Prospective histological evaluation of a 20G core trap with a forward-cutting bevel needle for EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been established as a method to obtain tissues of various organs. To obtain sufficient tissue has clinical impact to facilitate the diagnosis by clinical pathologists, the assessment and subtyping of various neoplasms, and for further immunohistochemical investigations of tumor type. Recently, a novel 20G core trap with a forward-cutting beveled FNA needle (ProC-F) has become available. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA for pancreatic lesions using this needle. PATIENTS AND METHOD: In this study, the first puncture was performed using the ProC-F. Only tissue obtained with the first puncture using the ProC-F was used to evaluate diagnostic yield of ProC-F. The second puncture was performed using a 22G standard FNA needle using the same technique as for the first puncture. Second puncture was performed if the endosonographer did not feel that sufficient tissue had not been obtained by first puncture. RESULTS: Fifty-three consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA for pancreatic lesions were prospectively enrolled. The technical success rate of EUS-FNA using the ProC-F was 98.1% (52/53). The rate of adequate tissue obtained by ProC-F was 96.2% (50/52). On the other hand, the rate of adequate tissue obtained by the standard needle was 71.1%. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy of the ProC-F and the standard needle were 92.5, 100, 100, 76.9, and 94.0%, and 85.2, 100, 100, 55.6, and 87.5%, respectively. Diagnostic yield of ProC-F about sensitivity (P = 0.027), NPV (P = 0.035), and accuracy (P = 0.004) was significantly higher than of standard needle. Adverse events were not seen in any patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although only tissue obtained by the first puncture was evaluated, the rate of adequate tissue and the histologic diagnostic yield for pancreatic lesions were extremely high using the ProC-F.

Apoptosis, Dysbiosis and Expression of Inflammatory Cytokines are Sequential Events in the Development of 5-Fluorouracil-Induced Intestinal Mucositis in Mice.

The chemotherapeutic agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) causes intestinal mucositis with severe diarrhoea, but the pathogenesis is not fully understood. In this study, we investigated the pathogenic effects of 5-FU in mice, focusing on apoptosis, enterobacteria and inflammatory cytokines. Repeated administration of 5-FU caused severe intestinal mucositis on day 6, accompanied by diarrhoea and body-weight loss. TNF-α expression increased 1 day after exposure to the drug, and spiked a second time on day 4, at which point myeloperoxidase activity and IL-1ß expression also increased. Apoptotic cells were observed in intestinal crypts only on day 1. 5-FU also induced dysbiosis, notably decreasing the abundance of intestinal Firmicutes while increasing the abundance of Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobia. Twice-daily co-administration of oral antibiotics significantly reduced the severity of intestinal mucositis and dysbiosis, and blocked the increase in myeloperoxidase activity and cytokine expression on day 6, without affecting apoptosis and TNF-α up-regulation on day 1. In cultured colonic epithelial cells, exposure to 5-FU also up-regulated TNF-α expression. Collectively, the data suggest that crypt apoptosis, dysbiosis and expression of inflammatory cytokines are sequential events in the development of intestinal mucositis after exposure to 5-FU. In particular, 5-FU appears to directly induce apoptosis via TNF-α and to suppress intestinal cell proliferation, thereby resulting in degradation of the epithelial barrier, as well as in secondary inflammation mediated by inflammatory cytokines.

Evaluation of the safety of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for malignant biliary stricture using a digital peroral cholangioscope (with videos).

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The clinical impact of catheter-based radiofrequency ablation (RFA) under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guidance has recently been reported; however, severe adverse events have also been noted. If tumor is not present in the biliary tract, severe adverse events such as perforation or bleeding as a result of vessel injury around the biliary tract may occur. In addition, the effectiveness of RFA may not be sufficient based solely on radiographic guidance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the actual feasibility of intraductal RFA by peroral cholangioscope (POCS) evaluation before/after RFA. METHODS: In this retrospective study carried out between July and September 2016, consecutive patients who underwent RFA for malignant biliary stricture and POCS evaluation before/after RFA were enrolled. Primary endpoint of this study was technical feasibility of RFA, which was evaluated by POCS. Secondary endpoints were rates and types of adverse event. RESULTS: A total of 12 consecutive patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Stent placement using uncovered metal stents had been previously done in six patients before RFA. Tumor was seen in the biliary tract in all patients. RFA was technically successful in all patients, and clinical success was confirmed in all patients by POCS imaging. Adverse events were seen in only one patient. Median stent patency was 154 days. CONCLUSIONS: RFA for malignant biliary stricture may be safe. To confirm the feasibility and efficacy of RFA, additional cases, prospective studies, and a comparison study between with and without endobiliary RFA are needed.

Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage as a rescue of re-intervention procedure for high-grade hilar stricture.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Re-intervention after stent placement for malignant hepatic hilum obstruction (HBO) is challenging. endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been developed as an alternative method for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In this retrospective study, the clinical utility of EUS-BD as a rescue drainage technique for HBO patients who failed re-intervention under ERCP guidance was evaluated. METHODS: Between April 2012 and August 2015, patients with HBO were enrolled. Patients' characteristics, kinds of metallic stents, configuration of stent placement, overall survival, stent patency, and results of re-intervention were reviewed, along with the re-intervention technical success rate. RESULTS: The biliary stricture type was Bismuth type IV in 59% (23/39) and types IIIa and b in 20.5% (8/39) each. Biliary metallic stent placement was bilateral in 38.5% (15/39), and unilateral in 61.5% (24/39). Primary stent dysfunction was observed in 71.8% (28/39) of cases. Planned re-intervention under ERCP guidance was attempted in 26 patients. The technical success rate was 62% (16/26). For the 10 patients who failed re-intervention under ERCP guidance, EUS-BD was planned. The technical success rate was 100% (10/10). The procedure time was 25.8 min. Adverse events were not seen in any patients. Stent patency after re-intervention was not significantly different between ERCP (165 days) guidance and EUS-BD (152 days) guidance (P = 0.463) CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, EUS-BD as a re-intervention method for metallic stent obstruction was safe and feasible. If ERCP was failed, EUS-BD may be one of option as re-intervention method for high-grade hilar stricture.

Choledochoduodenal Fistula after the Placement of a Partially Covered Metal Stent for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

A 75-year-old Japanese man with type 2 diabetes mellitus suffered from unresectable pancreatic head cancer and was admitted to our institution due to acute cholangitis. A partially covered metal stent was placed at that time. 11 months later, he was readmitted for acute cholangitis. Upper endoscopy revealed complete stent distal migration and a small hole on the oral side of the ampulla. While attempting cannulation into the hole, an upstream biliary tract was revealed. Accordingly, we diagnosed the patient to have a choledochoduodenal fistula. After metal stent removal and balloon dilation, we placed two 7 Fr plastic stents, which successfully relieved the patient's cholangitis.

EUS-guided FNA for biliary disease as first-line modality to obtain histological evidence.

BACKGROUND: Few reports have described endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for biliary lesions. In addition, adverse events were not completely examined in previous reports, due to the inclusion of cases in which biliary stents had already been placed. The present study aimed to investigate the diagnostic yield and adverse events of EUS-FNA for biliary lesions as the first-line diagnostic modality for consecutive prospectively registered patients. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with suspected cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) based on computed tomography or other imaging modalities; (2) patients who had not previously undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or EUS-FNA; (3) absence of surgically altered anatomy, such as Roux-en-Y anastomosis or duodenal obstruction caused by tumor invasion, through which an endoscope could not pass; and (4) provision of written informed consent to all procedures associated with the study. RESULTS: A total of 47 consecutive patients with suspected CCA were registered to this study. Sensitivity and accuracy were 89% and 87%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, puncture site was the only factor associated with reduced diagnostic yield (hazard ration, 6.879; 95% confidence interval, 1.172-40.374; P = 0.033). Remarkably, no adverse events such as bleeding or bile leakage were associated with EUS-FNA in any of the 47 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that EUS-FNA can be safely performed for biliary disease without biliary stenting. Furthermore, this procedure may warrant use as the first-line diagnostic method, although our results need to be validated in future prospective studies.

EUS-guided cholecystoduodenostomy for acute cholecystitis with an anti-stent migration and anti-food impaction system; a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gall bladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has been reported using a self-expandable metallic stent. To prevent stent migration and food flowing into the common bile duct through the cystic duct, we perform a novel EUS-guided cholecystoduodenostomy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of EUS-guided cholecystoduodenostomy with an anti-stent migration and anti-food impaction system. METHODS: A total of 16 consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided cholecystoduodenostomy for acute cholecystitis were included in this study. RESULTS: Technical and clinical success was obtained in all patients. The median procedure time was 26.9 min (range 19-42 min). Median follow-up time was 181.5 days (range 18-604 days), and in this time, recurrence of acute cholecystitis was not seen in all patients. Adverse events such as stent migration and cholangitis were not seen in any patients, although pneumoperitoneum was seen in one patient. CONCLUSION: Our technique may be favorable and effective for the prevention of adverse events on EUS-GBD.

Comparison of the clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and hepaticogastrostomy for bile duct obstruction with duodenal obstruction.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: To date, only a few reports with small numbers of patients have described double stenting (biliary and duodenal), in particular endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage, for patients with obstructive jaundice. In addition, no reports have sought to determine which EUS-guided biliary drainage route has better outcomes. The aim of the current study was to investigate adverse events and stent patency in patients who underwent EUS-guided biliary drainage and duodenal stenting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who were admitted to the Osaka Medical College with obstructive jaundice caused by lower biliary obstruction and duodenal obstruction due to malignant tumor between June 2012 and April 2014 were retrospectively enrolled in the study. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were enrolled in the study; 13 underwent EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS), and 26 underwent EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS). Adjusted analyses for covariates using propensity scores showed that the EUS-HGS group had significantly longer stent patency than the EUS-CDS group (duodenal stent patency: median 113 vs. 34 days; hazard ratio [HR] 0.415, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.175 - 0.984; P = 0.046; biliary stent patency: median 133 vs. 37 days; HR 0.391, 95 %CI 0.156 - 0.981; P = 0.045). On logistic regression analysis, only EUS-CDS was associated with adverse events, in particular reflux cholangitis (OR 10.285, 95 %CI 1.686 - 62.733; P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: In cases of obstructive jaundice with duodenal obstruction, EUS-HGS may be better than EUS-CDS, with longer stent patency and fewer adverse events.

Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Abscess Drainage Using Self-Expandable Covered Metallic Stent (with Video).

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous drainage (PCD) is now the first-line drainage method for liver abscess because of its minimal invasiveness and high technical success rate. However, this procedure has several disadvantages, such as extra-drainage and self-tube removal. Recently, EUS-guided liver abscess drainage (EUS-AD) has been developed. However, only a few reports of EUS-AD have been reported. In addition, the clinical benefits of PCD and EUS-AD have not been reported. AIMS: In the present study, the safety and feasibility of EUS-AD using fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) and the clinical outcomes of EUS-AD and PCD were examined retrospectively. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients who underwent PCD or EUS-AD between April 2012 and April 2015 were included in this study. EUS-AD was performed using FCSEMS. In addition, to prevent stent migration, 7-Fr pig tail plastic stent was placed within FCSEMS. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all patients of both groups. Clinical success was 100 % in the EUS-AD group although it was 89 % in PCD group (P = 034). Three adverse events were seen in the PCD group (self-tube removal n = 1, tube migration n = 2), but no adverse events were seen in the EUS-AD group. The median hospital stay was significantly shorter in the EUS-AD group than in the PCD group (21 vs 41 days, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Because of the short hospital stay, the high clinical success rate, and the low adverse event rate compared to PCD, EUS-AD has potential as a first-line treatment for liver abscess.

A Duodenal Ulcer Caused by Pancreatic Ductal Hypertension with Chronic Pancreatitis.

We herein describe the case of a 67-year-old woman with a duodenal ulcer thought to be caused by elevated pancreatic ductal pressure. The patient complained of continuous upper abdominal pain. Her medical history included idiopathic chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy revealed a huge duodenal ulcer located on the inferior duodenal angle, which had not been seen on endoscopic retrograde pancreatography two months previously. A combination study using endoscopy and contrast imaging confirmed the relationship between the duodenal ulcer and the pancreatic branch duct. To our knowledge, this is the first case of duodenal ulcer thought to be caused by elevated pancreatic ductal pressure.

Stent length is impact factor associated with stent patency in endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Despite high technical and functional success rates with endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), rates of adverse events have also been high. No reports have focused on EUS-HGS alone with a large sample size about predictors of stent patency. The present study examined predictors of stent patency in patients who underwent EUS-HGS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The consecutive 51 patients who underwent EUS-HGS using one metallic stent were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Baseline characteristics, stent length from the hepatic portion and in the luminal portion, kinds of stent dysfunction, and stent patency were reviewed. RESULTS: Median duration of stent patency was significantly shorter with stent length in the luminal portion <3 cm (52 days) than with ≥3 cm (195 days; P < 0.01). On the other hand, median duration of stent patency did not differ significantly between ≥4 cm (194 days) and <4 cm (127 days; P = 0.1726). Length of stent in the luminal portion ≥3 cm (Hazard ration [HR], 9.242; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.255-26.244, P < 0.05) and performance of chemotherapy (HR, 3.022; 95% CI, 1.448-6.304, P < 0.05) were also associated with long stent patency on the Cox proportional hazards model. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, to obtain long-term stent patency, our data suggest that a stent length ≥3 cm in the luminal portion may be suitable for EUS-HGS.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for right hepatic bile duct obstruction: novel technical tips.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is not normally indicated for an obstructed right intrahepatic bile duct (IHBD). The technical feasibility and clinical efficacy of a novel technique of EUS-BD for right IHBD obstruction were evaluated. A total of 11 patients underwent drainage using either a left or a right biliary access route. The causes of obstructive jaundice were cholangiocarcinoma (n = 6), pancreatic cancer (n = 3), gastric cancer (n = 1), and colon cancer (n = 1). After placement of an uncovered metal stent to bridge the obstruction, a hepaticogastrostomy was completed using a covered stent. Mean procedure time was 33.9 ±â€Š10.0 minutes. Technical and functional success were achieved in all patients, and no adverse events occurred. This novel method appears to be safe and effective for right IHBD obstruction.