várólista-paramétereink javításához a transzplantációk számának további növelése szükséges. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(8): 301-311. INTRODUCTION: The Hungarian liver transplant program including waiting list started in 1995. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the wait-list parameters and comparing them with those in the literature. METHOD: Data of patients listed for primary liver transplantation between 1995 and 2019 were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1722 recipient candidates were registered on the liver transplant waiting list: 1608 adults (51.2% men) with mean age of 45.6 year and 114 patients aged <18 year. Virus-induced cirrhosis was the leading indication of listing (n = 451) and cholestatic liver diseases (n = 314) and alcoholic cirrhosis (n = 264) thereafter. The mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 13.5 for those with chronic disease. 61% of 1618 patients listed before December 31, 2018 underwent liver transplantation and 31% were removed from the wait-list for death or clinical deterioration. After joining Eurotransplant (period of 01. 07. 2013-31. 12. 2018), the transplant rate was 67%, the waiting list removal due to death/too sick for operation decreased to 24%. The median waiting time till transplantation was 248 days for those on elective and 2 days on acute list. Patients grafted with malignancy (n = 132) waited significantly shorter time than those with chronic non-malignant liver disease (median 115.5 versus 282 days). DISCUSSION: The composition of our waiting list by primary liver disease was similar to that of countries with large burden of hepatitis C. Transplant rate was average, wait-list mortality and waiting time were in line with those observed in low-donation countries or in the case of large volume waiting list. CONCLUSION: Listing of increasing the number of patients contributed to evolution of our liver transplant program. To improve our parameters, increasing transplant activity is warranted. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(8): 301-311.

Guidance on the special care of liver or kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 / Az új koronavírus (SARS-CoV-2) okozta fertozésben szenvedo vese- és májátültetett betegek ellátásának speciális szempontjai. (A COVID-19-pandémia orvosszakmai kérdései)

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic caused by infection with the novel, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), transplant medicine also had to face a new, hitherto unknown challenge. To be prepared for any possibility, we consider it important to summarize the current knowledge regarding COVID-19 of liver and kidney transplant patients. Very early reports from Spanish and French registry recorded fatality rates of 18.6% and 13%, respectively, in renal patients which suggests a moderately worse outcome compared to the general population. In patients with positive PCR test but not showing clinical signs, the reduction of immunosuppression is not advised. In the case of gastrointestinal or respiratory signs with fever, the discontinuation of mycophenolate or mTOR inhibitors is recommended with decrease of the trough levels of calcineurin inhibitors to the lowest effective limit. Stop (kidney transplanted patients) or decrease (liver transplanted patients) immunosuppression and maintain corticosteroids when pulmonal injury develops and consider anti-IL1 and anti-IL6 monoclonal antibody use when hyperinflammatory syndrome is evolving. No proven effective treatment for SARS-CoV-2 exists currently. The use of lopinavir/ritonavir should be avoided because of the severe drug interaction with calcineurin inhibitors. The efficacy and tolerability of hidroxychloroquin remains to be also questionable; enroll patients into clinical trial with remdesivir or favipiravir if available. COVID-19 is characterized by virus-induced endothelial dysfunction, procoagulant state and renin-angiotensin-aldosteron system imbalance. Early thromboprofilaxis combination with low-molecular-weight heparin and low-dose aspirin is strongly recommended with the maintenance of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin-II-receptor blocker (ARB) therapy when they were prescribed earlier. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(32): 1310-1321.

Liver Transplant for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Center Experience in Hungary.

Unresectable liver metastases of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are an accepted indication for liver transplant. Patients undergoing liver transplant because of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases have similar long-term survival compared with hepatocellular carcinoma; however, recurrence rates are reported to be higher. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records of patients who received transplants for neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases in the Department of Transplantation and Surgery of Semmelweis University between January 1995 and August 2018. The median follow-up period was 33 months. RESULTS: Ten liver transplants have been performed because of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases during the observed period. Recurrence occurred in 5 cases, and 3 patients died. Estimated 1- and 5-year patient survival rates after transplant were 89% and 71%, respectively. Estimated 1- and 5-year recurrence-free rates were 80% and 43%, respectively. Every patient whose primary tumor was of pancreatic origin or those recipients who had Ki67 index values in the explanted liver higher than 5% had disease recurrence. CONCLUSION: Patient survival and recurrence rates after liver transplant were comparable with the results reported by other centers. In line with previous findings, primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and higher Ki67 index values in the explanted livers were both associated with higher recurrence rates. We believe that an international registry would be helpful to better understand factors leading to tumor recurrence in these cases.

Shear-wave elastography for the assessment of liver fibrosis in liver transplant recipients treated for hepatitis C virus recurrence.

OBJECTIVES: Direct-acting antiviral agents have revolutionized hepatitis C therapy, and are also found to be effective in the liver transplant setting. The extent of liver fibrosis influences patient management and is used to monitor therapeutic effects. Shear-wave elastography (SWE) is a relatively new imaging-based method that has not yet been studied extensively in liver transplant patients. Our aim was to study the effect of direct-acting antivirals in heaptitis C recurrence on liver stiffness determined by SWE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 23 liver transplant patients with hepatitis C recurrence were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients underwent 24 weeks of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir+dasabuvir±ribavirin combination therapy. Elastographic examinations, serological tests and laboratory tests were performed, and serum biomarkers of liver fibrosis were calculated the day before treatment (baseline) and at the end of the treatment. RESULTS: All our patients became hepatitis C virus RNA negative by the end of the treatment. Median liver stiffness values decreased significantly after treatment compared with baseline (8.72±3.77 vs. 7.19±2.4 kPa; P<0.001). Among the studied laboratory values, a significant decrease was observed in the levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and γ-glutamyltransferase, whereas international normalized ratio levels increased. Serum biomarkers, namely aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and Fibrosis-4, decreased significantly after treatment compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: In the present study, SWE was succesfully used to monitor the beneficial therapeutic effects of direct-acting antivirals in hepatitis C recurrence following liver transplantation. We believe that SWE is a useful noninvasive diagnostic tool in the follow-up of hepatitis C treatment in liver transplant patients.