Cement Augmented Pedicle Screw Instrumentation in Pediatric Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis in pediatric patients is rare. Osteomalacia and osteoporosis are known to develop in syndromic or neuromuscular scoliosis children. Spinal deformity surgery for pediatric patients with osteoporosis is challenging, associated with pedicle screw (PS) failure and compression fractures. Cement augmentation of PS is one several measures to prevent screw failure. It provides additional pull-out strength to the PS in the osteoporotic vertebra. METHODS: In 2010-2020, an analysis of pediatric patients who had cement augmentation of PS with a minimum follow-up of 2 years was performed. Radiological and clinical evaluations were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 7 patients (4 girls, 3 boys) with a mean age of 13 years (range, 10-14 years) and mean follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-3 years). Only 2 patients underwent revision surgery. Total number of cement augmented PSs was 52 with an average of 7 per patient. Only 1 patient had lower instrumented vertebra vertebroplasty. There was no PS pull-out in the cement augmented levels, and there were no neurological deficits or pulmonary cement embolisms. One patient developed a PS pull-out in uncemented levels. Two patients developed compression fractures, one, with osteogenesis imperfecta, in the supra-adjacent levels (upper instrumented vertebra + 1 and upper instrumented vertebra + 2), and the other, with neuromuscular scoliosis, in the uncemented segments. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, all cement augmented PSs provided satisfactory radiological outcomes without PS pull-out and adjacent vertebral compression fracture. In pediatric spine surgery, in osteoporotic patients with a poor bone purchase, cement augmentation may be used, especially in high-risk patients with osteogenesis imperfecta, neuromuscular scoliosis, and syndromic scoliosis.

The Importance of Lumbar Curve Flexibility and Apical Vertebral Rotation for the Prediction of Spontaneous Lumbar Curve Correction in Selective Thoracic Fusion for Lenke Type 1 and 2 C Curves: Retrospective Cohort Study with a Mean Follow-Up of More than 10 years.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Lumbar flexibility(LF) is generally defined with preoperative side bending films;it is not clear what percentage of LF predicts the spontaneous lumbar curve correction (SLCC) at long term follow up. Aim of this study was to find out cut-off value of preoperative LF,apical vertebra rotation(AVR) and apical vertebral translation(AVT);which may predict more than 50%SLCC. METHODS: Patients with Lenke 1C&2C curves,treated with posterior STF,with a minimum 10 years follow up were included.The patients who had more than 50% SLCC(Group A) or less than 50% (Group B) were compared in terms of LF,AVR and AVT to understand a cut-off value of those parameters.Statistically, Receiver Operating Characteristic(ROC) test was used. RESULTS: Fifty five AIS patients (54F, 1M) with mean age 14 (11-17) were included to study.Thoracic curve correction rate was 75%;lumbar curve correction rate was 59% at the latest follow up.Group A included 45(82%) patients at the latest follow up.Three patients (5%) showed coronal decompensation at early postop and 2 of them became compensated at f/up.ROC analyses showed 69% flexibility as the cut-off value for SLCC (P < .01).The difference between groups in terms of preop mean AVRs was significant (P = .029) (Group A = 1.9; Group B = 2.4). CONCLUSION: In Lenke 1C&2C curves,whenever LF on the preoperative bending x-ray is greater than 70% (P < .01)and AVR is equal or less than grade 2,STF provides satisfactory clinical and radiological SLCC with more than mean 10 years f/up.This flexibility rate and apical vertebral rotation can be helpful in decision making for successful STF.

Single-Stage Posterior Vertebral Column Resection With Circumferential Reconstruction for Thoracic/Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures With or Without Neurological Deficit: Clinical Neurological and Radiological Outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical, neurological, and radiological outcomes of posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) technique for treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar burst fractures. METHODS: Fifty-one patients (18 male, 33 female) with thoracic/thoracolumbar burst fractures who had been treated with PVCR technique were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative and most recent radiographs were evaluated and local kyphosis angle (LKA), sagittal and coronal spinal parameters were measured. Neurological and functional results were assessed by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale, visual analogue scale score, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form 36 version 2. RESULTS: The mean age was 49 years (range 22-83 years). The mean follow-up period was 69 months (range 28-216 months). Fractures were thoracic in 16 and thoracolumbar in 35 of the patients. AO spine thoracolumbar injury morphological types were as follows: 1 type A3, 15 type A4, 4 type B1, 23 type B2, 8 type C injuries. PVCR was performed in a single level in 48 of the patients and in 2 levels in 3 patients. The mean operative time was 434 minutes (range 270-530 minutes) and mean intraoperative blood loss was 520 mL (range 360-1100 mL). The mean LKA improved from 34.7° to 4.9° (85.9%). For 27 patients, the initial neurological deficit (ASIA A in 8, ASIA B in 3, ASIA C in 5, and ASIA D in 11) improved at least 1 ASIA grade (1-3 grades) in 22 patients (81.5%). Solid fusion, assessed with computed tomography at the final follow-up, was achieved in all patients. CONCLUSION: Single-stage PVCR provides complete spinal canal decompression, ideal kyphosis correction with gradual lengthening of anterior column together with sequential posterior column compression. Anterior column support, avoidance of the morbidity of anterior approach and improvement of neurological deficit are the other advantages of the single stage PVCR technique in patients with thoracic/thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Clinical, radiological and HRQoL outcomes after selective thoracic fusion with minimum 15-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study was to provide a 15-year natural history evaluation of the radiographic appearance of uninstrumented compensatory lumbar curves in patients who had undergone selective thoracic fusion (STF) for scoliosis, measure any changes in health-related quality of life scores (HRQoL) and compare them with controls matched for age, gender and body-mass index (BMI). METHODS: STF group included 43 female adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who underwent STF with mean age 33(27-42) years and a mean follow-up of 18.7 (15-28) years, mean BMI 22(18-29). Preop, early postop and follow-up radiographs were reviewed for behavior of lumbar curves. Control group included a random selection of healthy volunteers with no history of back pain and with mean age 33(27-41), and mean BMI 22(17-33). HRQoL scores were compared between two groups in latest f/up. Radiographs including low dose biplanar imaging with EOS were used to measure disc heights and assess for radiographic evidence of degenerative changes. Various parameters were statistically compared. RESULTS: Posterior fusion was performed in all 43, with all pedicle screws used in 41 and all-hook constructs in 2. Main thoracic curve correction was improved from pre-op to early-post-op and maintained at latest f/up (55.6°-16.1°-16.9°). Spontaneous lumbar curve correction (SLCC) was also maintained beyond 15 years (39.9°-16.6°-17.1°). Two patients developed coronal decompensation following surgery, but improved with time and were well compensated at final follow-up. Mean HRQoL scores, self-image and mental health scores were higher in STF group than control group (p < 0.05). SRS-22r pain and function, Oswestry Disability Index and Numeric Rating Scale, marital status, number of children were similar between the groups(p > 0.05). All disc heights except L5-S1 were significantly lower in STF group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups for degenerative changes in the latest radiographs. CONCLUSION: In this group of patients, the uninstrumented lumbar curve spontaneously corrected and the correction was maintained after 18 years following surgery using STF. Mild degenerative changes were seen radiographically and HRQoL scores suggest that the psychological-functional well-being are quite good in the long term in AIS patients who have undergone STF when compared with an age-gender-BMI-matched population.

Paper #21: Posterior Vertebral Column Resection (PVCR) for Congenital Thoracic Lordoscoliosis in children under age of 10 with minimum 5 years follow-up.

Congenital thoracic lordosis or lordoscoliosis are rare deformities which causes severe cardiopulmonary problems in early ages. PVCR is effective in restoring thoracal kyphosis in treatment of these rare deformities and avoids morbidity of combined surgeries.

Does It Make a Difference to Stop Fusion at L3 Versus L4 in Terms of Disc and Facet Joint Degeneration: An MRI Study With Minimum 5 Years Follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the functional outcomes of patients with idiopathic scoliosis who had surgical correction and fusion with all pedicle screw construct down to L3 or L4 and to evaluate whether saving a mobile lumbar motion segment distally would demonstrate any difference in terms of disc degeneration (DD) and facet joint degeneration (FJD) after minimum 5 years follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Selection of lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) is often difficult when lumbar curve was included into the fusion (L3 vs L4). Saving L4 is believed to be beneficial for preserving motion and preventing degeneration of unfused lumbar spine. METHODS: The L3 group included 21 patients (mean age of 21.4) and L4 group included 16 patients (mean age 22.9). Control group included 30 healthy individuals with no spinal deformities (mean age of 23.8). Follow-up lumbar magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were evaluated for each patient in terms of DD and FJD. Clinical evaluation was done by using the Scoliosis Research Society-22r, Oswestry Disability Index, and Numeric Rating Scale. RESULTS: Mean follow-up period was 7.4 (5-10) years in the L3 group and 9 (5-17) years in L4 group. Average correction rates for lumbar curve magnitudes were 78% in the L3 group and 79% in the L4 group, with no significant correction loss at the final follow-up. There was no statistical difference for DD in all groups (p > .05). FJD was significantly greater in both L3 and L4 groups compared to the control group (p < .001). Clinical outcome scores were similar among all three groups (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Spinal balance and corrections remained stable, without showing any decompensation over time. This midterm MRI study demonstrated similar disc and facet degeneration rates for L3 and L4 groups. FJD at the upper two levels adjacent to the LIV was significant for both surgically treated groups. Clinical outcome scores were similar for all groups at minimum 5 years follow-up.

Selective Thoracic Fusion Provides Similar Health-Related Quality of Life but Can Cause More Lumbar Disc and Facet Joint Degeneration: A Comparison of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients With Normal Population 10 Years After Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term behavior of the lumbar curve in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with selective thoracic fusion and to assess the clinical and radiologic outcomes in this fusion group compared with an age- and gender-matched group. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Selective thoracic fusion for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) preserves lumbar motion segments but leaves a residual deformity. By avoiding fusion of the lumbar spine, a greater mobility may be preserved, which may be an advantage in long-term follow-up in terms of degenerative changes in unfused segments. METHODS: Group A included 25 AIS patients with mean a age of 23.8 years and a mean 11.4 years of follow-up. Group B included 30 age- and gender-matched subjects without any deformity. Preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up radiographs were reviewed. All patients had MRIs taken at the final follow-up in order to evaluate disc degeneration (DD) and facet joint degeneration (FJD) at the unfused lumbar spine. Clinical evaluation was done by using Scoliosis Research Society-22R, Oswestry Disability Index, and numerical rating scale. RESULTS: Sagittal and coronal balance and lowest instrumented vertebra disc angulation were stable over time. Mean grading of lumbar DD was 2.16 (2-4) in Group A and 1.86 (1-3) in Group B. Lumbar FJDs were 2.05 (1-4) in Group A and 1.60 (1-3) in Group B. There was significant difference between the two groups for DD except for the L4-L5 level (p = .26). FJD was significantly higher in the L1-L2 and L2-L3 levels (L1-L2, p = .002, L2-L3, p = .002) but not for the other levels. Outcome scores were similar without significant differences between the two groups (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Selective thoracic fusion provides satisfactory outcomes at more than 10 years of follow-up. Our study demonstrated a moderate increase in the rate of disc degeneration in the unfused segments. Facet joint degeneration was significant at the upper two levels adjacent to the lowest instrumented vertebra.

The reliability of sagittal pelvic parameters: the effect of lumbosacral instrumentation and measurement experience.

STUDY DESIGN: Sagittal pelvic parameters (SPPs) of a representative patient sample drawn from a consecutive adult spinal deformity database were measured using Surgimap Spine. Estimated coefficient of reliability intraclass coefficient (95% confidence interval), standard error of measurement, and mean absolute deviation were used for the analysis. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to assess the reliability of SPP measurements using Surgimap Spine. The secondary objective was to evaluate the impact of pelvic instrumentation as well as the impact of user expertise. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The radiographical measurement of SPP is increasingly recognized as playing a critical role in establishing the surgical goals and surgical strategy of many spinal disorders. Although instrumented flatback is a common cause of sagittal malalignment, to our knowledge, SPP measurement reliability has never been assessed in instrumented spines. METHODS: Sixty-three adult full-spine standing lateral radiographs (31 with lumbosacral instrumentation) were measured twice by 13 observers using Surgimap Spine. Observers were stratified into 3 levels of experience: high (research coordinators, 4), mid (senior surgeons, 5), and low (junior surgeons, 4). Research coordinators trained all surgeons for less than 30 minutes. Parameters measured were pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope. RESULTS: Thirteen observers and 63 radiographs generated 817 observations (2 misses). Overall inter- and intraobserver reliability of SPP measurement was excellent (intraclass coefficient > 0.85). Lumbosacral instrumentation did not modify intraobserver reliability but reduced significantly interobserver reliability of pelvic tilt (P = 0.006) and sacral slope (P = 0.007). Experience did not affect intraobserver reliability but interobserver reliability of highly experienced observers was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than among less experienced observers. CONCLUSION: Measurement of SPP using Surgimap Spine equals or improves previously reported reliability data. Lumbosacral instrumentation reduces interobserver reliability taking it from excellent to moderate in the sacral slope measurement. Inexperienced observers can measure SPP reliably after a short tutorial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.