A Novel Subcutaneous Furosemide Formulation for Outpatient Management of Heart Failure.

In patients with fluid overload and congestion, parenteral diuretic therapy is frequently utilized. However, administration of parenteral diuretic therapy commonly requires hospital admission or outpatient clinic visits. Furoscix (scPharmaceuticals, Burlington, MA), a subcutaneous formulation of furosemide designed for home use, offers new treatment possibilities with the potential for profound cost savings for patients and health systems. Currently, subcutaneous furosemide formulations have been studied in palliative care populations and outpatient clinics, however, new literature has evaluated utility in prescribing on discharge from the emergency department. This review aims to describe the pharmacokinetic profile and utilization of subcutaneous furosemide for treatment of congestion in patients with heart failure.

Utilization and safety of off-label prothrombin complex concentrate (four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate) in a surgical population.

The aim of this study is to evaluate and describe the utilization and safety of 4F-PCC in a nonanticoagulated, surgical patient population at an academic, tertiary care center. This retrospective, single-center chart review evaluated nonanticoagulated adult patients at least 18 years of age who had at least one dose of 4F-PCC administered between 1 January 2017 and 30 September 2022 for a surgical or peri-procedural indication. Hemostatic efficacy following 4F-PCC administration was the primary outcome, assessed by subsequent blood product administration and hemoglobin and hematocrit reduction. Secondary outcomes included an assessment of thrombotic events within 30 days post-4F-PCC administration, in-hospital mortality, and the length of hospital stay. A total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 61 patients receiving 4F-PCC for cardiac surgery and 10 patients for other intraoperative or peri-procedural indications. The mean total 4F-PCC dose was 25.0 U/kg. For the primary outcome of hemostatic efficacy, 81% of patients had excellent hemostasis; however, blood product administration was reported in 95.8% of patients post-4F-PCC. Thromboembolic events occurred in 10 (14.1%) patients and 21.1% of patients expired prior to discharge in the total cohort. Off-label 4F-PCC use in nonanticoagulated patients is reported despite a lack of robust guidance for use. Following 4F-PCC administration, hemostatic efficacy based on hemoglobin and hematocrit changes was observed; however, blood product use was frequent, and 4F-PCC administration was not without risks, including thromboembolic complications such deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, and stroke. Further studies are needed to validate the off-label administration of 4F-PCC in nonanticoagulated patients.

Utilization and safety of off-label prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in a nonsurgical population.

The aim of this study was to evaluate and describe the utilization and safety of 4F-PCC in a nonanticoagulated, nonsurgical patient population at an academic, tertiary care center. This retrospective, single-center chart review evaluated nonanticoagulated adult patients at least 18 years of age who had at least one dose of 4F-PCC administered between January 1, 2017, and September 30, 2022, for a nonsurgical indication. Hemostatic efficacy following 4F-PCC administration was the primary outcome, and secondary outcomes included an assessment of blood product administration, thrombotic events within 30 days post4F-PCC administration, in-hospital mortality, and the length of hospital stay. A total of 59 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 10 patients received 4F-PCC for coagulopathy associated with liver disease, 34 for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and 15 for other indications. For the primary outcome of hemostatic efficacy, 17 non-ICH patients (85%) had achieved hemostasis post-4F-PCC, and among the ICH patient population, 18 (64%) did not show expansion on repeat CT post4F-PCC, suggesting hemostasis. Blood product and hemostatic agent usage was frequent, with 72.9% of patients requiring products post-4F-PCC. Acute thromboembolic events occurred in six patients (10.2%), and in-hospital mortality occurred in 55.9% of patients. Off-label 4F-PCC use is common despite a lack of robust guidance for use. Following 4F-PCC administration, blood product use was frequent, the incidence of in-hospital mortality was high, and thromboembolic complications such deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and stroke were reported. Further studies are needed to validate the off-label administration of 4F-PCC in nonanticoagulated patients.

Intravenous iron in patients with iron deficiency and heart failure: a review of modern evidence.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Iron deficiency is common in patients with heart failure, affecting up to half of ambulatory patients and an even greater percentage of patients admitted for acute decompensation. Iron deficiency in this population is also associated with poor outcomes, including worse quality of life in addition to increased hospitalizations for heart failure and mortality. Evidence suggests that patients with iron deficiency in heart failure may benefit from repletion with IV iron. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we outline the etiology and pathophysiology of iron deficiency in heart failure as well as various iron formulations available. We discuss evidence for intravenous iron repletion with a particular focus on recent studies that have evaluated its effects on hospitalizations and mortality. Finally, we discuss areas of uncertainty and future study and provide practical guidance for iron repletion. SUMMARY: In summary, there is overwhelming evidence that intravenous iron repletion in patients with iron deficiency in heart failure is both beneficial and safe. However, further evidence is needed to better identify which patients would most benefit from iron repletion as well as the ideal repletion strategy.