Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Stem Cell Rev Rep ; 14(1): 125-140, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29064018

ABSTRACT

This study focuses on the interactions of human adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and malignant melanoma cells (MMCs) with regard to future cell-based skin therapies. The aim was to identify potential oncological risks as ADSCs could unintentionally be sited within the proximity of the tumor microenvironment of MMCs. An indirect co-culture model was used to analyze interactions between ADSCs and four different established melanoma cell lines (G-361, SK-Mel-5, MeWo and A2058) as well as two low-passage primary melanoma cell cultures (M1 and M2). Doubling time, migration and invasion, angiogenesis, quantitative real-time PCR of 229 tumor-associated genes and multiplex protein assays of 20 chemokines and growth factors and eight matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) were evaluated. Co-culture with ADSCs significantly increased migration capacity of G-361, SK-Mel-5, A2058, MeWo and M1 and invasion capacity of G-361, SK-Mel-5 and A2058 melanoma cells. Furthermore, conditioned media from all ADSC-MMC-co-cultures induced tube formation in an angiogenesis assay in vitro. Gene expression analysis of ADSCs and MMCs, especially of low-passage melanoma cell cultures, revealed an increased expression of various genes with tumor-promoting activities, such as CXCL12, PTGS2, IL-6, and HGF upon ADSC-MMC-co-culture. In this context, a significant increase (up to 5,145-fold) in the expression of numerous tumor-associated proteins could be observed, e.g. several pro-angiogenic factors, such as VEGF, IL-8, and CCL2, as well as different matrix metalloproteinases, especially MMP-2. In conclusion, the current report clearly demonstrates that a bi-directional crosstalk between ADSCs and melanoma cells can enhance different malignant properties of melanoma cells in vitro.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/metabolism , Melanoma/metabolism , Stem Cells/cytology , Stem Cells/metabolism , Cell Differentiation/physiology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Movement/physiology , Cell Proliferation/physiology , Chemokine CXCL12/genetics , Chemokine CXCL12/metabolism , Coculture Techniques , Cyclooxygenase 2/metabolism , Humans , Interleukin-6/metabolism , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Regenerative Medicine
2.
Stem Cell Res Ther ; 8(1): 121, 2017 05 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28545495

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In this study we evaluated the interactions of human adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and different human breast cancer cell lines (BRCAs) with regard to the safety of cell-assisted lipotransfers for breast reconstruction and a thereby unintended co-localization of ADSCs and BRCAs. METHODS: ADSCs were co-cultured with five different human BRCAs (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3, ZR-75-30, and EVSA-T) and primary BRCAs from one patient in a transwell system, and cell-cell-interactions were analyzed by assessing doubling time, migration and invasion, angiogenesis, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of more than 300 tumor-associated genes, and multiplex protein assays of 20 chemokines and growth factors and eight matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Results of co-culture were compared to those of the respective monoculture. RESULTS: Quantitative real-time PCR revealed remarkable changes in the expression of multiple tumor-associated genes in co-culture compared to monocultures of both ADSCs and BRCAs. Concomitantly, the concentration of several tumor-associated proteins, such as cytokines and MMPs, were strongly increased in co-culture. Furthermore, exclusively in co-culture with ADSCs, the different BRCAs were exposed to several important tumor-modulating proteins, such as CCL2, HGF, or interleukins. Co-culture did not significantly affect cellular proliferation of either ADSCs or BRCAs (p > 0.05). The migration of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 BRCAs was significantly increased in co-culture with ADSCs by a mean of 11% and 23%, respectively (p = 0.04 and 0.012), as well as that of ADSCs in co-culture with MDA-MB-231, ZR-75-30, and EVSA-T (+11-15%, p = 0.035-0.045). Co-culture with MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3, and EVSA-T BRCAs significantly increased the invasive behavior of ADSCs by a mean of 24-41% (p = 0.014-0.039). There were no significant differences in the in vitro invasive properties of BRCAs in co-culture compared to monoculture. An in vitro angiogenesis assay revealed an increased tube formation of conditioned media from co-cultured BRCAs and ADSCs compared to the respective monocultures. CONCLUSION: This study further elucidates the possible interactions of primary human ADSCs with human BRCAs, pointing towards a potential increased oncological risk which should not be neglected when considering a clinical use of cell-assisted lipoaspirates in breast reconstruction.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/cytology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Lipids/chemistry , Mammaplasty , Stem Cell Transplantation , Stem Cells/cytology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Differentiation , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Movement/genetics , Cell Proliferation , Coculture Techniques , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells , Humans , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Neovascularization, Physiologic
3.
Virology ; 395(2): 243-54, 2009 Dec 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19854461

ABSTRACT

Major strategies to increase oncolytic adenovirus efficacy, as required for clinical applications, are enhancing oncolysis by acceleration of virus release/spread and "arming" by insertion of therapeutic genes. We investigated whether these strategies can be effectively combined as it has been speculated that the arming approach rather benefits from delayed cell lysis and extended time for protein synthesis. We report that deleting adenoviral E1B19K results in an apoptosis-dependent early viral release and thus enhanced oncolysis in several tumor cells, but inhibits virus replication in others. In the former case, apoptosis induction and early cell lysis did not interfere with late transgene expression. Thus, transgene expression was dramatically increased over time due to better virus spread. In A549 cells, transgene expression by the E1B19K(-) virus at 5 days post-infection was higher than for the E1B19K(+) virus at 10 days. These properties may be of critical importance in patients, where time for virus spread is limited.


Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/metabolism , Adenoviridae/physiology , Carrier Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Viral/physiology , Viral Proteins/metabolism , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/genetics , Apoptosis , Carrier Proteins/genetics , Gene Deletion , Organisms, Genetically Modified , Viral Proteins/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...