Evaluation of Recovery Efficacy of Inspiratory Muscle Training After Lobectomy Based on Computed Tomography 3D Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Progressive resistance inspiratory muscle training is the principle of inspiratory air-flow resistance loading training to restore diaphragm function, increase alveolar compliance, and further improve respiratory function. However, there is a lack of research on the effectiveness of progressive resistance inspiratory training in post-lobectomy rehabilitation and the accurate assessment of lung volumes. METHODS: In this study, 79 subjects diagnosed with lung cancer and undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The subjects were divided into a control group (n = 40) and an observation group (n =39) according to the different training modalities. The control group received conventional respiratory training. The observation group received progressive resistance inspiratory muscle training based on conventional breathing training. The primary outcome indicators were the following: lung function and lung volume. The secondary outcome indicators were the following: the number of postoperative hospital days, duration of drain retention, and incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. RESULTS: Baseline data on age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, education level, underlying disease, type of pathology, lung cancer stages, surgical site, preoperative lung volume, and preoperative lung function were not statistically different between the 2 groups (P > .05). The subjects in the observation group had median (interquartile range [IQR]) lung volumes at 1 month after surgery (3.22 [3.12-3.37] L vs 3.14 [2.95-3.24] L; P = .031), median (IQR) FEV1 (2.11 [1.96-2.21] L vs 2.01 [1.81-2.12] L; P = .031), and mean ± SD peak expiratory flow (5.07 ± 0.62 L/s vs 4.66 ± 0.64 L/s; P = .005) were higher than those in the control group. The median (IQR) postoperative hospital stays (5 [4-5] d vs 5 [4-6] d; P = .030) and the median (IQR) chest drain retention times were shorter in the observation group versus the control group (74 [72-96] h vs 96 [84-96] h; P = .02). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative atelectasis (5.1% vs 10.0%; P = .41) and pneumonia (7.7% vs 12.5%; P = .48). CONCLUSIONS: Progressive resistance inspiratory muscle training was effective in improving lung volume and lung function, and in reducing the length of hospital stay and chest drain closure time after lobectomy.

Effect of mindfulness-based mind-body therapies in patients with non-specific low back pain-A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background/objectives: Although mindfulness-based mind-body therapy (MBMBT) is an effective non-surgical treatment for patients with non-specific low back pain (NLBP), the best MBMBT mode of treatment for NLBP patients has not been identified. Therefore, a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the effects of different MBMBTs in the treatment of NLBP patients. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) applying MBMBT for the treatment of NLBP patients, with all of the searches ranging from the time of database creation to January 2023. After 2 researchers independently screened the literature, extracted information, and evaluated the risks of biases in the included studies, the data were analyzed by using Stata 16.0 software. Results: A total of 46 RCTs were included, including 3,886 NLBP patients and 9 MBMBT (Yoga, Ayurvedic Massage, Pilates, Craniosacral Therapy, Meditation, Meditation + Yoga, Qigong, Tai Chi, and Dance). The results of the NMA showed that Craniosacral Therapy [surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA): 99.2 and 99.5%] ranked the highest in terms of improving pain and disability, followed by Other Manipulations (SUCRA: 80.6 and 90.8%) and Pilates (SUCRA: 54.5 and 71.2%). In terms of improving physical health, Craniosacral Therapy (SUCRA: 100%) ranked the highest, followed by Pilates (SUCRA: 72.3%) and Meditation (SUCRA: 55.9%). In terms of improving mental health, Craniosacral Therapy (SUCRA: 100%) ranked the highest, followed by Meditation (SUCRA: 70.7%) and Pilates (SUCRA: 63.2%). However, in terms of improving pain, physical health, and mental health, Usual Care (SUCRA: 7.0, 14.2, and 11.8%, respectively) ranked lowest. Moreover, in terms of improving disability, Dance (SUCRA: 11.3%) ranked lowest. Conclusion: This NMA shows that Craniosacral Therapy may be the most effective MBMBT in treating NLBP patients and deserves to be promoted for clinical use. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, PROSPERO [CRD42023389369].