Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage in Primary Versus Secondary Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) occurs in patients with both primary and secondary antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS). We sought to determine the differences in clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of DAH in these patients. METHODS: We performed a medical records review study and reviewed 30 patients with DAH in the setting of primary and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome seen at our institution between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2018. We analyzed their demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory values, imaging studies, lung pathology results, management, and outcomes. RESULTS: The patients in the secondary APS cohort were younger (median age, 48.5 vs 58 years) and comprised more females (75% vs 17%) compared with those with primary APS (p < 0.05). Two thirds of patients in the secondary APS group were anemic compared with less than one fourth in the primary APS group (p = 0.005). At the time of the first episode of DAH, the patients in the secondary APS required invasive and noninvasive ventilation, antibiotics, and combination immunosuppressive therapy (includes a combination of glucocorticoids with immunosuppressants or intravenous immunoglobulins or plasma exchange) more often compared with those with primary APS. There was only one in-hospital death (3% in-hospital mortality). One-year and 5-year mortality rates were 20% and 27%, respectively, with no significant difference between the primary and secondary APS groups. CONCLUSIONS: Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage in the setting of APS, especially secondary APS, can be severe. However, in-hospital mortality is uncommon with current management strategies.

A Systematic Review of Preexisting Sepsis and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

We retrospectively reviewed all pertinent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) studies (January 1995 to September 2017) of adults with sepsis as a primary indication for intervention and its association with morbidity and mortality. Collected data included study type, ECMO configuration, outcomes, effect size, and other features. Advanced age was a risk factor for death. Compared with nonsurvivors, survivors had a lower median Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment score on day 3 (15 vs. 18, p = 0.01). Biomarkers in survivors and nonsurvivors, respectively, were peak lactate (from two studies: 4.5 vs. 15.1 mmol/L, p = 0.03; 3.6 ± 3.7 vs. 3.3 ± 2.4 mmol/L, p = 0.850) and procalcitonin levels (41 vs. 164 ng/ml, p = 0.008). Bacteremia was associated with catheter colonization, and 90.5% of a group without bloodstream infections survived to discharge; ECMO weaning was possible for less than half the bloodstream infection group. Myocarditis portended favorable outcomes for patients with sepsis who received ECMO. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used in immunosuppressed patients with refractory cardiopulmonary insufficiency from severe sepsis with successful weaning from ECMO for most patients. Overall survival varied substantially among studies (15.38-71.43%). Existing studies do not present well-defined patterns supporting use of ECMO in sepsis because of sample sizes and disparate study designs.