Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 8(6): e66645, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23826108

ABSTRACT

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is one of the most economically important swine pathogens, which causes reproductive failure in sows and respiratory disease in piglets. A major hurdle to control PRRSV is the ineffectiveness of the current vaccines to confer protection against heterologous strains. Since both GP4 and M genes of PRRSV induce neutralizing antibodies, in this study we molecularly bred PRRSV through DNA shuffling of the GP4 and M genes, separately, from six genetically different strains of PRRSV in an attempt to identify chimeras with improved heterologous cross-neutralizing capability. The shuffled GP4 and M genes libraries were each cloned into the backbone of PRRSV strain VR2385 infectious clone pIR-VR2385-CA. Three GP4-shuffled chimeras and five M-shuffled chimeras, each representing sequences from all six parental strains, were selected and further characterized in vitro and in pigs. These eight chimeric viruses showed similar levels of replication with their backbone strain VR2385 both in vitro and in vivo, indicating that the DNA shuffling of GP4 and M genes did not significantly impair the replication ability of these chimeras. Cross-neutralization test revealed that the GP4-shuffled chimera GP4TS14 induced significantly higher cross-neutralizing antibodies against heterologous strains FL-12 and NADC20, and similarly that the M-shuffled chimera MTS57 also induced significantly higher levels of cross-neutralizing antibodies against heterologous strains MN184B and NADC20, when compared with their backbone parental strain VR2385 in infected pigs. The results suggest that DNA shuffling of the GP4 or M genes from different parental viruses can broaden the cross-neutralizing antibody-inducing ability of the chimeric viruses against heterologous PRRSV strains. The study has important implications for future development of a broadly protective vaccine against PRRSV.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Genes, Viral , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/immunology , Animals , Antibodies, Neutralizing/genetics , Base Sequence , Cell Line , DNA, Complementary , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/classification , Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid , Swine
2.
J Virol Methods ; 193(2): 278-83, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23773809

ABSTRACT

Swine hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a zoonotic virus and pigs are considered as an important reservoir. Swine HEV infection is widespread and most pig herds are infected. Humans can be infected with swine HEV via consumption of undercooked pork or through direct contact with infected pigs. To minimize the risk of zoonotic transmission, sensitive tools to assess the HEV infection status of pigs and pork products are needed. The objective of this study was to develop a fluorescent microbead-based immunoassay (FMIA) for the detection of IgG antibodies against swine HEV and compare it to an in-house enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). Three sets of samples were utilized: (A) samples from pigs infected experimentally with different strains of HEV (positive controls, n=72), (B) samples from known HEV-negative pigs (negative controls, n=62) and (C) samples from pigs of unknown HEV infection status (n=182). All samples were tested by both ELISA and FMIA. The results on the experimental samples with known HEV exposure indicate that both assays have a specificity of 100% while the sensitivity ranges from 84.6% (ELISA) to 92.3% (FMIA). The overall prevalence of HEV IgG antibodies in field samples from pigs with unknown HEV exposure was 21.9% (40/182) for the ELISA and 21.4% (39/182) for the FMIA. The two assays had an almost perfect overall agreement (Kappa=0.92).


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Hepatitis E virus/immunology , Hepatitis E/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunologic Tests/methods , Animals , Fluorescence , Immunoassay/methods , Microspheres , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine
3.
Virology ; 434(1): 96-109, 2012 Dec 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23051709

ABSTRACT

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is an important swine pathogen. Here we applied the DNA shuffling approaches to molecularly breed the PRRSV GP3 gene, a neutralizing antibodies inducer, in an attempt to improve its heterologous cross-neutralizing ability. The GP3 genes of six different PRRSV strains were bred by traditional DNA shuffling. Additionally, synthetic DNA shuffling of the GP3 gene was also performed using degenerate oligonucleotides. The shuffled-GP3-libraries were cloned into the backbone of a DNA-launched PRRSV infectious clone pIR-VR2385-CA. Four traditional-shuffled chimeras each representing all 6 parental strains and four other synthetic-shuffled chimeras were successfully rescued. These chimeras displayed similar levels of replication both in vitro and in vivo, compared to the backbone parental virus, indicating that the GP3 shuffling did not impair the replication capability of the chimeras. One chimera GP3TS22 induced significantly higher levels of cross-neutralizing antibodies in pigs against a heterologous PRRSV strain FL-12.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , DNA Shuffling , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/genetics , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/immunology , Viral Structural Proteins/drug effects , Viral Structural Proteins/immunology , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Base Sequence , Cell Line , Cross Reactions , Disease Models, Animal , Genotype , Molecular Sequence Data , Neutralization Tests , Phylogeny , Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/virology , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/classification , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/physiology , Swine , Viral Load , Virus Replication
4.
Vaccine ; 30(44): 6249-55, 2012 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22906724

ABSTRACT

Hepatitis E virus (HEV), the causative agent of hepatitis E, is primarily transmitted via the fecal-oral route through contaminated water supplies, although many sporadic cases of hepatitis E are transmitted zoonotically via direct contact with infected animals or consumption of contaminated animal meats. Genotypes 3 and 4 HEV are zoonotic and infect humans and other animal species, whereas genotypes 1 and 2 HEV are restricted to humans. There exists a single serotype of HEV, although the cross-protective ability among the animal HEV strains is unknown. Thus, in this study we expressed and characterized N-terminal truncated ORF2 capsid antigens derived from swine, rat, and avian HEV strains and evaluated their cross-protective ability in a pig challenge model. Thirty, specific-pathogen-free, pigs were divided into 5 groups of 6 pigs each, and each group of pigs were vaccinated with 200 µg of swine HEV, rat HEV, or avian HEV ORF2 antigen or PBS buffer (2 groups) as positive and negative control groups. After a booster dose immunization at 2 weeks post-vaccination, the vaccinated animals all seroconverted to IgG anti-HEV. At 4 weeks post-vaccination, the animals were intravenously challenged with a genotype 3 mammalian HEV, and necropsied at 4 weeks post-challenge. Viremia, fecal virus shedding, and liver histological lesions were compared to assess the protective and cross-protective abilities of these antigens against HEV challenge in pigs. The results indicated that pigs vaccinated with truncated recombinant capsid antigens derived from three animal strains of HEV induced a strong IgG anti-HEV response in vaccinated pigs, but these antigens confer only partial cross-protection against a genotype 3 mammalian HEV. The results have important implications for the efficacy of current vaccines and for future vaccine development, especially against the novel zoonotic animal strains of HEV.


Subject(s)
Cross Protection , Hepatitis E/prevention & control , Viral Hepatitis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Viral Hepatitis Vaccines/immunology , Animals , Birds , Capsid Proteins/genetics , Capsid Proteins/immunology , Disease Models, Animal , Feces/virology , Genotype , Hepatitis Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis E/immunology , Hepatitis E virus/genetics , Hepatitis E virus/immunology , Hepatitis E virus/isolation & purification , Histocytochemistry , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Liver/pathology , Rats , Swine , Vaccination/methods , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Viremia/prevention & control , Virus Shedding
5.
J Gen Virol ; 93(Pt 8): 1687-1695, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22535776

ABSTRACT

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an important human pathogen. In addition to humans, HEV has also been identified in pig, chicken, mongoose, deer, rat, rabbit and fish. There are four recognized and two putative genotypes of mammalian HEV. Genotypes 1 and 2 are restricted to humans, while genotypes 3 and 4 are zoonotic. The recently identified rabbit HEV is a distant member of genotype 3. Here, we first expressed and purified the recombinant capsid protein of rabbit HEV and showed that the capsid protein of rabbit HEV cross-reacted with antibodies raised against avian, rat, swine and human HEV. Conversely, we showed that antibodies against rabbit HEV cross-reacted with capsid proteins derived from chicken, rat, swine and human HEV. Since pigs are the natural host of genotype 3 HEV, we then determined if rabbit HEV infects pigs. Twenty pigs were divided into five groups of four each and intravenously inoculated with PBS, US rabbit HEV, Chinese rabbit HEV, US rat HEV and swine HEV, respectively. Results showed that only half of the pigs inoculated with rabbit HEV had low levels of viraemia and faecal virus shedding, indicative of active but not robust HEV infection. Infection of pigs by rabbit HEV was further verified by transmission of the virus recovered from pig faeces to naïve rabbits. Pigs inoculated with rat HEV showed no evidence of infection. Preliminary results suggest that rabbit HEV is antigenically related to other HEV strains and infects pigs and that rat HEV failed to infect pigs.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis E virus/genetics , Hepatitis E/veterinary , Swine Diseases/virology , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antigens, Viral/immunology , China/epidemiology , Feces/virology , Hepatitis E/blood , Hepatitis E/epidemiology , Hepatitis E/virology , Hepatitis E virus/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , RNA, Viral/genetics , Rabbits , Rats , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Species Specificity , Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms , Swine , Swine Diseases/blood , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
6.
Virus Res ; 159(1): 17-22, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21536085

ABSTRACT

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an important human pathogen. At least four recognized and two putative genotypes of mammalian HEV have been reported: genotypes 1 and 2 are restricted to humans whereas genotypes 3 and 4 are zoonotic. The current experimental vaccines are all based on a single strain of HEV, even though multiple genotypes of HEV are co-circulating in some countries and thus an individual may be exposed to more than one genotype. Genotypes 3 and 4 swine HEV is widespread in pigs and known to infect humans. Therefore, it is important to know if prior infection with a genotype 3 swine HEV will confer protective immunity against subsequent exposure to genotypes 3 and 4 human and swine HEV. In this study, specific-pathogen-free pigs were divided into 4 groups of 6 each. Pigs in the three treatment groups were each inoculated with a genotype 3 swine HEV, and 12 weeks later, challenged with the same genotype 3 swine HEV, a genotype 3 human HEV, and a genotype 4 human HEV, respectively. The control group was inoculated and challenged with PBS buffer. Weekly sera from all pigs were tested for HEV RNA and IgG anti-HEV, and weekly fecal samples were also tested for HEV RNA. The pigs inoculated with swine HEV became infected as evidenced by fecal virus shedding and viremia, and the majority of pigs also developed IgG anti-HEV prior to challenge at 12 weeks post-inoculation. After challenge, viremia was not detected and only two pigs challenged with swine HEV had 1-week fecal virus shedding, suggesting that prior infection with a genotype 3 swine HEV prevented pigs from developing viremia and fecal virus shedding after challenges with homologous and heterologous genotypes 3 and 4 HEV. The results from this study have important implications for future development of an effective HEV vaccine.


Subject(s)
Cross Protection , Hepatitis E virus/immunology , Hepatitis E/immunology , Hepatitis E/veterinary , Swine Diseases/immunology , Swine Diseases/prevention & control , Animals , Genotype , Hepatitis Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis E/prevention & control , Hepatitis E virus/classification , Hepatitis E virus/genetics , Hepatitis E virus/isolation & purification , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , RNA, Viral/blood , Serum/immunology , Serum/virology , Swine , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...