ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We performed an observational study that compared baseline and subsequent blood pressure (BP) measurements and its association with haematoma enlargement (HE) in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: We prospectively studied consecutive patients with supratentorial spontaneous ICH within the first 6 h after the onset of symptoms. HE was defined as an increase >or=33% in the volume of haematoma on the CT obtained 24-48 h after the onset of symptoms as compared with the CT at admission. We recorded systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP) and mean BP (MBP) at admission and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 h after onset; the maximum SBP, DBP and MBP during the study period; the maximum SBP and DBP within intervals; the mean of all BP readings; administration of antihypertensive agents. RESULTS: We studied 60 patients whose mean age was 72.1 +/- 11.3 years. HE was observed in 27 (45%) patients. No statistically significant differences were observed in any of the analyses that compared BP parameters between the HE and non-HE groups (two-way anova). CONCLUSIONS: In an exploratory analysis, we did not find an association between BP and HE within the first 24 h after an acute ICH.
Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/physiology , Cerebral Hemorrhage/physiopathology , Cerebrovascular Circulation/physiology , Hematoma/physiopathology , Acute Disease , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Cerebral Hemorrhage/complications , Cerebral Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Disease Progression , Female , Hematoma/diagnostic imaging , Hematoma/etiology , Homeostasis , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
Patients complaining of chest pain (CP) who visit the emergency department (ED) represent the second cause of consultation in this department, and 20-30% of hospital admissions for medical reasons. These patients form a somewhat heterogeneous group with many different aetiologies and degrees of severity. In this setting, the clinical objectives include the prompt identification of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), the prompt evaluation of the immediate risk (i.e., initial risk stratification) of cardiovascular complications in order to tailor the treatment for each individual patient and to make the best use of hospital resources, and the prompt identification of patients with other potentially severe diseases. The diagnosis of ACS in patients coming to the ED for CP or any equivalent angina is one of the most difficult diagnostic challenges facing physicians in the ED. The correct diagnosis and risk stratification of these patients has clinical consequences, as well as very important legal and economic implications. The only methodology with a clear clinical impact on diagnosis, risk stratification and initial management is clinical evaluation based on data obtained by questioning the patient, carrying out a physical examination, and interpreting the results of a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Nevertheless, its combined diagnostic efficiency for ACS is imperfect and additional strategies are emerging which include serial ECG, the detection of serum biochemical markers of myocardial necrosis, exercise testing, and radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.
Subject(s)
Chest Pain/diagnosis , Coronary Disease/diagnostic imaging , Decision Support Techniques , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Heart/diagnostic imaging , Risk Assessment/methods , Tomography, Emission-Computed/methods , Acute Disease , Algorithms , Chest Pain/complications , Coronary Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Disease/etiology , Humans , Patient Selection , Syndrome , Triage/methodsSubject(s)
Chest Pain/etiology , Diagnostic Errors , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Pancreatitis/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Electrocardiography , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Necrosis , Pancreatitis/blood , Pancreatitis/complications , Pancreatitis/therapy , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chest pain is a frequent symptom in the emergency department and often presents a diagnostic challenge. Because coronary thrombosis is a hallmark of acute ischemic syndromes, the substrates of the coagulation and fibrinolysis cascades may be markers of coronary ischemia. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of several hemostatic markers in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain syndromes. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-seven consecutive patients with acute chest pain were studied in this prospective study conducted in an urban ED. D-Dimer levels were measured at admission to the ED in all patients. We also measured thrombin-antithrombin complexes, prothrombin fragment 1+2, activated factor VII, and fibrinogen. We used regression analysis to estimate the likelihood of myocardial infarction and the diagnostic value of D-dimer. RESULTS: D-Dimer and fibrinogen levels were significantly higher in patients with acute ischemic events (myocardial infarction and unstable angina) than in nonischemic patients (P <.01 and P =.02, respectively). The other hemostatic markers were not significantly elevated in patients with ischemic events. D-Dimer level >500 microg/L had an independent diagnostic value for myocardial infarction and increased the diagnostic sensitivity of the electrocardiogram and history from 73% to 92%. CONCLUSION: D-Dimer, an expression of ongoing thrombus formation and lysis, is a marker of substantial incremental value for the early diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes presenting with chest pain. It adds independent information to the traditional assessment for myocardial infarction. D-Dimer can be incorporated into clinical decision models in the ED.
