On the accuracy and precision of X-ray and neutron diffraction results as a function of resolution and the electron density model.

X-ray diffraction is the main source of three-dimensional structural information. In total, more than 1.5 million crystal structures have been refined and deposited in structural databanks (PDB, CSD and ICSD) to date. Almost 99.7% of them were obtained by approximating atoms as spheres within the independent atom model (IAM) introduced over a century ago. In this study, X-ray datasets for single crystals of hydrated α-oxalic acid were refined using several alternative electron density models that abandon the crude spherical approximation: the multipole model (MM), the transferable aspherical atom model (TAAM) and the Hirshfeld atom refinement (HAR) model as a function of the resolution of X-ray data. The aspherical models (MM, TAAM, HAR) give far more accurate and precise single-crystal X-ray results than IAM, sometimes identical to results obtained from neutron diffraction and at low resolution. Hence, aspherical approaches open new routes for improving existing structural information collected over the last century.

Yes, one can obtain better quality structures from routine X-ray data collection.

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction structural results for benzidine dihydrochloride, hydrated and protonated N,N,N,N-peri(dimethylamino)naphthalene chloride, triptycene, dichlorodimethyltriptycene and decamethylferrocene have been analysed. A critical discussion of the dependence of structural and thermal parameters on resolution for these compounds is presented. Results of refinements against X-ray data, cut off to different resolutions from the high-resolution data files, are compared to structural models derived from neutron diffraction experiments. The Independent Atom Model (IAM) and the Transferable Aspherical Atom Model (TAAM) are tested. The average differences between the X-ray and neutron structural parameters (with the exception of valence angles defined by H atoms) decrease with the increasing 2θmax angle. The scale of differences between X-ray and neutron geometrical parameters can be significantly reduced when data are collected to the higher, than commonly used, 2θmax diffraction angles (for Mo Kα 2θmax > 65°). The final structural and thermal parameters obtained for the studied compounds using TAAM refinement are in better agreement with the neutron values than the IAM results for all resolutions and all compounds. By using TAAM, it is still possible to obtain accurate results even from low-resolution X-ray data. This is particularly important as TAAM is easy to apply and can routinely be used to improve the quality of structural investigations [Dominiak (2015 ▸). LSDB from UBDB. University of Buffalo, USA]. We can recommend that, in order to obtain more adequate (more accurate and precise) structural and displacement parameters during the IAM model refinement, data should be collected up to the larger diffraction angles, at least, for Mo Kα radiation to 2θmax = 65° (sin θmax/λ < 0.75 Å(-1)). The TAAM approach is a very good option to obtain more adequate results even using data collected to the lower 2θmax angles. Also the results of translation-libration-screw (TLS) analysis and vibrational entropy values are more reliable for 2θmax > 65°.

Statistical analysis of multipole-model-derived structural parameters and charge-density properties from high-resolution X-ray diffraction experiments.

A comprehensive analysis of various properties derived from multiple high-resolution X-ray diffraction experiments is reported. A total of 13 charge-density-quality data sets of α-oxalic acid dihydrate (C2H2O4·2H2O) were subject to Hansen-Coppens-based modelling of electron density. The obtained parameters and properties were then statistically analysed yielding a clear picture of their variability across the different measurements. Additionally, a computational approach (CRYSTAL and PIXEL programs) was utilized to support and examine the experimental findings. The aim of the study was to show the real accuracy and interpretation limits of the charge-density-derived data. An investigation of raw intensities showed that most of the reflections (60-70%) fulfil the normality test and the lowest ratio is observed for weak reflections. It appeared that unit-cell parameters are determined to the order of 10(-3) Š(for cell edges) and 10(-2) ° (for angles), and compare well with the older studies of the same compound and with the new 100 K neutron diffraction data set. Fit discrepancy factors are determined within a 0.5% range, while the residual density extrema are about ±0.16 (3) e Å(-3). The geometry is very well reproducible between different data sets. Regarding the multipole model, the largest errors are present on the valence shell charge-transfer parameters. In addition, symmetry restrictions of multipolar parameters, with respect to local coordinate systems, are well preserved. Standard deviations for electron density are lowest at bond critical points, being especially small for the hydrogen-bonded contacts. The same is true for kinetic and potential energy densities. This is also the case for the electrostatic potential distribution, which is statistically most significant in the hydrogen-bonded regions. Standard deviations for the integrated atomic charges are equal to about 0.1 e. Dipole moments for the water molecule are comparable with the ones presented in various earlier studies. The electrostatic energies should be treated rather qualitatively. However, they are quite well correlated with the PIXEL results.