ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Mastectomy is still one of the standard alternative procedures for the management of female breast cancer. Axillary node dissection is also performed to establish the accurate staging. After operation, the axilla must be drained because of lymphatic leakage. Whether the raw surface at the pectoral area should be drained or not is an interesting controversial point. The authors conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes after modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with and without drainage at the pectoral area. METHODS: Sixty patients who agreed to be treated with MRM and had given their consent were enrolled. Mastectomy was performed to remove the breast tissue proper by scalpel in order to minimize tissue injury. The axillary contents were removed by sharp instrument. After bleeding had stopped, patients were randomly allocated to one or other of 2 groups: group I (n = 30): only 1 drain was inserted at the axilla area; group II (n = 30): 2 conventional drains were inserted into the pectoral area and axilla area. The size of tube drain and negative suction pressure were constant in all cases. Volume of contents was recorded daily. Subcutaneous seroma or hematoma were carefully observed and confirmed by ultrasonography 3-5 days after operation. Overall drainage contents and complications were compared. RESULTS: The mean weight of breast tissue of group I was 632.1 g and group II 654.0 g (p = 0.81). Total drainage contents (median) from the two groups were 250 cm3 and 231 cm3 respectively (p = 0.796). Complications occurred in 1 case in group I and 2 cases in group II (p = 0.35). None of the above differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Mastectomy by scalpel can be performed without drainage at the pectoral area. Overall complications in the conventional group and the group without drain did not differ significantly.
