Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Afr J Reprod Health ; 24(1): 115-120, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32358943

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic surgery of ectopic pregnancy is actually the gold standard for the management of fallopian tubal diseases. A survey was conducted to evaluate fertility in patients who underwent endoscopic management for ectopic pregnancy. A retrospective study was conducted at the department of general and endoscopic surgery of the Point "G" teaching hospital, in Bamako, Mali, from January 1st 2007 to December 31, 2016. Forty-eight (48) patients who underwent endoscopic management of tubal ectopic pregnancy and who have been followed up for fertility were included in this study. Statistical tests used were X2 or Fisher test and their confident interval, p <1 % has been considered as statistically significant. The therapeutic score of Pouly was less than 4 in 25.0% (n = 12). The return to fertility was observed among 48.0% of patients (n = 23). The chance of conception was less than 80.0% after the fourth postoperative year (p=0.001). The outcome of pregnancies has been seventeen full-term pregnancies, three ectopic pregnancies and three miscarriages. The occurrence of pregnancy after endoscopic management indicated for ectopic pregnancy is possible. However, many factors can influence the future conception.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy/adverse effects , Fertility/physiology , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Pregnancy, Ectopic/surgery , Pregnancy, Tubal/surgery , Adult , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Infertility, Female/epidemiology , Mali/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy, Ectopic/epidemiology , Pregnancy, Tubal/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Salpingostomy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
2.
Pan Afr Med J ; 23: 24, 2016.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27200129

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work was to present the contribution of the endoscopy in the management of esophageal dilatation for caustic esophageal stenosis (CES). METHODS: This was a descriptive and prospective study in the thoracic surgery department at the Hospital of Mali. A total of 46 cases of CES is recorded and divided into 4 groups according to the topography of the esophageal lesions. For the different methods of dilatation the number of performed endoscopic support was determined to understand the contribution of endoscopic means in the success of dilatation for CES. The outcome, complications and mortality in the two methods were compared. RESULTS: Fibroscopy was used in 41.30% of patients with Savary Guillard dilators and in 47.82% of patients with Lerut dilators. Video laryngoscopy was used in 58.69% of patients who underwent dilatation with Lerut dilators. The passage of the guide wire was performed in 39.13% under video laryngoscopy and 58.68% under fibroscopy. In comparison of the two methods, there is a significant difference in the occurrence of complications (p=0.04075), general anesthesia (p=0.02287), accessibility (p=0.04805) and mortality (p=0.00402). CONCLUSION: The CES is a serious disease and under evaluated in Mali. The endoscopies contribute significantly to the success of esophageal dilatation for caustic stenosis in the different methods we used.


Subject(s)
Burns, Chemical/therapy , Esophageal Stenosis/therapy , Esophagoscopy/methods , Adolescent , Burns, Chemical/pathology , Caustics/toxicity , Child , Dilatation/methods , Esophageal Stenosis/pathology , Female , Humans , Laryngoscopy/methods , Male , Mali , Prospective Studies , Video-Assisted Surgery/methods , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...